UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000058828
Receipt number R000067268
Scientific Title Differential Peripheral Circulatory Responses to Neuroprosthetic Functional Electrical Stimulation (NP-FES) in Elderly Stroke Patients With Severe and Mild Hemiplegia
Date of disclosure of the study information 2025/08/21
Last modified on 2025/08/20 10:50:53

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Effect of NP-FES (Electrical Stimulation) on Hand Blood Flow in Elderly Stroke Patients
Differences Between Severe and Mild Paralysis

Acronym

NP-FES Blood Flow Study

Scientific Title

Differential Peripheral Circulatory Responses to Neuroprosthetic Functional Electrical Stimulation (NP-FES) in Elderly Stroke Patients With Severe and Mild Hemiplegia

Scientific Title:Acronym

NP-FES Circulation Trial (NP-FES-CirT)

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Chronic post-stroke hemiplegia

Classification by specialty

Neurology Rehabilitation medicine

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The objective of this study is to clarify the effects of Neuroprosthetic Functional Electrical Stimulation (NP-FES) on peripheral circulation in patients with chronic stroke. In particular, the study aims to compare blood flow responses between the severe paralysis group (Brunnstrom Recovery Stage 2 or below) and the mild paralysis group (Brunnstrom Recovery Stage 5 or above), and to identify the onset timing and differences in responsiveness of circulatory improvement.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Exploratory

Trial characteristics_2

Explanatory

Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

Estimated blood flow (Q), calculated using a model combining volume waveform, skin temperature, and hemoglobin concentration.

Measurement timing: before stimulation, immediately after stimulation, and 3 minutes post-stimulation

Evaluation points: baseline (0 week), week 2, and week 4

Key secondary outcomes

Patient-reported outcomes obtained through questionnaire/semi-structured interview: subjective experience (usability, cold sensation, pain), changes in self-efficacy, and initiation of daily use


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Single arm

Randomization

Non-randomized

Randomization unit


Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Self control

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

1

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Device,equipment

Interventions/Control_1

Electrical stimulation (70 Hz, 120 ms) is applied to the paretic extensor muscles, triggered by electromyographic signals from the non-paretic side, to induce joint movement.

Stimulation is delivered for 4 minutes per session.

Frequency: twice a week for 4 weeks (8 sessions in total).

Measurement timing: before stimulation, immediately after stimulation, and 3 minutes post-stimulation.

Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

Patients with chronic stroke, at least 1 year after onset

Hemiplegia with Brunnstrom Recovery Stage of 2 or below, or 5 or above

Age 20 years or older

Written informed consent obtained from the participant

Key exclusion criteria

Patients with cognitive impairment that makes it difficult to understand the study or provide informed consent

Patients with severe cardiac, respiratory, or orthopedic conditions that preclude safe intervention

Patients with skin disease, infection, or injury at the electrode placement site

Patients with implanted electronic devices such as pacemakers

Target sample size

20


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Masaya
Middle name
Last name Tanabe

Organization

Faculty of Rehabilitation, Gunma Paz University

Division name

Department of Physical Therapy

Zip code

370-0006

Address

1-7-1 Tonyamachi, Takasaki, Gunma 370-0006, Japan

TEL

027-365-336

Email

tanabe@paz.ac.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Masaya
Middle name
Last name Tanabe

Organization

Faculty of Rehabilitation, Gunma Paz University

Division name

Department of Physical Therapy

Zip code

3703105

Address

1-7-1 Tonyamachi, Takasaki, Gunma 370-0006, Japan

TEL

027-365-3366

Homepage URL


Email

tanabe@paz.ac.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Gunma Paz University

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Gunma Paz University

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Faculty of Rehabilitation, Gunma Paz University

Address

1-7-1 Tonyamachi, Takasaki, Gunma 370-0006, Japan

Tel

027-365-3366

Email

tanabe@paz.ac.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW

群馬県


Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2025 Year 08 Month 21 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

16

Results

NP-FES improved peripheral circulation in chronic stroke patients. The effect appeared earlier and stronger in severe hemiplegia (Brunnstrom stage 2 or below) than in mild (stage 5 or above). Questionnaires also showed perceived improvement in circulation and warmth in the severe group. Sensory stimulation below motor threshold had no clear benefit. NP-FES may be particularly effective for patients with severe hemiplegia.

Results date posted

2025 Year 08 Month 18 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics

Analyzed participants: 16 (8 severe, 8 mild)
Age: mean 76.8 (SD 6.8) years, severe 72.5 (SD 6.5), mild 81.1 (SD 4.0)
Sex: 50 percent male
Duration since stroke onset: mean 9.4 (SD 3.7) years, all at least 1 year
Height: mean 158.3 (SD 9.0) cm
Weight: mean 57.4 (SD 10.7) kg
BMI: mean 22.9 (SD 3.7)
Affected side: Right 7, Left 9
Fugl Meyer Assessment Upper Limb (FMA UL): mean 34.4 (SD 19.7)
Trunk Impairment Scale (TI

Participant flow

A total of 195 individuals were screened across four participating facilities.
Of these, 22 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study.
During the intervention period, four participants withdrew for health related reasons: worsening heart failure (n=1), COVID-19 infection (n=1), scheduled surgery (n=1), and conflicting medical appointments (n=1).
Two participants with moderate paralysis (Brunnstrom Recovery Stage 3-4) were excluded.
Finally, 16 participants completed all intervention phases and were included in the analysis: 8 with severe paralysis (Brunnstrom Stage 2 or below) and 8 with mild paralysis (Stage 5 or above).

Adverse events

No adverse events related to NP-FES or sensory stimulation were observed.

Four participants withdrew due to health or scheduling reasons (worsening heart failure [n=1], COVID-19 infection [n=1], scheduled surgery [n=1], conflicting medical appointments [n=1]); none were considered related to the intervention.

Outcome measures

Changes in peripheral circulation indices measured by ASTRIM FIT (Sysmex, Japan)

Parameters: venous vessel width (VVW), skin surface temperature, estimated hemoglobin (Hb) levels

Estimated blood flow (Q) calculated from these parameters using a regression model

Measurement points: before, immediately after, and 3 minutes post-stimulation (assessed at baseline, week 2, and week 4)

Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

No longer recruiting

Date of protocol fixation

2022 Year 11 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB

2021 Year 07 Month 28 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2023 Year 01 Month 05 Day

Last follow-up date

2024 Year 11 Month 10 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2025 Year 08 Month 18 Day

Last modified on

2025 Year 08 Month 20 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000067268