UMIN試験ID | UMIN000044623 |
---|---|
受付番号 | R000050668 |
科学的試験名 | 抗がん剤臨床試験における検出バイアス:メタ疫学研究 |
一般公開日(本登録希望日) | 2021/06/22 |
最終更新日 | 2023/08/28 08:40:13 |
日本語
抗がん剤臨床試験における検出バイアス:メタ疫学研究
英語
Detection bias in open-label trials of cancer drug: a meta-epidemiologic study
日本語
抗がん剤臨床試験における検出バイアス:メタ疫学研究
英語
Detection bias in open-label trials of cancer drug: a meta-epidemiologic study
日本語
抗がん剤臨床試験における検出バイアス:メタ疫学研究
英語
Detection bias in open-label trials of cancer drug: a meta-epidemiologic study
日本語
抗がん剤臨床試験における検出バイアス:メタ疫学研究
英語
Detection bias in open-label trials of cancer drug: a meta-epidemiologic study
日本/Japan | アジア(日本以外)/Asia(except Japan) |
北米/North America | 南米/South America |
オセアニア/Australia | 欧州/Europe |
アフリカ/Africa |
日本語
抗がん剤治療の非盲検化試験で、盲検化・非盲検化評価者によりアウトカムを評価している試験。
英語
Open-label trials of cancer drug assessed by both blinded and nonblinded adjudicators.
該当せず/Not applicable |
悪性腫瘍/Malignancy
いいえ/NO
日本語
抗がん剤の非盲検化臨床試験における、検出バイアスを評価すること。
英語
To evaluate detection bias in open-label trials of cancer drugs.
その他/Others
日本語
なし
英語
No
探索的/Exploratory
実務的/Pragmatic
該当せず/Not applicable
日本語
無増悪生存期間に対する盲検化ハザード比と非盲検化ハザード比の比(ratio of hazard ratio: RHR)
英語
Ratio of hazard ratio (RHR: HRnonblinded by HRblinded) of progression free survival (PFS)
日本語
客観的奏功率に対する盲検化オッズ比と非盲検化オッズ比の比(ratio of odds ratio: ROR)
英語
Ratio of odds ratio (ROR: ORnonblinded by ORblinded) of objective response ratio (ORR)
その他・メタアナリシス等/Others,meta-analysis etc
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
適用なし/Not applicable |
適用なし/Not applicable |
男女両方/Male and Female
日本語
抗がん剤治療効果の評価のための非盲検化優劣性デザインによるランダム化比較試験。対象とするがんは乳がん、肺がん、大腸がん、前立腺がん、胃がん、腎癌とする。
英語
Randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group superiority trials investigating the efficacy of anticancer agents. Included cancers are focused on breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, stomach and kidney cancers.
日本語
盲検化デザイン、非劣勢試験、同等性試験、単群試験。
英語
Blinded, non-inferiority, equivalence, and single-arm trials.
0
日本語
名 | 船田 |
ミドルネーム | |
姓 | 哲 |
英語
名 | Satoshi |
ミドルネーム | Funada |
姓 | Funada |
日本語
京都大学
英語
Kyoto University
日本語
京都大学大学院 医学研究科 社会健康医学系専攻 健康増進・行動学分野
英語
Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University School of Public Health
606-8501
日本語
京都市左京区吉田近衛町
英語
Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
075-753-9492
sfunada@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
日本語
名 | 船田 |
ミドルネーム | |
姓 | 哲 |
英語
名 | Satoshi |
ミドルネーム | Funada |
姓 | Funada |
日本語
京都大学
英語
Kyoto University
日本語
京都大学大学院 医学研究科 社会健康医学系専攻 健康増進・行動学分野
英語
Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University School of Public Health
606-8501
日本語
京都市左京区吉田近衛町
英語
Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
075-753-9492
sfunada@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
日本語
その他
英語
Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University School of Public Health
日本語
京都大学
日本語
日本語
英語
日本語
無し
英語
No
日本語
なし
日本語
自己調達/Self funding
日本語
日本
英語
Japan
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
京都大学大学院医学研究科・医学部及び医学部附属病院 医の倫理委員会
英語
Kyoto University Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, Ethics Committee
日本語
京都市左京区吉田近衛町
英語
Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
075-753-4680
ethcom@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
いいえ/NO
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
2021 | 年 | 06 | 月 | 22 | 日 |
https://osf.io/csx7h/
最終結果が公表されている/Published
https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2023/08/16/bmjebm-2023-112332.long
114
日本語
We retrieved 1197 records of oncological open-label trials after full-text screening. We identified 171 records (PFS: 149 records, ORR: 136 records) in which both central reviewers and local investigators were used, and included 114 records (PFS: 92 records, ORR: 74 records) for meta-analyses. While the RHR for PFS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.98), the ROR of ORR was 1.00 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.09). The results remained unchanged in the prespecified sensitivity analysis.
