Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000058594 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000066992 |
Scientific Title | A systematic review of the functionality of "GABA" for lowering blood pressure, update version. |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/07/25 |
Last modified on | 2025/07/25 11:02:23 |
A systematic review of the functionality of "GABA" for lowering blood pressure, update version.
A systematic review of the functionality of "GABA" for lowering blood pressure, update version.
A systematic review of the functionality of "GABA" for lowering blood pressure, update version.
A systematic review of the functionality of "GABA" for lowering blood pressure, update version.
Japan |
The subjects are people with normal blood pressure and people with higher blood pressure (including people with high-normal blood pressure and stage 1 hypertension).
*Those who are not excluding those under 18 years old, pregnant women, and lactating women.
Adult |
Others
NO
The objective of this study is to investigate include the latest clinical research reports whether the intake of GABA improves systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in people with normal blood pressure and people with higher blood pressure (including people with high-normal blood pressure and stage 1 hypertension).
Efficacy
Others
Others
Not applicable
Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure
Others,meta-analysis etc
18 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
P-Participant: Participant
The subjects are people with normal blood pressure and people with higher blood pressure (including people with high-normal blood pressure and stage 1 hypertension).
*Those who are not excluding those under 18 years old, pregnant women, and lactating women.
I-intervention: Intervention (food) characteristics
Continuous intake of GABA, Unlimited dosage forms, period and follow-up period.
C-Comparison: Comparison
Placebo (The placebo's formulation is not specified)
O-Outcome: Outcome
The primary outcome: systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure
S-Study design: Study design
Randomized parallel group controlled trials, randomized crossover trials, quasi-randomized parallel group controlled trials, quasi-randomized crossover trials, non-randomized parallel group controlled trials, non-randomized crossover trials, open trials.
The literature which does not meet PICOS, such as conference abstracts (conference proceedings) that are not original articles will be excluded.
1st name | Norihito |
Middle name | |
Last name | Shimizu |
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
New Products Development Dept. R&D Center
493-8001
1 Aza Numata Kitagata, Kitagata-cho, Ichinomiya-city, Aichi-pref.
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.biglobe.ne.jp
1st name | Marina |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hirano |
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Planning & Solution Development Department Section
493-8001
1 Aza Numata Kitagata, Kitagata-cho, Ichinomiya-city, Aichi-pref.
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.biglobe.ne.jp
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Oryza Oil and Fat Chemical Co., Ltd.
Profit organization
Not applicable
Not applicable
0586-86-5141
kaihatsu@mri.boglobe.ne.jp
NO
2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 25 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 25 | Day |
2025 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
[Literature search]
Search across 8 databases, and search across Foods with Functional Claims search site (Consumer Affairs Agency), Japanese Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Functional food in health and disease as a hand search. The search will be conducted by reviewer A.
[Literature selection and data extraction]
Reviewer A and B will independently screen the literature and extract data based on the eligibility criteria.
[Bias risk assessment]
Evaluation selection bias (randomization, allocation concealment), blinding bias (participants, outcome assessors), attrition bias (ITT/FAS/PPS, incomplete outcome data), selective outcome reporting, other bias, summary and non-directness of individual studies. Assess the risk as "high", "medium/suspected", or "low".
[Certainty Assessment]
Evaluate the risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) for each outcome. These evaluations will be combined to assess the overall certainty of the evidence. The risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) will be assessed in three levels: "high", "medium/suspected", and "low". Certainty will be graded in four levels: A (strong), B (moderate), C (weak), D (very weak).
2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 25 | Day |
2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 25 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000066992