UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000060041
Receipt number R000068663
Scientific Title Photoprotective effects of oral lycopene intake against ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review
Date of disclosure of the study information 2025/12/11
Last modified on 2025/12/11 14:22:31

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Photoprotective effects of oral lycopene intake against ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review

Acronym

Photoprotective effects of oral lycopene intake against ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review

Scientific Title

Photoprotective effects of oral lycopene intake against ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review

Scientific Title:Acronym

Photoprotective effects of oral lycopene intake against ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Healthy adults

Classification by specialty

Adult

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To examine whether, in healthy adults, oral intake of a test substance containing lycopene provides photoprotective effects against ultraviolet (UV) exposure compared with oral intake of a non-lycopene product, a product containing an extremely low concentration of lycopene, or no intervention.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Others

Trial characteristics_2

Others

Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

Erythema (a* value) at the UV-irradiated site

Key secondary outcomes

Minimal Erythema Dose (MED), L* value at the UV-irradiated site, Erythema Index at the UV-irradiated site, and D30


Base

Study type

Others,meta-analysis etc


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

18 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

(PICOS)
Participant:
Healthy adults without illness (excluding minor under 18 years old, pregnant women, those planning to become pregnant, and lactating women)

Intervention:
Oral intake of test foods containing lycopene, regardless of the form, dosage, or duration of intake.

Comparison:
Oral intake of test foods that does not contain lycopene, or has an extremely low concentration of lycopene compared to the intervention, or no intervention at all.

Outcome measurement:
The erythema (a* value) at the UV-irradiated site is the primary outcome. The Minimal Erythema Dose (MED), the L* value at the UV-irradiated site, the Erythema Index at the UV-irradiated site, and D30 are the secondary outcomes. The measurements at the final evaluation time point will be used as outcomes.

Study design:
Randomized parallel group-controlled trial (RCT-P), randomized crossover-controlled trial (RCT-C), quasi-randomized parallel group-controlled trial (qRCT-P), quasi-randomized crossover-controlled trial (qRCT-C), non-randomized parallel group-controlled trial (nonRCT-P), non-randomized crossover-controlled trial (nonRCT-C), and non-randomized controlled trial are the study designs of clinical trials.

(Language)
Eligibility is not restricted by language.

Key exclusion criteria

Studies that do not aim to evaluate photoprotective effects against UV exposure will be excluded. Studies that assess the safety of excessive lycopene intake by administering large amounts of lycopene over a short period will also be excluded. Conference proceedings (such as meeting abstracts) and unpublished materials, for which detailed verification is not feasible, will be excluded. In addition, other forms of grey literature will be excluded because their appropriateness cannot be adequately ascertained.

Target sample size



Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Shingo
Middle name
Last name Takahashi

Organization

KAGOME CO., LTD.

Division name

Diet and Well-being Research Institute

Zip code

329-2762

Address

17 Nishitomiyama, Nasushiobara-shi, Tochigi

TEL

0287-36-2935

Email

g167_0@kagome.co.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Yuichiro
Middle name
Last name Nakazawa

Organization

KAGOME CO., LTD.

Division name

Diet and Well-being Research Institute

Zip code

329-2762

Address

17 Nishitomiyama, Nasushiobara-shi, Tochigi

TEL

0287-36-2935

Homepage URL


Email

g167_0@kagome.co.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

KAGOME CO., LTD.

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

None

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Kagome CO.,LTD. Research Ethics Review Committee

Address

3-21-1 Nihonbashihamacho. chuo-ku, Tokyo

Tel

03-5623-8501

Email

IRB@kagome.co.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2025 Year 12 Month 11 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

https://zenodo.org/records/17892624

Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Preinitiation

Date of protocol fixation

2025 Year 12 Month 05 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2026 Year 02 Month 02 Day

Last follow-up date

2026 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

(Search strategy)
Seven databases and research registries will be searched by a searcher. FFC database will be searched and omitted related studies will be added to the review. The studies found by other methods will be added.


(Selection and data collection)
It will be conducted based on eligibility criteria independently by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion between the reviewers.


(Risk of bias)
It will be assessed independently by two reviewers using modified check list (13 items) of Cochrane Handbook for interventional trials. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion between the reviewers. The agreement rate and the kappa coefficient will be calculated. Studies with a high risk of bias will not be adopted.

(Indirectness)
It will be evaluated independently by two reviewers.

(Data synthesis)
A meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan Web only in the absence of heterogeneity. Studies with missing data will be excluded if no data is available by contacting the author. If not suitable for synthesis, a qualitative assessment will be carried out. Sensitivity analysis and sub-group analysis will be performed as needed based on the results of selected articles.

(Imprecision)
It will be assessed based on the total number of participants.

(Inconsistency)
It will be evaluated by the I square value and statistical test in a meta-analysis. When a meta-analysis cannot be conducted, each study outcome will be classified as showing a significant effect (P) or no significant effect (N), and inconsistency will be evaluated in three levels based on the concordance rate of these classifications.

(Publication bias)
It will be assessed from Funnel plot and the reporting status of studies registered in research registries. When a meta-analysis cannot be conducted, publication bias will be assessed based solely on the reporting status of studies registered in research registries.

(Review team)
YN, MK, ST (KAGOME CO., LTD.)
SS, HK (Others)


Management information

Registered date

2025 Year 12 Month 10 Day

Last modified on

2025 Year 12 Month 11 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000068663