| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000055209 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000063085 |
| Scientific Title | Assessing the Effects of Integrated Mindfulness and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Internet Gaming Disorder among Chinese College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2024/08/09 |
| Last modified on | 2026/08/04 16:02:30 |
Assessing the Effects of Integrated Mindfulness and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Internet Gaming Disorder among Chinese College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Assessing the Effects of Integrated Mindfulness and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Internet Gaming Disorder among Chinese College Students
Assessing the Effects of Integrated Mindfulness and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Internet Gaming Disorder among Chinese College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Assessing the Effects of Integrated Mindfulness and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Internet Gaming Disorder among Chinese College Students
| Asia(except Japan) |
Internet Gaming Disorder
| Not applicable | Adult |
Others
NO
The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) among Chinese university students and to explore various underlying factors such as gaming motivations and psychological factors. The aim is to facilitate the early detection and prevention of IGD in university students. Additionally, the study seeks to develop effective intervention programs and create a treatment manual that can be used by other therapists to promote the adaptation of university students to real-life situations.
Efficacy
Severity of Internet Gaming Disorder
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
No treatment
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
2
Treatment
| Behavior,custom |
A structured five-session intervention program based on cognitive-behavioral therapy
No treatment control1
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| 35 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
Participants who meet the cutoff score of 20 or above on the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale.
Ability to understand the purpose of the study and provide informed consent for participation.
University students who are receiving treatment for mental disorders.
University students with severe cognitive impairments and physiological diseases.
44
| 1st name | Nobuaki |
| Middle name | N/A |
| Last name | Morita |
Tsukuba University
Department of Social Psychiatry and Mental Health,
305-0006
1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan Tsukuba University Comprehensive Research Building D743
81-29-853-3099
nobumori@md.tsukuba.ac.jp
| 1st name | Ruoyu |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Zhou |
Tsukuba University
Doctoral Program in Human Care Science, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences
305-0006
1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Tsukuba University, Comprehensive Research Building, Room D743
08064248612
zhouruoyu86@gmail.com
Tsukuba University
Ruoyu zhou
Tsukuba University
Other
Tsukuba University
1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Tsukuba University, Comprehensive Research Building, Room D743
08064248612
zhouruoyu86@gmail.com
NO
| 2024 | Year | 08 | Month | 09 | Day |
https://hdl.handle.net/2241/0002017410
Partially published
https://hdl.handle.net/2241/0002017410
63
Analyses included 44 completers (intervention, n=21; control, n=23). A significant group-by-time interaction was observed for IGD symptoms. The between-group difference in change favored the intervention immediately after treatment, whereas no significant between-group difference was found at the one-month follow-up. No clear group-by-time interactions were observed for the other psychological or motivational outcomes.
| 2026 | Year | 08 | Month | 04 | Day |
| Delay expected |
The trial results were included in a doctoral dissertation and made publicly available through the university institutional repository. Posting the results in UMIN-CTR was delayed because additional analyses, manuscript preparation and revision, and journal submission required more time than expected. The delay was not related to concerns about the study findings or participant safety.
The primary analysis included 44 participants: 21 in the intervention group and 23 in the control group. Mean age was 19.66 years (SD=0.73) in the intervention group and 19.65 years (SD=1.23) in the control group. The intervention group included 10 men (47.6%) and 11 women (52.4%); the control group included 6 men (26.1%) and 17 women (73.9%). Baseline IGD scores were 25.86 (SD=5.09) and 23.74 (SD=4.75), respectively, with no significant between-group difference.
Sixty-five individuals were assessed for eligibility, and two were excluded because they did not meet the eligibility criteria. Sixty-three participants were randomized to the intervention group (n=31) or control group (n=32). In the intervention group, 10 participants were excluded from the primary analysis because of insufficient attendance at the scheduled intervention sessions or incomplete assessments, leaving 21 participants for analysis. In the control group, 9 participants did not complete all assessments, leaving 23 participants for analysis. The completer analysis therefore included 44 participants. Post-intervention and one-month follow-up outcome data were unavailable for the 19 participants who discontinued after randomization.
No serious or other reported adverse events related to the intervention were observed during the study period.
The primary outcome was the IGD score. In a linear mixed effects model based on 44 completers, the overall group by time interaction was significant. The likelihood ratio chi square value was 14.03 with 2 degrees of freedom, and p was less than 0.001. From baseline to immediately after the intervention, the mean change was -2.86 points in the intervention group and 2.30 points in the control group. The between group difference in change was -5.16 points, with a 95 percent confidence interval from -7.81 to -2.51, p less than 0.001, and Hedges g of -1.03. From baseline to the one month follow up, the between group difference in change was -1.67 points, with a 95 percent confidence interval from -4.31 to 0.98 and p equal to 0.217. This difference was not statistically significant. No significant group by time interactions were observed for K6 psychological distress, self esteem, self control, or the motivational outcomes. This was a completer analysis, and a full intention to treat analysis could not be conducted.
No plan to share individual participant data.
No longer recruiting
| 2024 | Year | 02 | Month | 14 | Day |
| 2024 | Year | 06 | Month | 04 | Day |
| 2024 | Year | 06 | Month | 10 | Day |
| 2024 | Year | 08 | Month | 10 | Day |
| 2024 | Year | 08 | Month | 09 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 08 | Month | 04 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000063085