| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000059633 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000068208 |
| Scientific Title | A systematic review of the functional role of bilberry-derived anthocyanins in alleviating eye fatigue. |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/11/04 |
| Last modified on | 2025/11/04 13:45:41 |
A systematic review of the functional role of bilberry-derived anthocyanins in alleviating eye fatigue.
A systematic review of the functional role of bilberry-derived anthocyanins in alleviating eye fatigue.
A systematic review of the functional role of bilberry-derived anthocyanins in alleviating eye fatigue.
A systematic review of the functional role of bilberry-derived anthocyanins in alleviating eye fatigue.
| Japan |
Healthy adults
| Adult |
Others
NO
The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional role of bilberry-derived anthocyanins in alleviating eye fatigue.
Efficacy
Others
Others
Relieves eye fatigue by improving the eye's accommodative function (near point distance, accommodative power, and accommodative time).
Effect of relieving eye fatigue based on subjective evaluations (VAS, subjective symptom questionnaires, etc.)
Others,meta-analysis etc
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
P: Participant
The subjects were healthy adults (those who are not suffering from any diseases, excluding those under 18 years old, pregnant women, and lactating women).
I: Intervention(food) characteristics
The intake of ingredients was equivalent to the anthocyanins derived from bilberry used in the final product. There were no restrictions on intake amount, intake period, or follow-up period.
C: Comparison group
Comparisons were made with a placebo group or a control group in which the test food was replaced with a food that did not contain bilberry-derived anthocyanins.
O: Evaluation items
Main outcomes: Relieves eye fatigue by improving the eye's accommodative function (near point distance, accommodative power, and accommodative time).
Secondary outcomes: Effect in relieving eye fatigue based on subjective evaluations (VAS, subjective symptom questionnaires, etc.).
S: Research design
The research designs used in the included literature were randomized parallel-group controlled trials (RCTPs), randomized crossover trials (RCTCOs), and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs).The included studies were written in Japanese or English. In principle, the presentation format was an original paper; however, short reports or summaries were also accepted if the content was clearly specified.Abstracts from academic conference presentations (conference proceedings) were excluded due to insufficient descriptive content.
Whether or not the journal was peer-reviewed was not used as an exclusion criterion.To minimize publication bias, studies with results published in clinical trial registry databases were also included.Regarding gray literature, doctoral theses and reports from government agencies or think tanks were included if their detailed content could be identified.
The literature which does not meet the key inclusion criteria will be excluded.
| 1st name | erika |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | ono |
FANCL Corporation
Functional Food Research Institute
244-0806
12-13, Kamishinano, Totsuka-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa
045-820-3525
gakujutsu_sdi@fancl.co.jp
| 1st name | masakazu |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | katsu |
FANCL Corporation
Functional Food Research Institute
231-8528
89-1, Yamashita-cho, Naka-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa
045-226-1392
gakujutsu_sdi@fancl.co.jp
FANCL Corporation
FANCL Corporation
Profit organization
N/A
N/A
045-226-0797
gakujutsu_sdi@fancl.co.jp
NO
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 04 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 08 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 04 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 12 | Month | 22 | Day |
[Literature search] Search across 12 databases. The search targets studies published from the time the site was first established or installed up to the date of each search. The search will be conducted by researcher E.
[Literature selection and data extraction] Three researchers (A, B, C) will independently screen the literature and extract data based on the eligibility criteria.
[Research quality evaluation] Two researchers (A and B) will independently assess risk of bias and indirectness.
[Incosistency evaluation] The inconsistency is evaluated as high (-2) when the agreement rate is between 50.0% and 59.9%, medium (-1) when it is between 60.0% and 79.9%, and low(0) when it is between 80.0% and 100%. If the number of reports is only one, set it to high (-2) by default.If meta-analysis is possible, it will be assessed using tests of heterogeneity and I2 values.
[Evaluation of imprecision] If the total sample size of the included (synthesized) studies is 100 or more, it is rated as "precise (low (0))", if it is between 40 and 100, it is rated as "slightly imprecise (medium (-1))", and if it is less than 40, it is rated as "inprecise (high (-2))".
[Meta-analysis]If there are multiple references and no heterogeneity is detected, A and B will conduct a meta-analysis using the free software RevMan5 or EZR. Forest plots will be used to test for heterogeneity, and funnel plots will be employed to clarify publication bias in the synthesis.
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 04 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 04 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000068208