| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000060409 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000069085 |
| Scientific Title | Evaluation of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared With Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure: An Error Grid Analysis |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/01/20 |
| Last modified on | 2026/01/20 13:36:47 |
Evaluation of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared With Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure: An Error Grid Analysis
Evaluation of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared With Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure: An Error Grid Analysis
Evaluation of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared With Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure: An Error Grid Analysis
Evaluation of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Compared With Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure: An Error Grid Analysis
| Japan |
Patients who underwent general anesthesia
| Anesthesiology |
Malignancy
NO
In this study, we will compare blood pressure values obtained with the noninvasive blood pressure monitor, the VitaWave finger cuff, with invasive arterial pressure measured via a radial arterial catheter in elective surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia , using error grid analysis.
Efficacy
In this study, we will compare blood pressure values obtained with the noninvasive blood pressure monitor, the VitaWave finger cuff, with invasive arterial pressure measured via a radial arterial catheter in elective surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia , using error grid analysis.
Observational
| 20 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
1. Patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia in the supine position.
2. Patients for whom intraoperative invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is required as part of standard blood pressure monitoring.
1. Emergency surgery.
2. Known preoperative arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation.
3. Patients in whom blood pressure measurement on both arms is difficult (e.g., post-breast cancer surgery, hemodialysis patients).
4. A preoperative inter-arm blood pressure difference of > 10 mmHg in mean arterial pressure.
75
| 1st name | Takashi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Juri |
Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Anesthesiology
5458586
1-5-7 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
0666452186
takataka0061@yahoo.co.jp
| 1st name | Takashi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Juri |
Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Anesthesiology
5458586
1-5-7 Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
0666452186
takataka0061@yahoo.co.jp
Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine
Self funding
Self funding
Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine Ethics committee
1-5-7,Asahimachi, Abenoku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan
0666456125
ethics@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp
NO
| 2026 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2025 | Year | 12 | Month | 05 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 01 | Month | 15 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 01 | Month | 18 | Day |
| 2028 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
In this study, we will compare blood pressure measurements obtained with the noninvasive blood pressure monitor VitaWave Finger Cuff with invasive arterial pressure measured via a radial arterial catheter in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia in whom invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is required, using error grid analysis.
| 2026 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000069085