Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000058499 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000066882 |
Scientific Title | Comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment and balloon-enteroscopy assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography approach for the treatment of large bile duct stone removal in surgically altered anatomy. |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/07/17 |
Last modified on | 2025/07/17 12:40:56 |
Comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment and balloon-enteroscopy assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography approach for the treatment of large bile duct stone removal in surgically altered anatomy.
Comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment and balloon-enteroscopy assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography approach for the treatment of large bile duct stone removal in surgically altered anatomy.
Comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment and balloon-enteroscopy assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography approach for the treatment of large bile duct stone removal in surgically altered anatomy.
Comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment and balloon-enteroscopy assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography approach for the treatment of large bile duct stone removal in surgically altered anatomy.
Japan |
large bile duct stone in patients with surgical altered anatomy
Hepato-biliary-pancreatic medicine |
Others
NO
Comparison of complete stone removal rate of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment and balloon enteroscopy assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for large bile duct stone in patients with surgical altered anatomy
Safety
Complete stone removal rate
Adverse event rate, required session, procedure time
Observational
18 | years-old | <= |
95 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
From January 2016 to February 2025, patients and endoscopic procedures for bile duct stones in surgical altered anatomy (SAA) treated with either EUS-T or BE-ERCP.
Bile duct stone 12mm or more in diameter
In patients who underwent EUS-T sessions following failed BE-ERCP sessions, or BE-ERCP sessions following failed EUS-T sessions, each EUS-T and BE-ERCP both the failed and subsequent alternative sessions was analyzed and compared separately as an individual session series if there was no change in the size and number of target stones. Cases treated alternately with EUS-T and BE-ERCP repeatedly (e.g., first treatment with EUS-T, second with BE-ERCP, third with EUS-T), those treated using the rendezvous technique, those who underwent on going treatment, cases without adequate datasets were excluded.
130
1st name | Ryota |
Middle name | |
Last name | Sagami |
Oita University
Departement of Gastroenterology
8795593
1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamacho, Yufu, Oita, Japan
0975494411
sagami1985@yahoo.co.jp
1st name | Ryota |
Middle name | |
Last name | Sagami |
Oita University
Departement of Gastroenterology
8795593
1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamacho, Yufu, Oita, Japan
0975494411
sagami1985@yahoo.co.jp
Oita University
None
Japanese Governmental office
Oita University
1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamacho, Yufu, Oita, Japan
0975494411
sagami1985@yahoo.co.jp
NO
2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 17 | Day |
Unpublished
Open public recruiting
2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 27 | Day |
2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 27 | Day |
2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 17 | Day |
2029 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
None
2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 17 | Day |
2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 17 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000066882