Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000058270 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000065902 |
Scientific Title | Influence of mesh modification and timing of imaging on 3D-CT visualization after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/06/25 |
Last modified on | 2025/06/25 11:40:08 |
Influence of mesh modification on 3D-CT visualization after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Influence of mesh modification on 3D-CT visualization after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Influence of mesh modification and timing of imaging on 3D-CT visualization after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Influence of mesh modification and timing of imaging on 3D-CT visualization after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Japan |
pelvic organ prolapse
Urology |
Others
NO
To investigate whether processing of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh used in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse improves its visualization on CT scans and whether the timing of imaging affects the visibility.
Safety,Efficacy
Exploratory
Pragmatic
Not applicable
CT scores for mesh visualization at 3 days and 6 weeks after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Assessment of safety, including the presence of mesh-related complications, up to 3 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Uncontrolled
NO
NO
NO
No need to know
1
Diagnosis
Device,equipment |
A modified PTFE mesh was used, in which the edges of the body portion were folded approximately 5 mm and double-layered by suturing with PTFE thread, for use in standard laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
50 | years-old | <= |
80 | years-old | > |
Female
1. Patients with pelvic organ prolapse who wish to undergo surgical treatment using mesh.
2. Patients who have received a full explanation of the study and provided written informed consent.
3. Patients with an ECOG Performance Status of 0.
4. Patients who are eligible for general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery.
1. Patients aged under 50 or over 80 at the time of consent.
2. Patients with suspected malignancy based on preoperative evaluation.
3. Patients judged to have impaired decision-making capacity.
4. Patients in whom mesh fixation is considered difficult based on pelvic examination or imaging findings.
5. Patients with a history of severe intra-abdominal adhesions or other conditions making laparoscopic surgery difficult.
6. Patients with severe glaucoma.
7. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus.
8. Any other patients deemed unsuitable for participation in this study or for undergoing the surgical procedure, as judged by the investigators.
19
1st name | Kosei |
Middle name | |
Last name | Miwa |
Japanese Red Cross Gifu Hospital
Urogynecology Center
5008175
3-36, Iwakura-cho, Gifu-shi, Gifu 500-8175, Japan
058-231-2266
shokkadelica@hotmail.com
1st name | Akane |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yamaguchi |
University of Tsukuba hospital
Urology
3058576
2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki
+81-29-853-3900
ayamaguchi-aic@umin.ac.jp
Japanese Red Cross Gifu Hospital
no cost
Self funding
Japanese Red Cross Gifu Hospital
3-36, Iwakura-cho, Gifu-shi, Gifu 500-8175, Japan
058-231-2266
ayamaguchi-aic@umin.ac.jp
NO
日本赤十字社 岐阜赤十字病院
2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 25 | Day |
Unpublished
19
No longer recruiting
2022 | Year | 09 | Month | 28 | Day |
2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 31 | Day |
2022 | Year | 12 | Month | 16 | Day |
2026 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
This study was prospectively designed and received ethical approval prior to initiation. However, registration in the UMIN system was performed retrospectively, after the completion of the primary outcome. The secondary outcome (safety assessment at 3 years postoperatively) is still ongoing.
2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 25 | Day |
2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 25 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000065902