| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000060602 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000069319 |
| Scientific Title | A systematic review of the efficacy of "delphinidin 3,5-diglucoside" on dry eyes effect in healthy adults. (update version) |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/02/06 |
| Last modified on | 2026/02/06 15:24:02 |
A systematic review of the efficacy of "delphinidin 3,5-diglucoside" on dry eyes effect in healthy adults. (update version)
A systematic review of the efficacy of "delphinidin 3,5-diglucoside" on dry eyes effect in healthy adults. (update version)
A systematic review of the efficacy of "delphinidin 3,5-diglucoside" on dry eyes effect in healthy adults. (update version)
A systematic review of the efficacy of "delphinidin 3,5-diglucoside" on dry eyes effect in healthy adults. (update version)
| Japan |
Healthy adults
| Adult |
Others
NO
The objective of this study is to clarify the functional effects of delphinidin 3,5-diglucoside intake on dry eyes effect in healthy adults, including reports of the latest clinical research.
Efficacy
Others
Others
Not applicable
Tear secretion (Schirmer's test)
Subjective symptoms (VAS, DEQS), Other eye-related indicators (pupillary response, tear break-up time, Flicker test)
Others,meta-analysis etc
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
P-Participant: Participant
The subjects were healthy adults (those who are not suffering from any diseases, excluding those under 18 years old, pregnant women, and lactating women)
I-intervention: Intervention (food) characteristics
Continuous intake of delphinidin 3,5-diglucoside, Unlimited dosage forms, period and follow-up period.
C-Comparison: Comparison
Placebo (The placebo's formulation is not specified)
O-Outcome: Outcome
The primary outcome: Tear secretion (Schirmer's test)
The secondary outcome: Subjective symptoms (VAS, DEQS), Other eye-related indicators (pupillary response, tear break-up time, Flicker test)
S-Study design: Study design
Randomized parallel group controlled trials, randomized crossover trials, quasi-randomized parallel group controlled trials, quasi-randomized crossover trials, non-randomized parallel group controlled trials, non-randomized crossover trials or open trial
The literature which does not meet PICOS, such as conference abstracts (conference proceedings) that are not original articles will be excluded.
| 1st name | Norihito |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Shimizu |
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
New Products Development Dept. R&D Center
493-8001
1 Aza Numata Kitagata, Kitagata-cho, Ichinomiya-city, Aichi-pref.
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.biglobe.ne.jp
| 1st name | Marina |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Hirano |
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Planning & Solution Development Department Section
493-8001
1 Aza Numata Kitagata, Kitagata-cho, Ichinomiya-city, Aichi-pref.
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.biglobe.ne.jp
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Profit organization
Not applicable
Not applicable
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.boglobe.ne.jp
NO
| 2026 | Year | 02 | Month | 06 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2026 | Year | 02 | Month | 03 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 02 | Month | 07 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
[Literature search]
Search across 8 databases, and search across Foods with Functional Claims search site (Consumer Affairs Agency), related papers as a hand search. The search will be conducted by reviewer A.
[Literature selection and data extraction]
Reviewer A and B will independently screen the literature and extract data based on the eligibility criteria.
[Bias risk assessment]
Evaluation selection bias (randomization, allocation concealment), blinding bias (participants, outcome assessors), attrition bias (ITT/FAS/PPS, incomplete outcome data), selective outcome reporting, other bias, summary and non-directness of individual studies. Assess the risk as "high", "medium/suspected", or "low".
[Certainty Assessment]
Evaluate the risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) for each outcome. These evaluations will be combined to assess the overall certainty of the evidence. The risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) will be assessed in three levels: "high", "medium/suspected", and "low". Certainty will be graded in four levels: A (strong), B (moderate), C (weak), D (very weak).
| 2026 | Year | 02 | Month | 06 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 02 | Month | 06 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000069319