英語
We retrieved 1197 records of oncological open-label trials after full-text screening. We identified 171 records (PFS: 149 records, ORR: 136 records) in which both central reviewers and local investigators were used, and included 114 records (PFS: 92 records, ORR: 74 records) for meta-analyses. While the RHR for PFS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.98), the ROR of ORR was 1.00 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.09). The results remained unchanged in the prespecified sensitivity analysis.
2023 | 年 | 08 | 月 | 28 | 日 |
日本語
英語
日本語
The analysis included 114 records, 92 for PFS and 74 for ORR. The majority of the trials were phase III (n=74); the most common tumour types were non-small cell lung cancer (n=29), breast cancer (n=22) and renal cell cancer (n=14); and the most common type of drug was targeted therapy (n=70). PFS was the primary outcome in 82 records, whereas ORR was the primary outcome in 13. Most of the reports were from high-impact factor (>10) journals (n=102), with only 5 funded by the public sector.
英語
The analysis included 114 records, 92 for PFS and 74 for ORR. The majority of the trials were phase III (n=74); the most common tumour types were non-small cell lung cancer (n=29), breast cancer (n=22) and renal cell cancer (n=14); and the most common type of drug was targeted therapy (n=70). PFS was the primary outcome in 82 records, whereas ORR was the primary outcome in 13. Most of the reports were from high-impact factor (>10) journals (n=102), with only 5 funded by the public sector.
日本語
We identified 6339 records, 1517 of which were eligible after screening titles and abstracts. From 1517 records, we retrieved 1197 eligible records after full-text screening and assessed the adjudicators of PFS and ORR. A total of 181 records (PFS: 157 records, ORR: 141 records) were adjudicated by both central reviewers and local investigators (online supplemental table 1), and the trend of the prevalence of outcome adjudicators did not change from 2010 to 2021 in both PFS (online supplemental figure 2) and ORR (online supplemental figure 3). Of the 181 records, we excluded 10 due to data duplication and included the remaining records that could extract the outcomes adjudicated by both central reviewers and local investigators. Finally, we included 114 records in this analysis, of which 92 were analysed for PFS and 74 for ORR. In other words, among the records that we judged were adjudicated by both central reviewers and local investigators for PFS, only 61.7% (92/149) reported results from both assessors and 54.4% (74/136) for ORR. Online supplemental materials list the exclusion criteria for records during the full-text screening stage (n=320), data extraction stage (n=57) and duplication records stage (n=10). We sent 121 emails to the corresponding authors to request details of the data (26 October 2022) and received 15 responses, of which only one provided sufficient information. The other 14 corresponding authors stated that they could not access the data.
英語
We identified 6339 records, 1517 of which were eligible after screening titles and abstracts. From 1517 records, we retrieved 1197 eligible records after full-text screening and assessed the adjudicators of PFS and ORR. A total of 181 records (PFS: 157 records, ORR: 141 records) were adjudicated by both central reviewers and local investigators (online supplemental table 1), and the trend of the prevalence of outcome adjudicators did not change from 2010 to 2021 in both PFS (online supplemental figure 2) and ORR (online supplemental figure 3). Of the 181 records, we excluded 10 due to data duplication and included the remaining records that could extract the outcomes adjudicated by both central reviewers and local investigators. Finally, we included 114 records in this analysis, of which 92 were analysed for PFS and 74 for ORR. In other words, among the records that we judged were adjudicated by both central reviewers and local investigators for PFS, only 61.7% (92/149) reported results from both assessors and 54.4% (74/136) for ORR. Online supplemental materials list the exclusion criteria for records during the full-text screening stage (n=320), data extraction stage (n=57) and duplication records stage (n=10). We sent 121 emails to the corresponding authors to request details of the data (26 October 2022) and received 15 responses, of which only one provided sufficient information. The other 14 corresponding authors stated that they could not access the data.
日本語
NA
英語
NA
日本語
Ratio of hazard ratio (RHR)
Ratio of odds ratio (ROR)
英語
Ratio of hazard ratio (RHR)
Ratio of odds ratio (ROR)
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
試験終了/Completed
2021 | 年 | 06 | 月 | 25 | 日 |
2021 | 年 | 06 | 月 | 25 | 日 |
2021 | 年 | 07 | 月 | 01 | 日 |
2022 | 年 | 03 | 月 | 31 | 日 |
日本語
ランダム効果モデルを仮定した逆分散法によるRHRとRORのメタ解析を主解析とする。感度解析、サブグループ解析も行う。
英語
We will perform a meta-analysis of RHR and ROR with inverse variance methods using a random-effect model. We will also perform sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis.
2021 | 年 | 06 | 月 | 22 | 日 |
2023 | 年 | 08 | 月 | 28 | 日 |
日本語
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050668
英語
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050668