| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000059549 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000068101 |
| Scientific Title | Effects of a 12-week wearable accelerometer-based feedback and behavior change techniques (BCTs) intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns among community-dwelling older women. |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/10/27 |
| Last modified on | 2025/10/27 12:43:06 |
A 12-week study using wearable devices and behavior change coaching to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary time in older women
Wearable Device and BCTs for Activity in Older Women
Effects of a 12-week wearable accelerometer-based feedback and behavior change techniques (BCTs) intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns among community-dwelling older women.
Effects of a 12-week wearable accelerometer-based feedback and behavior
| Asia(except Japan) |
Healthy, community-dwelling older women
| Geriatrics | Adult |
Others
NO
To examine whether a 12-week intervention combining wearable device (accelerometer) feedback with behavior change techniques (BCTs) can increase physical activity and modify sedentary behavior patterns among community-dwelling older women.
Efficacy
Exploratory
Explanatory
Not applicable
1. Change from baseline (0-week) to post-intervention (12-weeks) in accelerometer-measured Total Physical Activity (LPA + MVPA), measured in minutes per day.
2. Change from baseline (0-week) to post-intervention (12-weeks) in accelerometer-measured frequency of 30-minute sedentary bouts.
1. Change from baseline (0-week) to post-intervention (12-weeks) in accelerometer-measured daily walking steps.
2. Change from baseline (0-week) to post-intervention (12-weeks) in accelerometer-measured Light Physical Activity (LPA), in minutes/day.
3. Change from baseline (0-week) to post-intervention (12-weeks) in accelerometer-measured Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA), in minutes/day.
4. Change from baseline (0-week) to post-intervention (12-weeks) in accelerometer-measured total Sedentary Time (ST), in minutes/day.
5. Change from baseline (0-week) to post-intervention (12-weeks) in accelerometer-measured total time (minutes) in 30-minute sedentary bouts.
6. Change from baseline (0-week) to post-intervention (12-weeks) in accelerometer-measured number of 1-minute sedentary breaks per day.
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Central registration
2
Educational,Counseling,Training
| Device,equipment | Behavior,custom |
Arm 1: Intervention Group (IG)
Duration: 12 weeks Intervention: A multi-component intervention combining wearable accelerometer feedback (ActiGraph GT3X+) with behavior change techniques (BCTs). Details:
Wearable Device Monitoring: Participants used an ActiGraph GT3X+ to track physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST).
Step Count Goal: Encouraged to walk at least 7,000 steps per day.
Exercise Planning and Consultation: Received weekly guidance on exercise planning and personalized prescriptions from an expert coach.
Health Belief Model Education: Attended weekly sessions to identify and overcome barriers to a healthy lifestyle.
Sedentary Behavior Reduction: Introduced to strategies for replacing sedentary behavior (SB) with light physical activity (LPA), reinforced by weekly education on SB health risks and daily text messages from an expert via a social media group.
Arm 2: Control Group (CG) Duration: 12 weeks
Intervention: Active control receiving health-related information. Details: Participants attended courses on various healthy aging topics, including fall prevention, arthritis, bone health, cognitive function, social engagement, depression, stress management, sleep, and healthy eating. These courses were designed to maintain motivation but did not include cognitive education or behavioral strategies aimed at increasing PA or reducing SB.
| 65 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Female
1. Aged 65 or older
2. Residing in the community (excluding geriatric care institutions)
3. Self-identified as not engaging in strength training or meeting the recommended 150 minutes of moderate-intensity PA per week over the past three months
4. Willing to wear a wearable device on the waist
5. Able to walk independently without assistance
6. Possessing normal or corrected-to-normal vision
1. Having a fall-related fracture within the past year
2. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of less than 24
3. Presence of diseases or physical frailty, such as cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological conditions
4. Functional and movement limitations that could interfere with participation in the study
48
| 1st name | Ming-Chun |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Hsueh |
University of Taipei
Institute of Sport Pedagogy
11036
No. 101, Sec. 2, Zhongcheng Rd., Shilin Dist., Taipei City 111036, Taiwan
8862287182885902
boxeo@utaipei.edu.tw
| 1st name | Ming-Chun |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Hsueh |
University of Taipei
Institute of Sport Pedagogy
11036
No. 101, Sec. 2, Zhongcheng Rd., Shilin Dist., Taipei City 111036, Taiwan
8862287182885902
boxeo@utaipei.edu.tw
University of Taipei
National Science and Technology Council and Technology of Taiwan
Government offices of other countries
Taiwan
University of Taipei
Research and Development Office
University of Taipei Human Research Ethics Committee
(Administration Building 2F), No. 101, Sec. 2, Zhongcheng Rd., Shilin Dist., Taipei City 111036, Taiwan
8862287182887812
irb-iacuc@go.utaipei.edu.tw
YES
IRB-2021-090
University of Taipei review board
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 27 | Day |
Manuscript under review; URL will be provided upon publication
Unpublished
Manuscript under review; URL will be provided upon publication
42
After 12 weeks, the intervention group showed significant improvements compared to the control group in: total physical activity (F=30.31, p=.000), daily walking steps (F=7.10, p=.011), frequency of 30-min sedentary bouts (F=40.75, p=.000), and total time in 30-min sedentary bouts (F=39.00, p=.000). There were no significant group differences in LPA, MVPA, total sedentary time (ST), or the number of 1-min sedentary breaks.
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 25 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 25 | Day |
A total of 42 older women completed the study (Intervention Group, IG, n=22; Control Group, CG, n=20). The mean age of all participants was 73.25 (SD 4.39) years and BMI was 22.82 (SD 2.48). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Initially, 74 individuals were recruited. 55 were assessed for eligibility, and 7 were excluded. 48 participants were randomized. Intervention Group (n=24): 2 participants dropped out (1 loss of interest, 1 incomplete information); 22 were analyzed. Control Group (n=24): 4 participants dropped out (1 loss of interest, 1 refused post-tests, 1 injured, 1 incomplete information); 20 were analyzed
There is no adverse event.
Data reported as Intervention Group (IG) vs. Control Group (CG) adjusted 12-week means:
Total PA (min/day): Significant (p=.000). IG: 339.28; CG: 318.02.
Daily steps: Significant (p=.011). IG: 8198.12; CG: 6758.07.
ST 30-min frequency: Significant (p=.000). IG: 2.01; CG: 4.21.
ST 30-min total time (min): Significant (p=.000). IG: 80.95; CG: 183.95.
LPA (min/day): Not significant (p=.360).
MVPA (min/day): Not significant (p=.079).
ST (min/day): Not significant (p=.063).
1-min sedentary breaks: Not significant (p=.054).
Yes
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
No longer recruiting
| 2022 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 09 | Month | 27 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 29 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 12 | Month | 06 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 27 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 27 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000068101