| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000061237 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000070070 |
| Scientific Title | A two-center prospective observational cohort study comparing 14-day treatment continuity of PICC versus subcutaneous route in hospitalized cancer patients receiving palliative care |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/04/13 |
| Last modified on | 2026/04/11 15:17:38 |
A two-center prospective observational study of treatment continuity with PICC versus subcutaneous route in hospitalized cancer patients receiving palliative care
PICC-SC study
A two-center prospective observational cohort study comparing 14-day treatment continuity of PICC versus subcutaneous route in hospitalized cancer patients receiving palliative care
PICC-SC study
| Japan |
Cancer
| Not applicable |
Malignancy
NO
To compare 14-day treatment continuity in real-world practice between peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and subcutaneous route (SC) selected as the main route of administration in hospitalized cancer patients who required an additional route because peripheral venous access was difficult or expected to become difficult.
Safety,Efficacy
Treatment continuity over 14 days. This is defined as maintenance of the selected main route from Day 0 (the day SC or PICC started as the main route) through Day 14 without access-related failure.
Observational
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
Cancer patients aged 18 years or older receiving palliative care.
Patients judged clinically to have difficulty in securing peripheral venous access, or expected to have such difficulty in the near future, and requiring continuation of injectable treatment.
Patients for whom either PICC or the subcutaneous route (SC) is considered a clinically appropriate option, and whose attending physician selected one of these routes (initiation of SC or PICC order/insertion).
The presence or absence of an implanted port is not restricted; however, only patients in whom the attending physician judged that the port alone was insufficient to continue the main injectable treatment of interest, or that an additional route was clinically necessary, and who were newly selected for PICC or SC, are eligible.
Patients in whom stable injectable treatment can be continued via peripheral venous access and for whom PICC or SC is not clinically considered.
Patients with a PICC already inserted by another department or service and already being continuously used as the main route for injectable treatment at the time of study allocation.
Patients with an absolute contraindication to PICC insertion, such as obvious infection at the planned insertion site, known deep vein thrombosis of the intended upper extremity or severe venous obstruction, uncontrolled major bleeding risk, or explicit patient refusal.
Patients who expressed refusal to participate in the study through the opt-out process.
900
| 1st name | Noriyuki |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Kawabata |
Osaka Rosai Hospital
Department of Palliative Care
5918025
1179-3 Nagasone-cho Kita-ku Sakai city Osaka
072-252-3561
off.kawabata@gmail.com
| 1st name | Noriyuki |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Kawabata |
Osaka Rosai Hospital
Department of Palliative Care
5918025
1179-3 Nagasone-cho Kita-ku Sakai city Osaka
072-252-3561
off.kawabata@gmail.com
Osaka Rosai Hospital
None
Self funding
Osaka Rosai Hospital
1179-3 Nagasone-cho Kita-ku Sakai city Osaka
072-252-3561
somuk-osakah@m.johas.go.jp
NO
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 13 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2026 | Year | 02 | Month | 04 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2029 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
This is a two-center prospective observational cohort study. Eligible participants are hospitalized cancer patients who require a newly selected main administration route because peripheral venous access is difficult or expected to become difficult, and who start either PICC or the subcutaneous route (SC) as the main route. The exposure of interest is the selected main route (PICC or SC), and the primary outcome is treatment continuity from Day 0 through Day 14. No allocation is performed; route selection is left to treating physicians under routine clinical practice at each center. Consecutive case enrollment will be used. For analysis, propensity score-based confounding adjustment will be applied, with assessment of center effect and overlap, and methods accounting for death as a competing event.
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 12 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 11 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000070070