| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000062329 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000071327 |
| Scientific Title | An Empirical Study of Nudge-Based Interventions to Enhance Trust in Generic Drugs and Promote Their Use |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/07/24 |
| Last modified on | 2026/07/24 14:48:34 |
An Empirical Study of Nudge-Based Interventions to Enhance Trust in Generic Drugs and Promote Their Use
Nudges to Promote Generic Drug Use
An Empirical Study of Nudge-Based Interventions to Enhance Trust in Generic Drugs and Promote Their Use
Nudges to Promote Generic Drug Use
| Japan |
No specific condition
| Not applicable | Adult |
Others
NO
This study aimed to assess whether loss- and gain-framed nudges highlighting the price difference under Japan's cost-sharing policy for long-listed drugs increased intention to use generic drugs immediately after the intervention and self-reported generic drug uptake two months later, compared with a neutral control message. The study focused on adults who reported not using generic drugs or being unsure whether they used them and who had low trust in their safety and effectiveness. We also examined whether these effects differed by sex.
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Explanatory
Not applicable
Intention to use generic drugs immediately after exposure to the assigned message at Wave 1 (15-19 May 2025). Agreement with the statement "I would like to use generic drugs" was assessed on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"). Responses were dichotomised as intention to use (scores 4-5) or no intention to use (scores 1-3).
Self-reported generic drug uptake approximately two months after exposure to the assigned message at Wave 2 (15-19 July 2025). Participants who reported visiting a healthcare provider during the follow-up period were asked whether they were currently using generic drugs.
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Single blind -participants are blinded
Active
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Central registration
3
Educational,Counseling,Training
| Behavior,custom |
At Wave 1 (15-19 May 2025), after receiving the common standardized policy explanation, participants viewed the following loss-framed nudge message once online: "If you choose a brand-name drug instead of a generic drug, you will be required to pay a special fee equal to one-quarter of the price difference between the two drugs. As a result, your out-of-pocket medication costs may increase by approximately 30-50%." No additional intervention was provided at Wave 2.
At Wave 1 (15-19 May 2025), after receiving the common standardized policy explanation, participants viewed the following gain-framed nudge message once online: "If you choose a generic drug instead of a brand-name drug, the special fee equal to one-quarter of the price difference between the two drugs will be waived. As a result, your out-of-pocket medication costs may decrease by approximately 20-30%." No additional intervention was provided at Wave 2.
At Wave 1 (15-19 May 2025), after receiving the common standardized policy explanation, participants viewed the following neutral control message once online: "If you choose a brand-name drug instead of a generic drug, you will be required to pay a special fee equal to one-quarter of the price difference between the two drugs." No additional intervention was provided at Wave 2.
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
Participants were eligible if they met all of the following criteria: (1) were aged 18 years or older; (2) were able to choose a generic drug; (3) reported that they were not currently using generic drugs or were unsure whether they were using them; (4) had low trust in generic drugs, defined as a score of 3 or lower for both the statements "Generic drugs are safe" and "Generic drugs are effective" on five-point Likert scales ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"); and (5) provided electronic informed consent.
Participants were excluded if they met any of the following criteria: (1) were younger than 18 years; (2) were unable to choose a generic drug; (3) reported that they were currently using generic drugs; (4) scored 4 or higher on either the perceived safety or perceived effectiveness item and therefore did not meet the definition of low trust in generic drugs; or (5) did not provide electronic informed consent.
2500
| 1st name | Chenyue |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Huang |
Institute for Health Economics and Policy
Research Department
1050001
3F, Tokyu Toranomon Building, 1-21-19 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
0335068529
shinetsu.ko@ihep.jp
| 1st name | Chenyue |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Huang |
Institute for Health Economics and Policy
Research Department
1050001
3F, Tokyu Toranomon Building, 1-21-19 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
0335068529
shinetsu.ko@ihep.jp
Institute for Health Economics and Policy
Huang Chenyue
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Japanese Governmental office
Japan
Institute for Health Economics and Policy
3F, Tokyu Toranomon Building, 1-21-19 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
0335068529
info@ihep.jp
YES
R6-006
Institute for Health Economics and Policy
| 2026 | Year | 07 | Month | 24 | Day |
The protocol is not publicly available.
