Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000057692 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000065829 |
Scientific Title | Systematic Review on the Functional Effects of Salacinol Derived from Salacia in Suppressing Postprandial Blood Glucose Elevation |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/04/23 |
Last modified on | 2025/04/23 09:55:48 |
Systematic Review on the Functional Effects of Salacinol Derived from Salacia in Suppressing Postprandial Blood Glucose Elevation
Systematic Review on Postprandial Blood Glucose Related to Salacinol Derived from Salacia
Systematic Review on the Functional Effects of Salacinol Derived from Salacia in Suppressing Postprandial Blood Glucose Elevation
Systematic Review on Postprandial Blood Glucose Related to Salacinol Derived from Salacia
Japan |
Healthy adults with normal or borderline fasting blood glucose levels (<126 mg/dL)
Adult |
Others
NO
The aim was to investigate whether a single intake of Salacinol derived from Salacia suppresses the rise in postprandial blood glucose levels compared to placebo intake in healthy adults.
Efficacy
Postprandial blood glucose (30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes, AUC)
Others,meta-analysis etc
18 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
Participants P: Healthy adults with fasting blood glucose levels in the normal or borderline range (below 126 mg/dL).
Intervention I: A single oral intake of processed food containing Salacinol derived from Salacia. Limited to products based on Salacia reticulata with specified or clearly stated Salacinol content.
Placebo C: A single intake of processed food not containing Salacinol derived from Salacia. Excludes products containing Salacinol or other components known to affect outcomes, unless the content is minimal and deemed not to influence the outcome.
Outcome O: Suppression of postprandial blood glucose elevation. Blood glucose levels measured at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after intake, and their AUC.
Study Types S: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), randomized crossover trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, and non-RCTs. Included studies must be original articles written in English or Japanese. Short reports and articles are included only if the study content can be identified. Conference proceedings are excluded. No restrictions on the search period. Studies meeting the above criteria are grouped together without further categorization.
Trials that do not meet the selection criteria, such as those including patients with fasting blood glucose levels of 126 mg/dL or higher, will be excluded.
1st name | Hisashi |
Middle name | |
Last name | Takeuchi |
Association of Japan CAM
N/A
151-0053
#306 Onogibiru,3-46-16 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo
03-6457-4911
info@ajcam.biz
1st name | Takeshi |
Middle name | |
Last name | Kaneko |
Japan Clinical Trial Association
N/A
1600022
5F, 4-3-17 Shinjuku, Shinjukuku, Tokyo
0364574666
info@yakujihou.org
Japan Clinical Trial Association
KOEI KOGYO CO., LTD.
Profit organization
Japan Clinical Trial Association
5F, 4-3-17 Shinjuku, Shinjukuku, Tokyo
0364574666
info@yakujihou.org
NO
2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 23 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 22 | Day |
2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 24 | Day |
2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 24 | Day |
Search Strategy
For database searches in PubMed, JDream, UMIN, and ClinicalTrials.gov, reviewers A and B will discuss and set search formulas corresponding to the research question and PICOS. The search formulas will combine thesaurus terms and free words from the databases. For trial design filters, the "sensitivity- and precision-maximizing version" from the Cochrane library will be used. Additionally, the Consumer Affairs Agency's notification information search will be used to extract studies included in the research review from cases where Salacinol derived from Salacia was applied as a functional ingredient.
Bias Risk Assessment
Assessment will be conducted for selection bias (randomization, allocation concealment), blinding bias (participants, outcome assessors), attrition bias (analysis methods, incomplete outcome data), selective outcome reporting, other biases, summary, and non-directness of individual studies. Risk will be evaluated as "high", "medium/suspected", or "low".
Certainty Assessment
For each outcome, bias risk, non-directness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) will be evaluated, and these will be collectively assessed to determine the overall certainty of the evidence. Bias risk, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and other factors (such as publication bias) will be evaluated in three stages: not serious, serious, and very serious. Certainty will be graded in four levels: A (strong), B (moderate), C (weak), and D (very weak).
2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 23 | Day |
2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 23 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000065829