| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000055843 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000063794 |
| Scientific Title | The effect of oral intake of sulforaphane glucosinolate on the maintenance and improvement of cognitive function -An updated systematic review with meta-analysis |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/11/30 |
| Last modified on | 2024/10/11 16:49:54 |
The effect of oral intake of sulforaphane glucosinolate on the maintenance and improvement of cognitive function
-An updated systematic review with meta-analysis
The effect of sulforaphane glucosinolate on cognitive function
-An updated systematic review with meta-analysis
The effect of oral intake of sulforaphane glucosinolate on the maintenance and improvement of cognitive function
-An updated systematic review with meta-analysis
The effect of sulforaphane glucosinolate on cognitive function
-An updated systematic review with meta-analysis
| Japan |
Healthy adult
| Medicine in general | Adult |
Others
NO
To evaluate whether oral intake of foods containing SGS maintains and improves cognitive function in healthy adults compared to oral intake of placebo foods that do not contain SGS or no intervention.
Efficacy
Others
Others
Not applicable
Indicators of processing speed within cognitive function
Indicators of cognitive functions other than processing speed
Others,meta-analysis etc
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
(PICO)
Participant:
Adults without illness (excluding pregnant women ,
women who plan to become pregnant, and lactating women)
Intervention:
Oral intake of foods containing SGS (regardless of the form of intake)
Comparison:
Oral intake of placebo foods that do not contain SGS, or no intervention
Outcome:
Maintenance and improvement of cognitive function at the final evaluation point
Study design:
Randomized controlled parallel trials (RCT-P), randomized controlled crossover trials (RCT-C), quasi-randomized controlled parallel trials (qRCT-P), quasirandomized controlled crossover trials (qRCT-C), non-randomized controlled parallel trials (nonRCT-P), non-randomized controlled crossover trials (nonRCT-C), and non-randomized controlled trials
(Language)
Eligibility is not restricted by language.
Studies that do not aim to evaluate cognitive function, and studies that assess the safety of excessive intake by having subjects consume large amounts of SGS in a short period, are excluded due to differing objectives.Exclude proceedings and unpublished studies which don't give us enough research details, and other gray documents that are difficult to verify.
| 1st name | Shingo |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Takahashi |
KAGOME CO., LTD.
Diet & Well-being Research Institute
329-2762
17 Nishitomiyama, Nasushiobara-shi, Tochigi
0287-36-2935
g167_0@kagome.co.jp
| 1st name | Shohei |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Satomi |
KAGOME CO., LTD.
Diet & Well-being Research Institute
329-2762
17 Nishitomiyama, Nasushiobara-shi, Tochigi
0287-36-2935
g167_0@kagome.co.jp
KAGOME CO., LTD.
None
Self funding
Kagome CO.,LTD. Research Ethics Review Committee
3-21-1 Nihonbashihamacho. chuo-ku, Tokyo
03-5623-8501
Takuji_Hayakawa@kagome.co.jp
NO
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 30 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2024 | Year | 09 | Month | 05 | Day |
| 2024 | Year | 10 | Month | 15 | Day |
| 2024 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
(Search strategy)
Research papers and clinical trial registrations will be searched for 7 databases from the beginning of each database to the search date by reviewers A and B.
(Selection and data collection process)
Screening and data extraction based on eligibility criteria (PICOS) will be conducted independently by reviewers A and B. Disagreements and uncertainties will be resolved by discussion between reviewers A and B or final decision by reviewer C.
(Risk of bias assessment)
Assessment of the quality and evaluation of the indirectness of articles will be conducted independently by reviewers A and B. A full quality appraisal of these papers will be made using modified check list (13 items) of Cochrane Handbook for interventional trials. Disagreements and uncertainties will be resolved by discussion between reviewers A and B or final decision by reviewer C. the agreement rate and the kappa coefficient will be calculated to determine the degree of agreement. Studies evaluated as having a high risk of bias will not be adopted.
(Indirectness evaluation)
It will be evaluated independently by two reviewers.
(Data synthesis)
A meta-analysis will be performed using EZR 1.55 or RevMan 5.4.1 by reviewer A after confirming the absence of heterogeneity. Studies with missing or uncertain data will be excluded if no data is available by contacting the author. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis will be performed as necessary.
(Imprecision assessment)
Imprecision will be assessed based on the total number of participants in all included studies.
(Inconsistency evaluation)
Inconsistency will be evaluated for the I square value and by statistical test for heterogeneity of effect estimates in a meta-analysis.
(Publication bias)
It will be assessed from Funnel plot in a meta-analysis.
(Review team)
SS, AT, ST (KAGOME CO., LTD.)
| 2024 | Year | 10 | Month | 15 | Day |
| 2024 | Year | 10 | Month | 11 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000063794