Published
The protocol is not publicly available.
2500
[Oral presentation] Huang C, Innami I. An empirical analysis of the effects of nudges on intention to use and uptake of generic drugs. The 19th Annual Meeting of the Association of Behavioral Economics and Finance; December 13, 2025.
| 2026 | Year | 07 | Month | 24 | Day |
The Wave 1 analysis included 2,500 participants: 834 in the loss-framed group, 833 in the gain-framed group, and 833 in the control group. Values are presented below in the order loss-framed/gain-framed/control.
Mean age (SD) was 53.0 (13.0)/53.7 (13.1)/53.7 (12.9) years. The numbers of male participants were 505 (60.6%)/523 (62.8%)/510 (61.2%), and the numbers of female participants were 329 (39.4%)/310 (37.2%)/323 (38.8%).
Educational attainment was below university degree for 508 (61.3%)/498 (60.1%)/473 (57.1%) participants and university degree or higher for 321 (38.7%)/330 (39.9%)/355 (42.9%) participants. Educational attainment was missing for five participants in each group; percentages were calculated among participants with available data.
Annual household income was less than JPY 4 million for 287 (34.4%)/311 (37.3%)/283 (34.0%) participants, JPY 4 million to less than JPY 8 million for 211 (25.3%)/237 (28.5%)/233 (28.0%), JPY 8 million or more for 142 (17.0%)/123 (14.8%)/138 (16.6%), and unknown for 194 (23.3%)/162 (19.4%)/179 (21.5%). The unknown category included responses of "don't know" and "prefer not to answer."
Mean baseline intention to use generic drugs (SD), measured on a five-point scale, was 2.9 (0.8)/2.9 (0.7)/2.9 (0.8). Baseline characteristics were broadly similar across the three groups.
At Wave 1 (15-19 May 2025), 27,744 online panel members were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 25,244 (91.0%) were excluded because they met one or more of the following criteria: aged younger than 18 years, no option to choose a generic drug, currently using generic drugs, or high trust in generic drugs.
The remaining 2,500 eligible participants were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to the loss-framed group (n = 834), gain-framed group (n = 833), or control group (n = 833). All 2,500 randomised participants were included in the Wave 1 intention analysis, with no post-randomisation exclusions.
At Wave 2 (15-19 July 2025), the follow-up survey was closed when the prespecified target of 1,000 completed responses was reached. Respondents comprised 334 participants in the loss-framed group, 333 in the gain-framed group, and 333 in the control group. The remaining 1,500 participants were not included among the completed Wave 2 respondents.
Of the 1,000 Wave 2 respondents, 337 who reported visiting a healthcare provider during the follow-up period were included in the generic drug uptake analysis: 109 in the loss-framed group, 113 in the gain-framed group, and 115 in the control group. The remaining 663 respondents who reported no healthcare visit were excluded from the uptake analysis: 225 in the loss-framed group, 220 in the gain-framed group, and 218 in the control group.
The intervention consisted of a one-time online presentation of an informational message. Adverse events were not prespecified as an outcome or systematically collected. No adverse events were reported in the published article.
The primary outcome was intention to use generic drugs immediately after exposure to the assigned message at Wave 1. Participants rated their agreement with the statement "I would like to use generic drugs" on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"). Responses were dichotomised as intention to use (scores of 4 or 5) or no intention to use (scores of 1-3). Baseline intention was assessed before message exposure using the same item and scale.
The secondary outcome was self-reported generic drug uptake at Wave 2, approximately two months after message exposure. Participants who reported visiting a healthcare provider during the follow-up period were asked whether they were currently using generic drugs. Uptake was assessed on the basis of their responses.
Completed
| 2025 | Year | 03 | Month | 20 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 14 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 05 | Month | 15 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 19 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 19 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 08 | Month | 30 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 07 | Month | 24 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 07 | Month | 24 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000071327