UMIN-ICDS Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000062234
Receipt number R000071001
Scientific Title A Pilot Study on Web-Based Telemedicine Consultations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Kidney Diseases, with a Focus on Designated Intractable Diseases
Date of disclosure of the study information 2026/07/17
Last modified on 2026/07/14 15:37:59

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

A Pilot Study on Web-Based Telemedicine Consultations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Kidney Diseases, with a Focus on Designated Intractable Diseases

Acronym

Remote Consultation Network for Kidney Disease (Kidney Bridge)

Scientific Title

A Pilot Study on Web-Based Telemedicine Consultations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Kidney Diseases, with a Focus on Designated Intractable Diseases

Scientific Title:Acronym

Remote Consultation Network for Kidney Disease (Kidney Bridge)

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

kidney disease

Classification by specialty

Nephrology

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and other renal disorders comprise a wide range of conditions, including designated intractable diseases, and their diagnosis and treatment require a high level of specialized expertise. Kidney specialists tend to be concentrated in major urban hospitals, and access to specialized care and renal pathology diagnosis is particularly limited in rural areas and regions facing physician shortages.

In its Second Five-Year Plan formulated in 2022, the Japanese Society of Nephrology emphasized the development and implementation of support systems for underserved regions through telemedicine and related services. Advances in ICT technologies have further expanded the potential for remote case consultations and the sharing of pathological images.

This study aims to reduce disparities in medical care caused by regional imbalances in the availability of nephrology specialists and renal pathology diagnostic systems. To achieve this, we will develop a remote consultation framework and evaluate its usefulness and feasibility for real-world implementation.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Exploratory

Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

Satisfaction with answers (5-point scale): Calculation of median (IQR).

System usefulness: Descriptive statistics of a 5-point scale.

Educational and clinical decision support effects (5-point scale): Calculation of median (IQR).

Clinical utility: Multiple-choice data will be collected immediately after receiving answers regarding the intended management plan (e.g., "plan to perform additional tests," "consider referral to a specialist," "maintain current plan," "change treatment plan," "information gathering only") and 1 month later regarding actual clinical implementation. The distribution (count and percentage) for each option will be analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Key secondary outcomes

Number of questions, participating medical institutions, and participating physicians: Descriptive statistics.

Inter-rater agreement among specialists' answers: Calculated using Kappa coefficients or equivalent metrics.

Time required for answer preparation and average turnaround time to submission: Mean and standard deviation (SD).

Presence or absence of references appended.

Answerability of question content.


Base

Study type

Observational


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit


Not applicable

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

1. Inclusion Criteria for Questioners
Subjects must meet all of the following:
Status: Physicians practicing in Japan (self-reported; verified via checkbox at informed consent).
Consent: Received study explanation and provided appropriate consent.
Registration: Completed registration after email verification.

Note: Strict credential verification is difficult due to system nature. To prevent non-physician access, the form (URL/QR code) will not be public and will only be shared via:Staff areas in certified facilities (e.g., Japanese Society of Internal Medicine), physician-only websites and the Japan Kidney Association CKD Committee network.

2. Inclusion Criteria for Responders
Physicians must meet all of the following:
Qualifications: Board-certified nephrologists (JSN), board-certified pathologists (JSP), or physicians with equivalent expertise.
Consent: Received study explanation and provided informed consent.
Registration: Completed registration after email verification.

3. Inclusion Criteria for Patients (Pathological Consultation)
Patients must meet all of the following:Target:
Requiring consultation utilizing pathological images.
Consent: Received the URL/QR code from their physician, reviewed the study webpage, and provided informed consent.
Age: Being 18 years of age or older at the time of providing consent.

Note on Roles
An individual may act as both a questioner and a responder, but cannot answer their own questions.

Key exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Individuals who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study or the data analysis.

Investigator's Discretion: Anyone judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in this study.

No Active Participation (Exclusion from Analysis): Questioners who do not post any inquiries regarding renal disease care during the study period (these individuals will be excluded from the data analysis).

Target sample size

5430


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Masaomi
Middle name
Last name Nangaku

Organization

Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo

Division name

Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology

Zip code

1138655

Address

7-3-1,Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

TEL

03-3815-5411

Email

jinnai.research.assist@gmail.com


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Yuka
Middle name
Last name Sugawara

Organization

the University of Tokyo Hospital

Division name

Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology

Zip code

1138655

Address

7-3-1,Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

TEL

03-5800-8969

Homepage URL


Email

ysuga-tky@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

The University of Tokyo

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Japanese Governmental office

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Tokyo

Address

7-3-1,Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Tel

03-5841-0818

Email

ethics@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2026 Year 07 Month 17 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Preinitiation

Date of protocol fixation

2026 Year 06 Month 17 Day

Date of IRB

2026 Year 07 Month 14 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2026 Year 07 Month 27 Day

Last follow-up date

2027 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

Overview: Regional physicians submit nephrology questions (kidney disease diagnosis/treatment, renal pathology) via web form; designated specialists respond through a telemedicine system.
Questioners: Learn of study via facility/society outreach. After consent and email verification, enter attributes (experience, specialty, facility size) and post de-identified questions. Pathology cases require separate patient consent, a study ID, and slide/image submission to the study office. Complete satisfaction surveys after receiving answers.
Respondents: After consent/verification, register credentials (name, affiliation, JSN membership, experience, specialty); JSN office confirms qualification. Upon assignment, submit free-text answers plus structured items (testing recommendations, referral, guideline citations) and self-assessment surveys. Responses reach questioners anonymized; compensation provided.
Pathology patients: Consent via URL/QR code; slides/images sent to office, digitized, shared with respondent, then returned to questioner. Treatment decisions remain with the questioner.
Study office: Recruits specialists via JSN and related societies to build a candidate list; solicits questions via advertising. Screens posts for personal information, inappropriate content, or non-physician origin, deleting as needed. Digitizes pathology slides if needed. Assigns about 3 respondents per question (max 8 per respondent), requesting literature citations; reassigns on decline. Only assigned respondents view question details. Notifies questioners of responses, clarifying these are reference opinions only, with final responsibility resting with the questioner and no attending-physician liability for respondents. Aggregates and analyzes de-identified data.
Discontinuation: Halted on serious security issues or if the PI deems continuation infeasible. Deletion requests are handled individually by the office, with PI approval.


Management information

Registered date

2026 Year 07 Month 14 Day

Last modified on

2026 Year 07 Month 14 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000071001