| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000059579 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000068145 |
| Scientific Title | Exploratory study on the effectiveness of a gaze training system for difficulties with eye contact as a welfare service (support for independence): A pilot single-arm trial |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/10/29 |
| Last modified on | 2025/10/29 14:01:39 |
A Study on the Effectiveness of a Gaze Training System for Difficulties in Eye Contact
Gaze training to improve eye contact
Exploratory study on the effectiveness of a gaze training system for difficulties with eye contact as a welfare service (support for independence): A pilot single-arm trial
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Gaze Training System for Improving Eye Contact (Pilot Single-Arm Trial)
| Japan |
Social anxiety disorder
| Psychosomatic Internal Medicine | Psychiatry | Adult |
| Child |
Others
NO
This study aims to examine the feasibility (safety and effectiveness) of improving difficulties in making eye contact through gaze training using ECOM Light with a general-purpose camera for individuals who face challenges in communication and relationship building, by conducting a single-arm trial. If it is found that gaze training within social skills training conducted in welfare (non-medical) settings can safely improve difficulties in making eye contact, it may lead to enhanced support for independence and is considered to have significant social value.
Efficacy
Exploratory
The examination items for each period are listed below. Pre-evaluation: Week 0Primary evaluation items:- Assessment of the severity of eye contact in daily life (Clinical Global Impression-Severity [CGI-S]): Rated on an 8-point scale where 0 = not assessed, 1 = normal, 2 = borderline, 3 = mild, 4 = moderate, 5 = marked, 6 = severe, and 7 = very severe.- Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) through a structured interview conducted by the evaluator.Post-evaluation (immediately after intervention): Week 4Primary evaluation items:- Assessment of overall improvement in eye contact in daily life (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement [CGI-I]): Rated on an 8-point scale where 0 = unable to determine, 1 = very much improved, to 7 = very much worsened.- Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) through a structured interview conducted by the evaluator.Follow-up evaluation (4 weeks after intervention): Week 8Primary evaluation items:- Assessment of improvement in eye contact in daily life by both the study evaluator and supporters (including cohabiting family members) (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement [CGI-I]): Rated on an 8-point scale where 0 = unable to determine, 1 = very much improved, to 7 = very much worsened.
As secondary evaluation items, self-reported assessments were used, including the SPIN (Social Phobia Inventory) for social anxiety, the PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) for depression, the GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) for generalized anxiety, and the EQ-5D (EuroQol 5 Dimension) for quality of life evaluation.
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Uncontrolled
1
Treatment
| Behavior,custom |
Researchers from Chiba University will visit facilities such as the NPO Cosmos Social Welfare Association (Yachimata City) and Kashiwa Regional Youth Support Station (Kashiwa City), where the trial participants will undergo gaze training using ECOM Lite for more than 5 minutes per session, at least 4 times.
| 16 | years-old | <= |
| 65 | years-old | > |
Male and Female
1) Individuals who have difficulties with communication and building interpersonal relationships and regularly use welfare facilities, etc. 2) Individuals who are between 16 and 65 years of age at the time of consent 3) Individuals who have received an explanation of the study, understood it, and given written consent 4) Individuals who have difficulty making eye contact 5) Individuals who do not plan to start any new medical treatment during the study period 6) Individuals who can watch a monitor for about 5 to 10 minutes, and are able to continue with 10-minute sessions for 4 weeks of intervention and a subsequent 4-week observation period (follow-up)
1) Individuals with physical disabilities (including visual and hearing impairments) 2) Others deemed ineligible by the researcher
10
| 1st name | Eiji |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Shimizu |
Chiba University Center for Child Mental Development and Education Research(Graduate School of Medicine, Laboratory of Cognitive Behavioral Physiology)
Institute of Medical Research
260-8670
1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo Ward, Chiba City, Chiba Prefecture
043-226-2027
neurophys1@ML.chiba-u.jp
| 1st name | Kenshiro |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Taguchi |
Osaka University United Graduate School of Child Development
Institute of Medical Research
260-8670
1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo Ward, Chiba City, Chiba Prefecture
080-2700-7774
u870828c@ecs.osaka-u.ac.jp
Chiba University
Operating subsidy
Self funding
Chiba University
1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, 260-8670, Japan
043-226-2027
neurophys1@ML.chiba-u.jp
NO
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 29 | Day |
Unpublished
Enrolling by invitation
| 2025 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 03 | Month | 06 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 11 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 29 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 29 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000068145