| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000059874 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000068468 |
| Scientific Title | Safety of Depth-Adjusted Intravenous Sedation in Office-Based Aesthetic Surgery: A One-Month Prospective Study of 135 Consecutive Cases |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/11/25 |
| Last modified on | 2025/11/25 14:43:35 |
Safety of Depth-Adjusted Intravenous Sedation in Office-Based Aesthetic Surgery:
A One-Month Prospective Study of 135 Consecutive Cases
Safety of Depth-Adjusted Intravenous Sedation in Office-Based Aesthetic Surgery:
A One-Month Prospective Study of 135 Consecutive Cases
Safety of Depth-Adjusted Intravenous Sedation in Office-Based Aesthetic Surgery:
A One-Month Prospective Study of 135 Consecutive Cases
Safety of Depth-Adjusted Intravenous Sedation in Office-Based Aesthetic Surgery:
A One-Month Prospective Study of 135 Consecutive Cases
| Japan |
Cosmetic (aesthetic) indications only; no pathological disease is targeted.
Examples:
Double eyelid surgery
Fat grafting
Lifting procedures
Liposuction
Rhinoplasty
| Anesthesiology | Plastic surgery | Aesthetic surgery |
| Adult |
Others
NO
This study aims to prospectively evaluate the safety and patient-reported outcomes of the Ultra-safe Method for Elective Depth-adjusted Anesthesia (UMEDA protocol) used for office-based aesthetic surgery.
Primary objectives include:
1:Incidence of major cardiopulmonary events
2:Patient satisfaction (5-point Likert scale)
Secondary objectives include intra-operative recall, recovery time, adverse symptoms, and willingness to undergo the same sedation again.
Safety
1. Major cardiopulmonary events
SpO2 < 93% lasting >= 30 seconds
Systolic blood pressure deviation > +/-30% from baseline
Need for urgent airway intervention
2. Patient satisfaction score (1-5)
Intra-operative recall (none / induction-or-emergence only / continuous to binary analysis)
Recovery time (anesthetic stop to exit)
Adverse symptoms (nausea, dizziness, dyspnea, unsteadiness, etc.)
Desire to receive the same sedation again (Yes/No)
Observational
| Not applicable |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
Patients undergoing aesthetic surgery during the study period
ASA-PS I-II
Written informed consent obtained
Intravenous sedation performed using the UMEDA protocol
Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
Known allergy to propofol components (soybean/egg derivatives)
Severe cardiopulmonary or psychiatric disorders deemed inappropriate by investigators
Emergency cases
135
| 1st name | Hiroo |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Teranishi |
Tokyo Chuo Beauty Clinic, Umeda Osaka Ekimae Clinic
Director
5300057
3rd Floor, K's Square Building, 2-8-15 Sonezaki, Kita-ku, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan
0354221566
kiuchi.reiko@tcb.or.jp
| 1st name | Keisuke |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Matsumura |
Tokyo Chuo Beauty Clinic, Umeda Osaka Ekimae Clinic
Tokyo Chuo Beauty Clinic, Umeda Osaka Ekimae Clinic
5300057
3rd Floor, K's Square Building, 2-8-15 Sonezaki, Kita-ku, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan
06-6147-2581
dr.matsumura.keisuke@tcb.or.jp
Tokyo Chuo Beauty Clinic, Umeda Osaka Ekimae Clinic
None
Self funding
TCB Academic Committee and IRB
3rd Floor, K's Square Building, 2-8-15 Sonezaki, Kita-ku, Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan
06-6147-2581
irb@tcb.or.jp
NO
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 25 | Day |
Unpublished
135
Completed
| 2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 26 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 05 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
Methods
Sedation performed using the standardized UMEDA protocol
Propofol bolus 0.8-1.2 mg/kg; maintenance 3-5 mg/kg/h
Target MOAA/S score of 2-3
SpO2 intervention threshold at 93%
Prospective data collection using a structured CRF
Statistical analysis with logistic and linear regression (EZR v1.68)
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 25 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 25 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000068468