| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000061099 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000068201 |
| Scientific Title | Comparison of Sedation Outcomes and Discharge Criteria Between Remimazolam and Flunitrazepam in Outpatient Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2026/03/30 |
| Last modified on | 2026/03/29 18:36:24 |
Comparison of Sedation Outcomes and Discharge Criteria Between Remimazolam and Flunitrazepam in Outpatient Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study
Remimazolam vs flunitrazepam for sedation in outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy: time to discharge based on standardized discharge criteria (prospective observational study)
Comparison of Sedation Outcomes and Discharge Criteria Between Remimazolam and Flunitrazepam in Outpatient Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study
Remimazolam vs flunitrazepam for sedation in outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy: time to discharge based on standardized discharge criteria (prospective observational study)
| Japan |
Gastrointestinal diseases requiring upper or lower endoscopy (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux disease, atrophic gastritis, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, colorectal polyps)
| Gastroenterology |
Others
NO
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the novel sedative remimazolam for outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy, with a focus on recovery time and discharge readiness.
Safety,Efficacy
Time (minutes) from end of endoscopy to discharge readiness (first attainment of PADSS>9/10)
Compare sedation drug use and the frequency of sedation-related adverse events (SBP <90 mmHg,SpO2 <90%, HR <50 bpm, oxygen supplementation), including whether interventions were required.
Observational
| 18 | years-old | < |
| 100 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
Consecutive participants aged >= 18 years undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD) or colonoscopy (CS) under sedation at our clinic who provide written informed consent to this study.
Known allergy or hypersensitivity to the study drugs
Poor general condition classified as ASA Physical Status Class IV or V
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Severe COPD or obstructive sleep apnea; severe hepatic impairment (e.g., Child-Pugh C); chronic benzodiazepine use or tolerance; severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m^2)
Unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent to this study
140
| 1st name | Atsushi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Imagawa |
Imagawa Medical Clinic
Gastroenterology
769-1503
285-3, Takeda, Kasada, Toyonaka, Mitoyo-city, Kagawa, Japan
+81-875-62-2052
imagawa-gi@nifty.com
| 1st name | Atsushi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Imagawa |
Imagawa Medical Clinic
Gastroenterology
769-1503
285-3, Takeda, Kasada, Toyonaka, Mitoyo-city, Kagawa, Japan
+81-875-62-2052
imagawa-gi@nifty.com
Imagawa Medical Clinic
Atsushi Imagawa
Imagawa Medical Clinic
Self funding
Kagawa Medical Association
73-4 Hamano-cho, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan
+81-87-823-0155
kma@kagawa.med.or.jp
NO
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 30 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 17 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 14 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 19 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 19 | Day |
Patients were divided into a flunitrazepam group (F group first 70 consecutive cases) and a remimazolam group (R group subsequent 70 consecutive cases). Conscious sedation was performed, defined as a state in which the patient responds to stimuli while maintaining spontaneous respiration and airway patency. The depth of sedation was assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (levels 1-6), with level 4 (asleep but with a brisk response to a light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus) as the target level. In elderly patients and those with low body weight, the initial dose was reduced to half of the standard dose. When patients had a previous history of sedation at our institution, the previously effective dose was used as a reference. Additional doses were administered as needed according to the depth of sedation and sedative effect, mainly judged by the presence of body movement.
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 29 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 29 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000068201