| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000062628 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000071689 |
| Scientific Title | A multicenter prospective study of the efficacy of figure-of-eight and modified figure-of-eight sutures for femoral venous hemostasis after catheter ablation |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/08/20 |
| Last modified on | 2026/08/20 00:19:46 |
A study comparing two figure-of-eight suture techniques for femoral venous hemostasis after atrial fibrillation ablation
FoE/mFoE Study
A multicenter prospective study of the efficacy of figure-of-eight and modified figure-of-eight sutures for femoral venous hemostasis after catheter ablation
FoE/mFoE Study
| Japan |
Symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation
| Cardiology |
Others
NO
To compare conventional figure-of-eight suturing (FoE) with modified figure-of-eight suturing (mFoE) for femoral venous hemostasis after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. The primary outcome is the non-inferiority of time to hemostasis (TTH; the time from sheath removal to confirmed hemostasis). As a secondary outcome, a safety-prioritized hierarchical composite comprising (1) serious vascular access-site complications, (2) bleeding complications requiring additional manual compression, (3) access-site hematoma, and (4) TTH will be evaluated descriptively using the win ratio; no confirmatory superiority or non-inferiority claim will be made for this composite. Individual component results will also be reported as supportive analyses. Participants will be allocated 1:1 by alternation according to the order of participant registration (quasi-randomization).
Safety,Efficacy
Confirmatory
Pragmatic
Not applicable
The primary outcome is the non-inferiority of time to hemostasis (TTH) for the mFoE group compared with the FoE group. TTH is defined as the time in minutes from sheath removal to confirmed hemostasis, assessed on the day of the procedure after sheath removal.
The secondary outcome is a safety-prioritized hierarchical composite consisting of: (1) serious vascular access-site complications; (2) bleeding complications requiring additional manual compression; (3) access-site hematoma; and (4) TTH. The mFoE and FoE groups will be compared using the win ratio (including win difference and win odds), reported descriptively; no confirmatory superiority or non-inferiority claim will be made. Components 1--3 will be assessed from sheath removal through hospital discharge, with access-site findings evaluated by ultrasonography. Incidence of each component will also be reported individually as supportive analyses. Other secondary outcomes will include rebleeding, hemoglobin decrease, other bleeding or vascular complications, and patient or procedural factors associated with TTH. Assessments will be performed from the day of the procedure through hospital discharge, including next-day access-site ultrasonography.
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Pseudo-randomization
2
Treatment
| Maneuver |
Conventional figure-of-eight suture (FoE) group: after completion of ablation, a conventional FoE suture is placed once, with the needle passed perpendicular to the femoral venous sheath. Time to hemostasis is measured after sheath removal. Bed rest is discontinued after 4 hours once hemostasis is confirmed. The access site is followed through hospital discharge, including ultrasonographic assessment on the day after the procedure.
Modified figure-of-eight suture (mFoE) group: after completion of ablation, an mFoE suture is placed once. The needle is passed parallel to the femoral venous sheath to avoid sheath contact and captures only subcutaneous tissue. Subsequent measurement of time to hemostasis, 4-hour bed rest, follow-up through hospital discharge, and next-day ultrasonographic assessment are identical to those in the FoE group.
| 20 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
(1) Age 20 years or older; (2) symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation; (3) scheduled to undergo atrial fibrillation catheter ablation including pulmonary vein isolation; and (4) provision of written informed consent.
Patients who do not provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
400
| 1st name | Yasushi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Oginosawa |
University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
The Department of Heart Rhythm Management
807-8555
1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 807-8555, Japan
093-603-1611
y-ogi@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp
| 1st name | Takahiro |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Kobayashi |
University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
Department of Cardiology and Nephrology
807-8555
1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 807-8555, Japan
093-603-1611
koba655696@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp
Kumamoto Rosai Hospital
None
Self funding
Japan
Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan; Kitakyushu City Yahata Hospital; Kyushu Rosai Hospital Moji Medical Center
None
Ethics Review Committee of Kumamoto Rosai Hospital
1670 Takehara-machi, Yatsushiro, Kumamoto 866-8533, Japan
0965-33-4151
kazz_kawakami@me.com
YES
22-15
Ethics Review Committee of Kumamoto Rosai Hospital
該当なし
熊本労災病院(熊本県)、産業医科大学病院(福岡県)、北九州市立八幡病院(福岡県)、門司メディカルセンター(福岡県)
| 2026 | Year | 08 | Month | 20 | Day |
Unpublished
Enrolling by invitation
| 2023 | Year | 01 | Month | 07 | Day |
| 2023 | Year | 02 | Month | 03 | Day |
| 2023 | Year | 02 | Month | 07 | Day |
| 2027 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 08 | Month | 20 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 08 | Month | 20 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000071689