| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000061277 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000070113 |
| Scientific Title | Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of AI-Generated Medical Literature Summaries: A Single-Blind Comparative Study with Conventional Secondary Sources |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/04/17 |
| Last modified on | 2026/04/16 12:00:36 |
Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of AI-Generated Medical Literature Summaries: A Single-Blind Comparative Study with Conventional Secondary Sources
Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of AI-Generated Medical Literature Summaries: A Single-Blind Comparative Study with Conventional Secondary Sources
Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of AI-Generated Medical Literature Summaries: A Single-Blind Comparative Study with Conventional Secondary Sources
Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of AI-Generated Medical Literature Summaries: A Single-Blind Comparative Study with Conventional Secondary Sources
| Japan |
General medical conditions (Primary care topics)
| Medicine in general |
Others
NO
The objective of this study is to compare and evaluate the clinical utility of summaries generated by the AI tool NotebookLM with those provided by UpToDate, the gold standard in clinical practice, among physicians in general medicine.
Efficacy
Comparison of clinical acceptability as assessed by participants using a 5-point Likert scale.
Comparison of usability and perceived safety as assessed by participants using 5-point Likert scales, and comparison of the accuracy of source identification.
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Single blind -participants are blinded
Active
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Numbered container method
2
Educational,Counseling,Training
| Other |
Group for evaluating Set A:Participants evaluate the utility of 20 Japanese-translated medical literature summaries:
1. Control (10 items): Original UpToDate summaries in text format.
2. Intervention (10 items): Summaries generated by NotebookLM using UpToDate's references as sources, following UpToDate's original structure and style.
Group for evaluating Set B:
Participants evaluate 20 Japanese-translated summaries where the assignment of "Intervention" and "Control" is the inverse of Set A for each clinical topic.
| 20 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
1. Physicians belonging to the Department of General Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital
2. Individuals who have provided voluntary written informed consent after receiving a thorough explanation of this study
Individuals who are judged by the principal investigator to be inappropriate for participation in this study.
24
| 1st name | Arisa |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Hayashi |
Dokkyo Medical University
Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine
321-0293
880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-machi, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan
0282-87-2498
arisa.hayashi211@gmail.com
| 1st name | Arisa |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Hayashi |
Dokkyo Medical University
Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine
321-0293
880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-machi, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan
0282-87-2498
arisa.hayashi211@gmail.com
Dokkyo Medical University
self funding
Self funding
Japan
The Ethics Committee of Dokkyo Medical University
880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-machi, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi, Japan
0282-87-2275
r-kenkyu@dokkyomed.ac.jp
NO
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 17 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 23 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 23 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 25 | Day |
| 2027 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 16 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 16 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000070113