| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000063111 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000072247 |
| Scientific Title | Exploratory study of stimulation-site selection and individualized intervention using sensory-threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/09/30 |
| Last modified on | 2026/09/30 09:39:55 |
Exploratory study of stimulation-site selection and individualized intervention using sensory-threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis
Sensory-threshold NMES study in stroke
Exploratory study of stimulation-site selection and individualized intervention using sensory-threshold neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis
Sensory-threshold NMES study in stroke
| Japan |
Stroke with hemiparesis
| Rehabilitation medicine |
Others
NO
To compare the immediate effects of sensory-level neuromuscular electrical stimulation (S-NMES) applied to the tibialis anterior and triceps surae on postural control and gait in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis, and to explore changes in balance and gait following a 2-week individualized intervention in which the stimulation site is selected based on the immediate response.
Efficacy
Exploratory
Explanatory
Not applicable
Improvement rate in mediolateral (ML) center of pressure (CoP) path length during quiet standing with eyes closed at the immediate assessment. On both the tibialis anterior (TA) and triceps surae (TS) stimulation days, two trials are performed before S-NMES (no-stimulation condition) and during S-NMES. The improvement rate is calculated as the difference between the mean no-stimulation value and the mean during-stimulation value, divided by the mean no-stimulation value, and multiplied by 100 percent.
Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest): Change from baseline to the end of the 2-week intervention will be assessed. For participants available for follow-up, the Mini-BESTest will also be assessed 2 weeks after completion of the intervention.
Center of pressure (CoP) measures: CoP velocity and mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) CoP path lengths will be assessed during the immediate assessment (before and during S-NMES), at baseline, at the end of the 2-week intervention, and, when feasible, 2 weeks after completion of the intervention.
Gait measures: gait speed, gait cycle time variability, stance time variability, and stride length will be assessed during the immediate assessment (before and during S-NMES), at baseline, at the end of the 2-week intervention, and, when feasible, 2 weeks after completion of the intervention.
Other clinical measures: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment of lower-extremity motor and sensory function, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), plantar tactile sensation, vibration sensation, Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV), and modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) will be assessed at baseline, at the end of the 2-week intervention, and, when feasible, 2 weeks after completion of the intervention.
Exploratory outcomes include CoP root mean square (RMS), mean power frequency (MPF), median power frequency (MdPF), and intermuscular coherence between the paretic tibialis anterior and soleus muscles.
Interventional
Cross-over
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
No need to know
2
Treatment
| Device,equipment |
During the immediate assessment, sensory-level neuromuscular electrical stimulation (S-NMES) is applied to the paretic tibialis anterior (TA) on Day 1 and to the paretic triceps surae (TS) on Day 2. On each stimulation day, measurements are performed before S-NMES under the no-stimulation condition and then during S-NMES. Stimulation parameters are 100 Hz, a pulse width of 200 microseconds, an intensity approximately 1.5 times the sensory threshold without visible muscle contraction, and a stimulation duration of 40 minutes. After completion of the immediate assessments for both TA and TS stimulation, the stimulation site for the 2-week intervention is individually selected based on the improvement rate in mediolateral CoP path length during standing with eyes closed. S-NMES is then applied to the selected site once daily for 40 minutes on intervention days for 2 weeks.
During the immediate assessment, sensory-level neuromuscular electrical stimulation (S-NMES) is applied to the paretic triceps surae (TS) on Day 1 and to the paretic tibialis anterior (TA) on Day 2. On each stimulation day, measurements are performed before S-NMES under the no-stimulation condition and then during S-NMES. Stimulation parameters are 100 Hz, a pulse width of 200 microseconds, an intensity approximately 1.5 times the sensory threshold without visible muscle contraction, and a stimulation duration of 40 minutes. After completion of the immediate assessments for both TA and TS stimulation, the stimulation site for the 2-week intervention is individually selected based on the improvement rate in mediolateral CoP path length during standing with eyes closed. S-NMES is then applied to the selected site once daily for 40 minutes on intervention days for 2 weeks.
| 20 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
1.Patients aged 20 years or older with first-ever unilateral stroke and hemiparesis whose general condition is stable.
2.Patients who are able to maintain quiet standing with the feet together for 60 seconds without physical assistance.
3.Patients who are able to walk 10 m with supervision.
4.Patients in whom the sensory threshold can be determined and sensory-level electrical stimulation according to the study protocol can be safely applied.
5.Patients who receive written and verbal explanations of the study and provide written informed consent.
1.Patients with neurological diseases other than stroke.
2.Patients with severe orthopedic disorders that clearly affect balance.
3.Patients with severe peripheral neuropathy.
4.Patients with visual impairment such as hemianopia that interferes with study procedures, severe hearing impairment, dizziness, or evident vestibular disorders.
5.Patients who are unable to safely and consistently complete the study procedures because of cognitive or communication impairment.
6.Patients with conditions for which electrical stimulation is considered unsafe, such as the use of implanted electrical devices.
7.Patients considered unsuitable for participation by the principal investigator for safety reasons or because of concerns regarding interpretation of the data.
5
| 1st name | Akinori |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Tsuchiya |
Ukai Rehabilitation Hospital
Department of Rehabilitation
4530811
4-1 Taikodori, Nakamura-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
052-461-3132
labradoor.yellow@gmail.com
| 1st name | Akinori |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Tsuchiya |
Ukai Rehabilitation Hospital
Department of Rehabilitation
4530811
4-1 Taikodori, Nakamura-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
052-461-3132
labradoor.yellow@gmail.com
Ukai Rehabilitation Hospital
Kio University
Other
Research Ethics Committee, Kio University
4-2-2 Umaminaka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragi-gun, Nara 635-0832, Japan
0745-54-1601
kansa@kio.ac.jp
NO
| 2026 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2026 | Year | 09 | Month | 27 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 10 | Month | 15 | Day |
| 2028 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000072247