| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000063227 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000072355 |
| Scientific Title | Computed tomography angiography-first versus immediate operation for penetrating neck injury patients with hard signs: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/10/09 |
| Last modified on | 2026/10/09 09:32:58 |
Computed tomography angiography for penetrating neck injury with hard signs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PNI-CTA SR/MA
Computed tomography angiography-first versus immediate operation for penetrating neck injury patients with hard signs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PNI-HS-CTA SR/MA
| Japan |
Penetrating neck injury with hard signs
| Emergency medicine |
Others
NO
To systematically evaluate whether a computed tomography angiography (CTA)-first strategy, compared with immediate operative exploration, is associated with improved clinical outcomes in adult patients with penetrating neck injury presenting with hard signs who are hemodynamically stable and, when necessary, have a secured airway.
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Explanatory
Not applicable
Rate of neck operation comparing a CTA-first strategy with immediate operative exploration. Dichotomous outcomes will be synthesized using pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
1.Incidence of missed injury
2.Incidence of complications
3.Mortality
4.Blood transfusion volume
5.Intensive care unit length of stay
6.Hospital length of stay
Others,meta-analysis etc
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
Studies meeting the following criteria will be included: adult patients with penetrating neck injury presenting with hard signs; patients who are hemodynamically stable or stabilized after initial resuscitation; studies evaluating a CTA-first strategy and/or immediate operative exploration; and studies reporting extractable data for at least one prespecified outcome.
Studies will be excluded if they include only pediatric patients; do not primarily evaluate penetrating neck injury; do not allow extraction of data for patients with hard signs; do not provide evaluable outcomes for CTA-first or immediate operative management; are case reports, reviews, or other non-primary studies; or lack extractable outcome data.
| 1st name | Tomohiro |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Akutsu |
Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital
Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
3000028
4-1-1 Otsuno Tsuchiura Ibaraki Japan
0298303711
doitin41@gmail.com
| 1st name | Tomohiro |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Akutsu |
Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital
Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
3000028
4-1-1 Otsuno Tsuchiura Ibaraki Japan
09053225262
doitin41@gmail.com
Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital
Tomohiro Akutsu
The Japanese Association for The Surgery of Trauma, the General Insurance Association of Japan and Zenkyoren(National Mutual Insurance Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives).
Other
Japan
No
No
No
No
NO
| 2026 | Year | 10 | Month | 09 | Day |
Unpublished
635
CTA first significantly reduced neck operations versus immediate surgery (RR 0.07,95% CI 0.01-0.50), with no clear increase in complications (RR 0.88,95% CI 0.36-2.16), missed injuries, or mortality.
| 2026 | Year | 10 | Month | 09 | Day |
Completed
| 2024 | Year | 12 | Month | 12 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 05 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 20 | Day |
This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing a CTA-first strategy with immediate operative exploration in adult patients with penetrating neck injury presenting with hard signs. Relevant studies will be systematically identified using electronic databases. Study selection and data extraction will be performed independently by multiple reviewers according to prespecified eligibility criteria. The primary outcome is the rate of neck operation. Secondary outcomes include missed injury, complications, mortality, blood transfusion volume, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay. For dichotomous outcomes, risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated and pooled when appropriate. Risk of bias will be assessed for included studies, and certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE approach.
| 2026 | Year | 10 | Month | 09 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 10 | Month | 09 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000072355