| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000058037 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000066337 |
| Scientific Title | The Impact of Comparing Treatment Status with Other Patients on Adherence to CPAP Therapy (CPAP-League Trial) |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/06/25 |
| Last modified on | 2026/07/19 12:14:04 |
The Impact of Comparing Treatment Status with Other Patients on Adherence to CPAP Therapy (CPAP-League Trial)
CPAP League Trial
The Impact of Comparing Treatment Status with Other Patients on Adherence to CPAP Therapy (CPAP-League Trial)
CPAP League Trial
| Japan |
Sleep apnea
| Pneumology |
Others
NO
The primary objective of the study is to examine whether adherence to CPAP treatment improves in patients with SAS who have been undergoing CPAP therapy for a long period by showing them the treatment status of other patients.
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Pragmatic
Not applicable
The primary outcome is the number of participants whose CPAP adherence improved, comparing before and after the intervention.
CPAP adherence during the six months following the start of the intervention will be compared with adherence during the three months prior to obtaining consent. Improvement in adherence will be defined as meeting either of the following criteria:
(1) The average daily usage time increases by 30 minutes or more, or
(2) The average daily CPAP usage time increases, AND the proportion of days with CPAP usage of 4 hours or more per day increases by 10 percentage points or more.
In addition to the primary outcome, the following secondary outcomes were set:
(1) Change in the proportion of days with CPAP usage of 4 hours or more per day, comparing the 3 months prior to obtaining consent and the 6 months following the intervention
(2) Change in average daily CPAP usage time, comparing the 3 months prior to obtaining consent and the 6 months following the intervention
(3) Change in the proportion of days with CPAP usage of 4 hours or more per day, comparing the month prior to obtaining consent and the 6 months following the intervention
(4) Change in average daily CPAP usage time, comparing the month prior to obtaining consent and the 6 months following the intervention
(5) Change in sleepiness, comparing the time of enrollment and 6 months after the intervention
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
2
Educational,Counseling,Training
| Behavior,custom |
When a patient who is a potential participant visits the outpatient clinic for continuation of CPAP therapy, their CPAP adherence in the previous month will be reviewed. If the patient background characteristics and CPAP adherence in the previous month meet the inclusion criteria, written informed consent to participate will be obtained. After the planned number of patients providing consent has been reached, a postal item will be sent to confirm the accuracy of each participant address. The mailing will include a return postcard or a QR code so that the investigators could confirm that the participants received the mailing. Participants for whom delivery of the mailing to their address is confirmed will be eligible for randomization. Participants will then be randomized to a control group (receiving only information on their own CPAP adherence) or a peer-comparison group (receiving, in addition to the control information, information on CPAP adherence for the overall participant cohort).
For six months, once a month, information on CPAP adherence in the previous month will be mailed to each participant. The mailing will enclose a return postcard and a QR code, which participants will use to notify the investigators that they have opened the mailing. In the control group, the following information will be provided: (1) the average daily CPAP usage time in the previous month, and (2) the proportion of days with more than or equal to 4 hours of CPAP use.
When a patient who is a potential participant visits the outpatient clinic for continuation of CPAP therapy, their CPAP adherence in the previous month will be reviewed. If the patient background characteristics and CPAP adherence in the previous month meet the inclusion criteria, written informed consent to participate will be obtained. After the planned number of patients providing consent has been reached, a postal item will be sent to confirm the accuracy of each participant address. The mailing will include a return postcard or a QR code so that the investigators could confirm that the participants received the mailing. Participants for whom delivery of the mailing to their address is confirmed will be eligible for randomization. Participants will then be randomized to a control group (receiving only information on their own CPAP adherence) or a peer-comparison group (receiving, in addition to the control information, information on CPAP adherence for the overall participant cohort).
For six months, once a month, information on CPAP adherence in the previous month will be mailed to each participant. The mailing will enclose a return postcard and a QR code, which participants will use to notify the investigators that they have opened the mailing. In the peer-comparison group, the following information will be provided: (1) the average daily CPAP usage time in the previous month, and (2) the proportion of days with more than or equal to 4 hours of CPAP use.
In the peer-comparison group, in addition to this information, the following will also be provided: (3) a bar chart showing the distribution of average daily cpap usage time among all participants, (4) a bar chart showing the distribution of the proportion of days with at least 4 hours of cpap use among all participants, and (5) the participants rank within the entire cohort based on cpap usage time.
| 20 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
1. CPAP therapy has been initiated for SAS, diagnosed according to Japanese public health insurance criteria (apnea hypopnea index (AHI) >= 20/h by polysomnography, or respiratory event index (REI) is equal to or more than 40/h by portable monitoring device at the time of OSA diagnosis).
2. The patient is regularly attending outpatient visits to maintain CPAP therapy, in accordance with Japanese public health insurance requirements.
3. At least three months have passed since the introduction of the CPAP telemonitoring system.
A) Treatment adherence is already sufficiently good, with little need for further improvement. (Defined as a proportion of days with >4 hours of CPAP use of 90% or higher, and an average daily usage time >=7 hours over the past 1 month.)
B) No CPAP usage at all during the past 1 month (for example, due to business trips, caring for family members, or other social reasons resulting in an inability to use CPAP, and for whom improvement in adherence through this intervention is not expected).
C) Working night shifts twice or more a week.
D) Patients with cognitive impairment
186
| 1st name | Kimihiko |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Murase |
Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
Departement of Respiratory Medicine
606-8507
54 Kawaharacho Syogoin Sakyo Kyoto
0757513852
kyodaisuimin@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
| 1st name | Kimihiko |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Murase |
Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
Departement of Respiratory Medicine
606-8507
54 Kawaharacho Syogoin Sakyo Kyoto
0757513852
kyodaisuimin@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Kyoto university
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Japanese Governmental office
Kyoto University Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine, Ethics Committee
54 Kawaharacho Shogoin Sakyo Kyoto
0753667618
ethcom@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
NO
京都府
| 2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 25 | Day |
Unpublished
Enrolling by invitation
| 2025 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 07 | Month | 15 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2027 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 07 | Month | 19 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000066337