UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000059366
Receipt number R000067898
Scientific Title Comparison of the effects of polysulfone and cellulose triacetate membranes on circuit lifespan in continuous renal replacement therapy: A non-randomized controlled trial
Date of disclosure of the study information 2025/10/11
Last modified on 2025/10/10 12:43:32

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Comparison of circuit lifespan between polysulfone and cellulose triacetate membranes during continuous renal replacement therapy

Acronym

Comparative study of hemodialysis membranes

Scientific Title

Comparison of the effects of polysulfone and cellulose triacetate membranes on circuit lifespan in continuous renal replacement therapy: A non-randomized controlled trial

Scientific Title:Acronym

A non-randomized comparative study on circuit lifespan between polysulfone and cellulose triacetate membranes

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

cute kidney injury (AKI) or chronic kidney disease (CKD), including end-stage renal disease (ESRD), requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)

Classification by specialty

Intensive care medicine

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

In Japan, five types of hemofilter membrane materials are currently available for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Each membrane material has unique characteristics, and clinicians may select them according to the patient's disease and clinical condition. One of the key considerations in membrane selection is the potential to extend circuit lifespan. CRRT is performed continuously over 24 hours; however, the replacement interval of the circuit, including the hemofilter, varies among institutions, typically every 24 or 48 hours. When circuits are used beyond 24 hours, membranes with higher antithrombogenic properties are preferred. Cellulose triacetate (CTA) membranes are known for their antithrombogenic properties, but evidence supporting their contribution to prolonged circuit lifespan remains limited. Therefore, we conducted a non-randomized comparative study at our institution to evaluate the effect of membrane material on circuit lifespan. Polysulfone (PS) membranes, which are the most commonly used in CRRT in Japan, were selected as the comparator.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

The primary endpoint of this study was the cumulative circuit survival rate at 48 hours, analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Parallel

Randomization

Non-randomized

Randomization unit


Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Active

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

2

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Device,equipment

Interventions/Control_1

For patients requiring CRRT, hemofilters with cellulose triacetate (CTA) membranes were used for the first and second day of treatment.

Interventions/Control_2

For patients requiring CRRT, hemofilters with polysulfone (PS) membranes were used for the first and second day of treatment.

Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

18 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

The study population consisted of patients admitted to the intensive care unit of our hospital between June 2023 and September 2024, for whom the attending intensivist or primary physician determined that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was required.

Key exclusion criteria

Patients meeting any of the following criteria were excluded from the study:

Presence of significant coagulation abnormalities due to hematologic disorders.

Use of a hemofilter other than the assigned membrane material during the first or second CRRT session.

Circuit clotting caused by prolonged troubleshooting, such as device malfunction or inadequate blood flow.

Missing data regarding patient background or CRRT treatment conditions.

Target sample size

48


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Taro
Middle name
Last name Shimomura

Organization

Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital

Division name

Department of Clinical Engineering

Zip code

5438555

Address

5-30 Fudegasaki-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka , Japan

TEL

0667745111

Email

taroumail1978@yahoo.co.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name taro
Middle name
Last name shimomura

Organization

Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital

Division name

Department of Clinical Engineering

Zip code

5438555

Address

5-30 Fudegasaki-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka , Japan

TEL

0667745111

Homepage URL


Email

taroumail1978@yahoo.co.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital

Institute

Department

Personal name

Taro Shimomura


Funding Source

Organization

None

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital

Address

5-30 Fudegasaki-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka , Japan

Tel

0667745111

Email

hospital@osaka-med.jrc.or.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2025 Year 10 Month 11 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

https://www.osaka-med.jrc.or.jp/assets/pdf/ethics/ethics-j_03.pdf

Publication of results

Published


Result

URL related to results and publications

https://www.credoinc.jp/jsbpcc36/PDF/program_jsbpcc36.pdf

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

69

Results

There were no significant differences in underlying diseases between the two groups. Baseline characteristics, including sex, severity, and coagulation-related laboratory data, showed no significant differences between the groups.The primary endpoint, cumulative circuit survival rate at 48 hours, was 52.4% in the PS group and 52.9% in the CTA group, with no significant difference (P = 0.72).

Results date posted

2025 Year 10 Month 10 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics

Disease background
CTA group: Sepsis 25.0%, Respiratory failure 20.8%, Post-cardiac surgery 12.5%
PS group: Sepsis 20.8%, Respiratory failure 25.0%, Post-cardiac surgery 12.5%

Baseline characteristics
CTA group: Age 69.0 [65.0-76.3] years; Male 13 (79.2%); Body weight 64.5 [55.5-81.1] kg; APACHE II 27.5 [22.0-36.0]; SOFA 12.5 [9.0-14.0]; Hematocrit 29.5 [25.7-32.5] %; DIC score 3.0 [1.8-4.3]; ICU length of stay 15.5 [8.3-30.8] days; 28-day mortality 6 (25.0%)
PS group: Age 70.0 [62.5-78.0] years; Male 13 (54.2%); Body weight 62.8 [57.5-76.7] kg; APACHE II 32.5 [25.8-36.5]; SOFA 11.0 [8.8-13.3]; Hematocrit 29.1 [24.8-36.0] %; DIC score 3.0 [2.0-4.0]; ICU length of stay 12.5 [10.0-16.3] days; 28-day mortality 3 (12.5%)

Participant flow

Of the 91 eligible patients during the study period, 69 were enrolled. The PS allocation period started on June 1, 2023. Of the 32 patients assigned to the PS group, 8 were excluded, leaving 24 patients for the final analysis. The CTA allocation period started on December 1, 2023. Of the 37 patients assigned to the CTA group, 13 were excluded, leaving 24 patients for the final analysis.

Adverse events

No adverse events were observed during the study.

Outcome measures

During the study period, 91 patients met the eligibility criteria, of whom 22 patients who did not undergo circuit replacement were excluded, leaving 69 patients for registration. During the PS group data collection period, 8 patients were excluded, 7 due to the use of non-assigned hemofilters, and 1 due to missing data on CRRT treatment conditions. During the CTA group data collection period, 13 patients were excluded, all due to the use of non-assigned hemofilters.

There were no significant differences in underlying diseases between the two groups. Both groups had high proportions of respiratory failure and sepsis, which together accounted for approximately half of the patients. Baseline characteristics, including sex, severity, and coagulation-related laboratory data, showed no significant differences between the groups.

The primary endpoint, cumulative circuit survival rate at 48 hours, was 52.4% in the PS group and 52.9% in the CTA group, with no significant difference (P = 0.72). Regarding the secondary endpoint of clotting sites, the PS group predominantly experienced clotting in the venous chamber, whereas the CTA group predominantly experienced clotting in the hemofilter (P < 0.01).

Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2023 Year 03 Month 13 Day

Date of IRB

2023 Year 05 Month 25 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2023 Year 06 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2024 Year 09 Month 30 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2025 Year 10 Month 10 Day

Last modified on

2025 Year 10 Month 10 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000067898