| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000061034 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000069846 |
| Scientific Title | A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Forearm Cannulation versus Landmark-Guided Dorsal Hand Cannulation in Pediatric Patients |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/04/01 |
| Last modified on | 2026/03/24 12:01:27 |
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Forearm Cannulation versus Landmark-Guided Dorsal Hand Cannulation in Pediatric Patients
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Forearm Cannulation versus Landmark-Guided Dorsal Hand Cannulation in Pediatric Patients
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Forearm Cannulation versus Landmark-Guided Dorsal Hand Cannulation in Pediatric Patients
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Forearm Cannulation versus Landmark-Guided Dorsal Hand Cannulation in Pediatric Patients
| Japan |
pediatric peripheral intravenous infusion
| Child |
Others
NO
Peripheral intravenous catheterization (PIVC) in pediatric patients is a fundamental and routinely performed procedure. However, catheter failure (CF) occurs at a relatively high rate of 34-38%, leading to repeated cannulation attempts and infiltration, which increase the burden on both children and their caregivers and result in inefficient use of medical resources.
Traditionally, cannulation of dorsal hand veins has been the standard approach due to their good visibility. In recent years, however, advances in ultrasound technology have enabled cannulation of forearm veins. Despite this, no studies have directly compared CF rates between dorsal hand cannulation and ultrasound-guided forearm cannulation in pediatric patients, and standardization remains insufficient.
This study aims to optimize pediatric venous access techniques based on scientific evidence and has significant clinical relevance in clarifying their effectiveness and safety.
Safety
Confirmatory
Not applicable
To compare the incidence of catheter failure (CF) between the two techniques and to determine which is superior in terms of infusion completion rates.
(1) To compare the first-attempt success rate, number of insertion attempts, and catheter dwell time between the two groups.
(2) To evaluate the association between catheter failure (CF) and anatomical factors (e.g., vessel diameter, depth, and distance from joints), as well as clinical factors (e.g., age and type of infusate).
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
YES
YES
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
YES
Central registration
2
Treatment
| Device,equipment |
In the control group (dorsal hand vein cannulation group), cannulation is performed in the dorsal hand vein using a 24-gauge Surflo Flash catheter (Terumo Corporation) according to standard practice. The insertion site is then secured with Microfoam surgical tape and Cathereeplus, followed by immobilization using an age-appropriate pediatric splint.
In the intervention group (ultrasound guided forearm vein cannulation group), forearm veins are visualized using a FUJIFILM SonoSite ultrasound system with an L25 ( linear probe, and cannulation is performed using a 22 gauge Surflo Flash catheter (Terumo Corporation). The insertion site is secured with Microfoam surgical tape and Cathereeplus, as in the control group, but no splint is used.
| 6 | months-old | <= |
| 6 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
Patients for whom written informed consent was obtained from a parent or legal guardian after adequate explanation of the study.
Pediatric patients aged 6 months to 6 years at the time of enrollment.
Patients who require inpatient treatment and are judged to need peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) infusion for at least 24 hours.
Patients admitted from departments other than pediatrics.
Patients with severe underlying conditions (e.g., cardiac disease, renal disease, or immunodeficiency).
Patients receiving intravenous fluids other than lactated Ringer solution with glucose or Soludem No. 2 solution.
Patients in whom peripheral intravenous access failed after two attempts.
Patients whose catheter was removed within 24 hours after initiation of infusion for medical reasons.
Patients deemed inappropriate for inclusion by the principal investigator or co-investigators.
200
| 1st name | katsuyuki |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | yokoi |
FUJITA HEALTH UNIVERSITY OKAZAKI MEDICAL CENTER
pediatrics
444-0827
1 Gotanda, Harisaki-cho, Okazaki
81564648800
k-yokoi@fujita-hu.ac.jp
| 1st name | katsuyuki |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | yokoi |
FUJITA HEALTH UNIVERSITY OKAZAKI MEDICAL CENTER
pediatrics
444-0827
1 gotanda, harisaki-cho, okazaki
81564648800
k-yokoi@fujita-hu.ac.jp
FUJITA HEALTH UNIVERSITY
katsuyuki yokoi
no
Other
fujita health university okazaki medical center
1 gotanda, harisaki-cho, okazaki
81564648800
k-yokoi@fujita-hu.ac.jp
NO
藤田医科大学岡崎医療センター
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 23 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 23 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2028 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 24 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 24 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000069846