UMIN-ICDS Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000061906
Receipt number R000070838
Scientific Title Cost-utility analysis of transversus abdominis plane block versus caudal block for pediatric lower abdominal surgery under the current Japanese reimbursement system: a simulation study
Date of disclosure of the study information 2026/06/15
Last modified on 2026/06/15 01:34:32

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

A simulation study comparing cost-effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane block and caudal block in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery

Acronym

Cost-effectiveness analysis of regional anesthesia adjunctive to general anesthesia for pediatric lower abdominal surgery

Scientific Title

Cost-utility analysis of transversus abdominis plane block versus caudal block for pediatric lower abdominal surgery under the current Japanese reimbursement system: a simulation study

Scientific Title:Acronym

CEA of PRB in Japan

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Postoperative pain management in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery

Classification by specialty

Pediatrics Anesthesiology Operative medicine

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To compare general anesthesia plus transversus abdominis plane block with general anesthesia plus caudal block for pediatric lower abdominal surgery and to conduct a cost-utility analysis from the public healthcare payer perspective in Japan. In addition, the study will assess how changes in reimbursement points for nerve block add-on fees affect cost-utility.

Basic objectives2

Others

Basic objectives -Others

Economic evaluation and cost-utility assessment

Trial characteristics_1

Exploratory

Trial characteristics_2

Pragmatic

Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

Incremental cost-utility ratio based on post-operative quality-adjusted life years

Key secondary outcomes

Avoidance of rescue analgesia within 24 hours, expected cost, expected quality-adjusted life years, net monetary benefit, cost-effectiveness acceptability, and threshold reimbursement points for nerve block add-on fees


Base

Study type

Others,meta-analysis etc


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

1 days-old <=

Age-upper limit

18 years-old >

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

A model-based target population of children younger than 18 years undergoing lower abdominal or infraumbilical surgery under general anesthesia with either transversus abdominis plane block or caudal block for postoperative analgesia. Clinical effectiveness parameters will be derived from randomized controlled trials and a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the two techniques.

Key exclusion criteria

Studies involving adults, studies of procedures substantially different from the intended indication such as thoracic surgery or extensive upper abdominal surgery, studies without a valid comparison between the two techniques, and studies in which key model parameters cannot be extracted.

Target sample size

1


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Soichiro
Middle name
Last name Obara

Organization

Teikyo University

Division name

Graduate School of Public Health

Zip code

173-8605

Address

2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN

TEL

03-3964-1211

Email

soichoba1975@gmail.com


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Soichiro
Middle name
Last name Obara

Organization

Teikyo University

Division name

Graduate School of Public Health

Zip code

173-8605

Address

2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN

TEL

03-3964-1211

Homepage URL


Email

soichoba1975@gmail.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

Teikyo University

Institute

Department

Personal name

Soichiro Obara


Funding Source

Organization

self-funding

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization

Japan


Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Teikyo University

Address

2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi, Tokyo

Tel

03-3964-1211

Email

soichoba1975@gmail.com


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

帝京大学 大学院 公衆衛生学研究科


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2026 Year 06 Month 15 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Enrolling by invitation

Date of protocol fixation

2026 Year 03 Month 27 Day

Date of IRB

2027 Year 03 Month 27 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2026 Year 03 Month 27 Day

Last follow-up date

2027 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2027 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2027 Year 06 Month 30 Day

Date analysis concluded

2027 Year 09 Month 30 Day


Other

Other related information

This study is a model-based simulation using only secondary data from published literature, publicly available reimbursement schedules, and official drug price lists. No new participant enrollment, intervention, or collection of personal information will be conducted. The primary analysis is a cost-utility analysis from the public healthcare payer perspective, and the primary outcome is the incremental cost-utility ratio based on post-operative quality-adjusted life years. Clinical effectiveness parameters will be derived from a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing transversus abdominis plane block and caudal block for pediatric lower abdominal surgery. Pain-related utility decrement will be approximated from published data on postoperative health-related quality of life in children.


Management information

Registered date

2026 Year 06 Month 15 Day

Last modified on

2026 Year 06 Month 15 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000070838