| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000057886 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000066055 |
| Scientific Title | Systematic Review on the Functional Benefits of Sleep Quality Improvement by Functional Ingredients "Hyperoside Derived from Apocynum venetum" and "Isoquercitrin Derived from Apocynum venetum" |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/05/26 |
| Last modified on | 2025/05/08 16:06:15 |
Systematic Review on the Functional Benefits of Sleep Quality Improvement by Functional Ingredients "Hyperoside Derived from Apocynum venetum" and "Isoquercitrin Derived from Apocynum venetum"
Systematic Review on the Improvement of Sleep Quality by "Hyperoside Derived from Apocynum venetum" and "Isoquercitrin Derived from Apocynum venetum"
Systematic Review on the Functional Benefits of Sleep Quality Improvement by Functional Ingredients "Hyperoside Derived from Apocynum venetum" and "Isoquercitrin Derived from Apocynum venetum"
Systematic Review on the Improvement of Sleep Quality by "Hyperoside Derived from Apocynum venetum" and "Isoquercitrin Derived from Apocynum venetum"
| Japan |
healthy adult men and women
| Adult |
Others
NO
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the intake of Hyperoside and Isoquercitrin derived from Apocynum venetum improves sleep quality compared to placebo intake in healthy adult men and women.
Efficacy
Sleep state measured by brain waves (such as the duration of REM sleep and non-REM sleep), subjective evaluation (questionnaires such as OSA-MA,VAS)
Others,meta-analysis etc
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
Participants P:"Healthy adult men and women." Excludes individuals with diseases, minors, pregnant women, and breastfeeding women.
Intervention I: "Oral intake of processed foods containing Hyperoside and Isoquercitrin derived from Apocynum venetum." Excludes cases where the amount of Hyperoside and Isoquercitrin derived from Apocynum venetum is not specified.
Placebo C: "Oral intake of processed foods not containing Hyperoside and Isoquercitrin derived from Apocynum venetum." Excludes cases where the processed foods contain Hyperoside, Isoquercitrin, or other ingredients that clearly affect the outcomes.
Outcome O: "Whether sleep quality improves." Objective evaluation includes sleep state measured by brain waves (such as the duration of REM sleep and non-REM sleep). Subjective evaluation includes questionnaires such as OSA-MA and VAS.
Exclude trials that do not meet the selection criteria, such as those including individuals with diseases.
| 1st name | Hisashi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Takeuchi |
Association of Japan CAM
N/A
151-0053
#306 Onogibiru,3-46-16 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo
03-6457-4911
info@ajcam.biz
| 1st name | Takeshi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Kaneko |
Japan Clinical Trial Association
N/A
1600022
5F, 4-3-17 Shinjuku, Shinjukuku, Tokyo
0364574666
info@yakujihou.org
Japan Clinical Trial Association
NAIA Corporation
Profit organization
Japan Clinical Trial Association
5F, 4-3-17 Shinjuku, Shinjukuku, Tokyo
0364574666
info@yakujihou.org
NO
| 2025 | Year | 05 | Month | 26 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
| 2025 | Year | 05 | Month | 07 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 05 | Month | 08 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 05 | Month | 08 | Day |
Search Strategy
For database searches in PubMed, JDream3, UMIN, and ClinicalTrials.gov, reviewers A and B will discuss and set the search formulas corresponding to the research question and PICOS. The search formulas will combine thesaurus terms and free words in the databases. For the trial design filter, the "sensitivity and precision-maximizing version" from the Cochrane library will be used. Additionally, using the Consumer Affairs Agency's notification information search, studies adopted in the research review will be extracted from cases where Hyperoside and Isoquercitrin derived from Apocynum venetum were applied as functional ingredients.
Bias Risk Assessment
Evaluate selection bias (randomization, allocation concealment), blinding bias (participants, outcome assessors), attrition bias (analysis methods, incomplete outcome data), selective outcome reporting, other biases, summary, and non-directness of individual studies. Assess the risk as "high," "medium/suspected," or "low."
Certainty Assessment
Evaluate the risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) for each outcome. Finally, these evaluations will be combined to assess the overall certainty of the evidence. The risk of bias, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) will be assessed in three levels: not serious, serious, and very serious. Certainty will be graded in four levels: A (strong), B (moderate), C (weak), and D (very weak).
| 2025 | Year | 05 | Month | 16 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 05 | Month | 08 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000066055