| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000062899 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000070813 |
| Scientific Title | Comparative Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Urine Cytology and Ex Vivo Prepared Urine Cytology for the Detection of Urothelial Carcinoma |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/09/14 |
| Last modified on | 2026/09/12 23:50:03 |
A Comparative Study of Methods for Detecting Urothelial Cancer Using Urine Cells
A Comparative Study of Urine Cell-Based Methods for Detecting Urothelial Cancer
Comparative Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Urine Cytology and Ex Vivo Prepared Urine Cytology for the Detection of Urothelial Carcinoma
Diagnostic Performance Comparison Study of Ex Vivo Prepared Urine Cytology
| Japan |
Urothelial carcinoma or suspected urothelial carcinoma
| Urology |
Malignancy
NO
This study will enroll patients with suspected urothelial carcinoma and patients with other urological diseases, including prostate cancer, renal cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and urinary stones, all of whom present with microscopic or gross hematuria. We will compare the diagnostic performance of conventional urine cytology using spontaneously voided urine with that of ex vivo prepared urine cytology, which is generated by applying a proprietary optimized preparation procedure to rare exfoliated cells in voided urine. This study is designed as a Validation Phase study to demonstrate the clinical validity of this technology in a real-world hematuria cohort, using the protocol established in the preceding Development Phase without any modification. Cytological assessment will be conducted by evaluators who are fully blinded to clinical information. The objective is to confirm the usefulness of this method as a novel, minimally invasive pathological diagnostic system for urothelial carcinoma.
Efficacy
Exploratory
Explanatory
Not applicable
Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of conventional urine cytology and ex vivo prepared urine cytology using a strictly defined gold standard* as the reference standard
* To ensure the validity of this diagnostic accuracy study, the reference standard used to determine the true disease status, namely the gold standard, is strictly predefined as follows:
Cancer group: True-positive cases are defined as those in which a definitive diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma is established by pathological evaluation of tissue specimens obtained by surgery or biopsy.
Non-cancer group: True-negative cases are defined as those in which no findings suggestive of urothelial carcinoma are identified through standard clinical evaluations, including transurethral endoscopy, surgery, biopsy, CT/MRI, ultrasonography, or other routine diagnostic work-up, and in which no new onset or diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma is observed during at least 6 months of clinical follow-up. When cases are classified as non-cancer based solely on imaging findings, it is mandatory that MRI shows no intravesical lesion and that ultrasonography shows no findings suggestive of urothelial carcinoma, such as upper urinary tract obstruction or hydronephrosis.
1.Comparison of the specificity of the two tests using the gold standard as the reference standard
2.Determination of the optimal cutoff value based on ROC analysis and comparison of the AUC
3.Comparison of diagnostic performance for bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial carcinoma, respectively
4.Comparison of diagnostic performance according to the pathological grade of urothelial carcinoma, classified as low-grade or high-grade
5.Evaluation of the success rate of novel specimen preparation from spontaneously voided urine
Observational
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
Patients who meet all of the following criteria will be included in this study:
1.Patients who are 18 years of age or older at the time of consent, regardless of sex.
2.Patients in whom gross or microscopic hematuria has been confirmed by recent examination.
3.Patients who are scheduled to undergo imaging studies, transurethral endoscopic evaluation and/or procedures, or surgery for the evaluation or treatment of urothelial carcinoma.
4.Patients who have received sufficient explanation regarding participation in this study, have fully understood the study, and have provided written informed consent of their own free will.
5.Patients who have been informed of their disease name and clinical condition, have the capacity to provide consent, and have provided written informed consent.
Patients who meet any of the following criteria will not be included in this study:
1.Patients who are considered unable to provide informed consent due to dementia, psychiatric disorders, or other conditions.
2.Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were diagnosed based only on urine cytology and imaging studies, without pathological confirmation.
3.Patients who are otherwise judged by the principal investigator to be inappropriate for
100
| 1st name | Takashi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Yoshida |
Kansai Medical University
Department of Urology and Andrology
573-1010
2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka
0728042083
yoshida.tks@kmu.ac.jp
| 1st name | Takashi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Yoshida |
Kansai Medical University
Department of Urology and Andrology
573-1010
2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka
0728042083
yoshida.tks@kmu.ac.jp
Kansai Medical University
None
Self funding
Kansai Medical University Hospital Research Ethics Committee
2-5-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka
(072) 804-2083
rinri@kmu.ac.jp
YES
2026099
Kansai Medical University Hospital Research Ethics
| 2026 | Year | 09 | Month | 14 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2026 | Year | 08 | Month | 05 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 08 | Month | 05 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 08 | Month | 05 | Day |
| 2028 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
This is a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study in patients with hematuria. Using urine samples obtained from the same patients, urine cytology will be performed using the conventional method and an ex vivo preparation method, and the diagnostic performance, particularly sensitivity, will be compared between the two methods. This study involves no intervention or invasive procedures, and cytological evaluation will be performed in a blinded manner.
| 2026 | Year | 09 | Month | 12 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 09 | Month | 12 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000070813