| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000061036 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000069847 |
| Scientific Title | A systematic review of the functionality of "Lactic acid bacteria derived from Sakura(L. paracasei strain shidare)" for improving bowel movement in healthy adults . |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/03/24 |
| Last modified on | 2026/03/24 13:42:47 |
A systematic review of the functionality of "Lactic acid bacteria derived from Sakura(L. paracasei strain shidare)" for improving bowel movement in healthy adults .
A systematic review of the functionality of "Lactic acid bacteria derived from Sakura(L. paracasei strain shidare)" for improving bowel movement in healthy adults
A systematic review of the functionality of "Lactic acid bacteria derived from Sakura(L. paracasei strain shidare)" for improving bowel movement in healthy adults .
A systematic review of the functionality of "Lactic acid bacteria derived from Sakura(L. paracasei strain shidare)" for improving bowel movement in healthy adults .
| Japan |
The subjects were healthy adults (excluding those under 18 years old, pregnant women, and lactating women)
| Adult |
Others
NO
The objective of this study is to investigate whether the intake of "Lactic acid bacteria derived from Sakura(L. paracasei strain shidare)" effect function to improve bowel movement in constipated and healthy adults, including the latest RCTs.
Efficacy
Others
Others
Not applicable
bowel movement diary
Others,meta-analysis etc
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
P-Participant: Participant
The subjects were healthy adults (excluding those under 18 years old, pregnant women, and lactating women)
I-intervention: Intervention (food) characteristics
Continuous intake of "Lactic acid bacteria derived from Sakura (L. paracasei strain shidare)", Unlimited dosage forms, period and follow-up period.
C-Comparison: Comparison
Placebo (The placebo's formulation is not specified)
O-Outcome: Outcome
The primary outcome: bowel movement diary
S-Study design: Randomized parallel group controlled trials, randomized crossover trials, quasi-randomized parallel group controlled trials, quasi-randomized crossover trials, non-randomized parallel group controlled trials, non-randomized crossover trials or open trial
The literature which does not meet PICOS, such as conference abstracts (conference proceedings) that are not original articles will be excluded.
| 1st name | Norihito |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Shimizu |
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
New Products Development Dept. R&D Center
493-8001
1 Aza Numata Kitagata, Kitagata-cho, Ichinomiya-city, Aichi-pref.
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.biglobe.ne.jp
| 1st name | Makiko |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Hashimoto |
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Planning & Solution Development Department Section
493-8001
1 Aza Numata Kitagata, Kitagata-cho, Ichinomiya-city, Aichi-pref.
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.biglobe.ne.jp
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Profit organization
Not applicable
Not applicable
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.biglobe.ne.jp
NO
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 24 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 23 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 25 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 30 | Day |
[Literature search]
Search across 8 databases, and search across Foods with Functional Claims search site (Consumer Affairs Agency) and Functional Foods in Health and Disease as a hand search. The search will be conducted by reviewer A.
[Literature selection and data extraction]
Reviewer A and B will independently screen the literature and extract data based on the eligibility criteria.
[Bias risk assessment]
Evaluation selection bias (randomization, allocation concealment), blinding bias (participants, outcome assessors), attrition bias (ITT/FAS/PPS, incomplete outcome data), selective outcome reporting, other bias, summary and non-directness of individual studies. Assess the risk as "high", "medium/suspected", or "low".
[Certainty Assessment]
Evaluate the risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) for each outcome. These evaluations will be combined to assess the overall certainty of the evidence. The risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) will be assessed in three levels: "high", "medium/suspected", and "low". Certainty will be graded in four levels: A (strong), B (moderate), C (weak), D (very weak).
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 24 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 24 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000069847