Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000058670 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000067090 |
Scientific Title | A systematic review of the functionality of "Lutein and zeaxanthin" for improving sight function in healthy adults (updated version from 2023). |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/08/01 |
Last modified on | 2025/08/01 16:59:58 |
A systematic review of the functionality of "Lutein and zeaxanthin" for improving sight function in healthy adults (updated version from 2023).
A systematic review of the functionality of "Lutein and zeaxanthin" for improving sight function in healthy adults (updated version from 2023).
A systematic review of the functionality of "Lutein and zeaxanthin" for improving sight function in healthy adults (updated version from 2023).
A systematic review of the functionality of "Lutein and zeaxanthin" for improving sight function in healthy adults (updated version from 2023).
Japan |
The subjects were healthy adults (excluding those under 18 years old, pregnant women, and lactating women)
Adult |
Others
NO
The objective of this study is to investigate whether the intake of lutein and zeaxanthin effect sight function in healthy adults, including the latest RCTs.
Efficacy
Others
Others
Not applicable
MPOD (Macular Pigment Optical Density)
Photostress recovery, Glare sensitivity, Chromatic contrast sensitivity
Others,meta-analysis etc
18 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
P-Participant: Participant
The subjects were healthy adults (excluding those under 18 years old, pregnant women, and lactating women)
I-intervention: Intervention (food) characteristics
Continuous intake of lutein and zeaxanthin, Unlimited dosage forms, period and follow-up period. Studies involving interventions with a 5:1 ratio of "lutein, zeaxanthin" will be included to ensure equivalence with our lutein and zeaxanthin containing raw materials.
C-Comparison: Comparison
Placebo (The placebo's formulation is not specified)
O-Outcome: Outcome
The primary outcome: MPOD (Macular Pigment Optical Density)
The secondary outcome: Photostress recovery, Glare sensitivity, Chromatic contrast sensitivity
S-Study design: Study design
Randomized parallel group controlled trials or randomized crossover trials
The literature which does not meet PICOS, such as conference abstracts (conference proceedings) that are not original articles will be excluded.
1st name | Norihito |
Middle name | |
Last name | Shimizu |
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
New Products Development Dept. R&D Center
493-8001
1 Aza Numata Kitagata, Kitagata-cho, Ichinomiya-city, Aichi-pref.
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.biglobe.ne.jp
1st name | Makiko |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hashimoto |
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Planning & Solution Development Department Section
493-8001
1 Aza Numata Kitagata, Kitagata-cho, Ichinomiya-city, Aichi-pref.
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.biglobe.ne.jp
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Profit organization
Not applicable
Not applicable
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.biglobe.ne.jp
NO
2025 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
2025 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
2025 | Year | 08 | Month | 31 | Day |
[Literature search]
Search across 8 databases, and search across Foods with Functional Claims search site (Consumer Affairs Agency) and Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience as a hand search. The search will be conducted by reviewer A.
[Literature selection and data extraction]
Reviewer A and B will independently screen the literature and extract data based on the eligibility criteria.
[Bias risk assessment]
Evaluation selection bias (randomization, allocation concealment), blinding bias (participants, outcome assessors), attrition bias (ITT/FAS/PPS, incomplete outcome data), selective outcome reporting, other bias, summary and non-directness of individual studies. Assess the risk as "high", "medium/suspected", or "low".
[Certainty Assessment]
Evaluate the risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) for each outcome. These evaluations will be combined to assess the overall certainty of the evidence. The risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) will be assessed in three levels: "high", "medium/suspected", and "low". Certainty will be graded in four levels: A (strong), B (moderate), C (weak), D (very weak).
2025 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
2025 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000067090