UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000061233
Receipt number R000070072
Scientific Title beta-trace protein concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and epidural aspirates: a prospective observational study
Date of disclosure of the study information 2026/04/12
Last modified on 2026/04/12 02:20:37

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

beta-trace protein concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and epidural aspirates: a prospective observational study

Acronym

beta-trace protein concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and epidural aspirates: a prospective observational study

Scientific Title

beta-trace protein concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and epidural aspirates: a prospective observational study

Scientific Title:Acronym

beta-trace protein concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and epidural aspirates: a prospective observational study

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Differentiation of cerebrospinal fluid and epidural fluid

Classification by specialty

Anesthesiology Adult

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of beta-trace protein (BTP) for distinguishing cerebrospinal fluid from epidural fluid.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

The diagnostic performance of beta-trace protein (BTP) concentration in differentiating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from epidural fluid, assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity).

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Observational


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

75 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

Patients aged 20 to 75 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia with epidural analgesia or spinal anesthesia, and from whom epidural aspirates or cerebrospinal fluid samples could be collected for analysis.

Key exclusion criteria

Patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria, those in whom epidural aspirates or cerebrospinal fluid samples could not be obtained, and those judged by the investigators to be inappropriate for participation.

Target sample size

80


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Misuzu
Middle name
Last name Hayashi

Organization

University of the Ryukyus Hospital

Division name

Department of Anesthesiology

Zip code

901-2725

Address

1076 Kiyuna, Ginowan City, Okinawa, Japan

TEL

098-894-1301

Email

hayashi_fggz@cs.u-ryukyu.ac.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Misuzu
Middle name
Last name Hayashi

Organization

University of the Ryukyus Hospital

Division name

Department of Anesthesiology

Zip code

02478

Address

1076 Kiyuna, Ginowan City, Okinawa, Japan

TEL

098-894-1301

Homepage URL


Email

hayashi_fggz@cs.u-ryukyu.ac.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

University of the Ryukyus Hospital

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

This study received no external funding.

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

the Ethics Committee of the University of the Ryukyus for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects

Address

1 Senbaru, Nishihara-cho, Nakagami-gun, Okinawa, Japan

Tel

098-894-1365

Email

krinken@acs.u-ryukyu.ac.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2026 Year 04 Month 12 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

N/A (protocol not publicly available)

Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications

Not available (results not yet publicly available)

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

80

Results

A total of 80 participants were enrolled. beta-trace protein (BTP) concentrations were higher in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) than in epidural samples, demonstrating clear discrimination between the groups.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that BTP showed superior diagnostic performance compared with glucose and total protein.

Results date posted

2026 Year 04 Month 12 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics

The study included adult patients aged 20 to 75 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II. Participants were divided into two groups: patients undergoing epidural catheter placement and those undergoing spinal anesthesia. No significant differences in baseline demographic characteristics were observed between groups.

Participant flow

A total of 80 participants were enrolled in the study. Seventy-four participants were assigned to the epidural group, and 6 participants were assigned to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) group.

Epidural aspirates were successfully obtained from 20 participants in the epidural group. All participants in the CSF group provided cerebrospinal fluid samples for analysis.

All collected samples were included in the final analysis.

Adverse events

No adverse events related to the study procedures were observed.

Outcome measures

The diagnostic accuracy of beta-trace protein (BTP) concentration for distinguishing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from epidural aspirates, assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Diagnostic performance of glucose and total protein concentrations for distinguishing CSF from epidural samples
Determination of optimal cutoff values for each biomarker
Correlation between time from epidural drug administration to sampling and biomarker concentrations in epidural aspirates

Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2019 Year 11 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB

2019 Year 11 Month 01 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2019 Year 11 Month 11 Day

Last follow-up date

2020 Year 04 Month 30 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

This was a prospective observational study. No interventions were assigned to participants. Epidural aspirates and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected as part of routine clinical procedures, and biomarker concentrations, including beta-trace protein (BTP), glucose, and total protein, were measured and compared between groups. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.


Management information

Registered date

2026 Year 04 Month 12 Day

Last modified on

2026 Year 04 Month 12 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000070072