 UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial
 UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000059224 | 
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000067466 | 
| Scientific Title | Systematic Review on the Effects of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Supplementation on Sleep Quality | 
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/09/30 | 
| Last modified on | 2025/09/22 09:28:51 | 
Systematic Review on the Effects of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Supplementation on Sleep Quality
Systematic Review on the Effects of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Supplementation on Sleep Quality
Systematic Review on the Effects of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Supplementation on Sleep Quality
Systematic Review on the Effects of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Supplementation on Sleep Quality
| Japan | 
Healthy Adults
| Adult | 
Others
NO
The aim of this study was to examine whether the intake of GABA improves sleep quality in healthy adult men and women, compared to placebo intake, by administering GABA.
Efficacy
Electroencephalography,VAS,Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index,OSA-MA
Others,meta-analysis etc
| 18 | years-old | <= | 
| Not applicable | 
Male and Female
Participants (P)
Healthy adult men and women were included. Individuals with diagnosed diseases, minors, pregnant or lactating women were excluded. Those with temporary sleep-related concerns were considered healthy if they met no exclusion criteria, but were categorized separately from those without such concerns. Sleep concerns were defined as temporary and distinct from clinical sleep disorders.
Intervention (I)
The intervention was oral intake of GABA-containing food products. Previous studies have employed intake durations ranging from one to twelve weeks. However, considering that prolonged supplementation may extend beyond the scope of transient sleep-related complaints and potentially influence broader physiological parameters, studies exceeding four weeks were, as a general protocol, designed with stratified cohorts to account for duration-dependent effects. All previous studies used 100 mg of GABA, which was adopted as the assumed effective dose. Studies with higher or lower doses were considered for subgroup analysis. Studies without clear dosage information were excluded.
Comparison (C)
The comparison was oral intake of food products without GABA. Studies containing ingredients known to affect sleep were excluded unless the amount was negligible or deemed not to influence outcomes. All qualifying studies were grouped together without further subdivision.
Outcome (O)
The primary outcome was improvement in sleep quality. EEG measurement was considered essential, following recommendations by the Japanese Society of Sleep Research. Additionally, subjective assessments of sleep restfulness were included, based on the Ministry of Health's "Sleep Guidelines for Health Promotion 2023." Subjective measures included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Oguri-Shirakawa-Azumi Sleep Inventory for Middle-Aged and Aged (OSA-MA).
Exclude trials that do not meet the selection criteria, such as those including individuals with diseases.
| 1st name | Hisashi | 
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Takeuchi | 
Association of Japan CAM
N/A
1510053
#306 Onogibiru,3-46-16 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo
0364574911
info@ajcam.biz
| 1st name | Takeshi | 
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Kaneko | 
Japan Clinical Trial Association
N/A
1600022
5F, 4-3-17 Shinjuku, Shinjukuku, Tokyo
0364574666
info@yakujihou.org
Japan Clinical Trial Association
Matsumoto Trading Co.,Ltd.
Profit organization
Japan Clinical Trial Association
5F, 4-3-17 Shinjuku, Shinjukuku, Tokyo
0364574666
info@yakujihou.org
NO
| 2025 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day | 
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2025 | Year | 09 | Month | 29 | Day | 
| 2025 | Year | 09 | Month | 29 | Day | 
| 2026 | Year | 09 | Month | 28 | Day | 
Search Strategy
Database searches were conducted using PubMed, JDream III, UMIN, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Reviewers A and B discussed and formulated search queries based on the research question and PICOS framework. Where available, thesaurus terms provided by each database were prioritized and combined with free-text keywords. Detailed search strategies are described in Appendix Form (V)-5. Additionally, the Consumer Affairs Agency's notification database was used to identify studies adopted in research reviews where GABA was registered as a functional ingredient.
Risk of Bias Assessment
Risk of bias was assessed in the following domains: (1) selection bias (randomization, allocation concealment), (2) performance and detection bias (blinding of participants and outcome assessors), (3) attrition bias (analysis methods, incomplete outcome data), (4) selective outcome reporting, (5) other biases, (6) overall assessment, and (7) indirectness of individual studies. Each domain was rated as "high", "unclear", or "low" risk.
Certainty of Evidence
Certainty of evidence was evaluated for each outcome based on risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (e.g., publication bias). Each domain was rated as "high", "unclear", or "low". Overall certainty was graded into four levels: high (A), moderate (B), low (C), and very low (D).
| 2025 | Year | 09 | Month | 29 | Day | 
| 2025 | Year | 09 | Month | 22 | Day | 
Value 
 https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000067466