| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000057457 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000065628 |
| Scientific Title | Evaluation of the effectiveness of school climate intervention |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/03/31 |
| Last modified on | 2026/04/01 09:35:48 |
Project to evaluate the effect of school climate intervention
Project to evaluate the effect of school climate intervention
Evaluation of the effectiveness of school climate intervention
Evaluation of the effectiveness of school climate intervention
| Japan |
School climate
| Child |
Others
NO
To evaluate the effectiveness of school climate intervention.
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Not applicable
Adolescents' perceived school climate will be assessed using the Japanese version of the Beyond Blue School Climate Questionnaire (BBSCQ) (Shinde et al., 2019; Sasaki et al., in preparation). The response scale of the BBSCQ will be modified from a two-point to a six-point scale. The primary outcomes will be the BBSCQ total score and its subscale scores at the end of the eight-month intervention. Follow-up assessments at 12 and 20 months after the intervention will also be conducted and used as follow-up outcomes.
Shinde et al., Lancet, 2019;392(10163):2465-77
We will assess well-being, depressive symptoms, loneliness, problematic internet use, bullying victimisation, interpersonal trust, anger management, and the number of trusted adults at school using a self-report questionnaire. Data on school absenteeism (number of days absent) will be obtained from participating schools. For school absenteeism, the outcome will be the total number of days absent during the intervention period, while all other outcomes will be assessed using scores at the end of the eight-month intervention. The same assessments will also be conducted at 12 and 20 months after the intervention, and scores at each time point will be treated as secondary outcomes.
Well-being and depressive symptoms will be assessed using the WHO-5 (Awata et al., 2007) and the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) (Angold et al., 1995). Loneliness will be assessed using a single SMFQ item ("I felt lonely"). Problematic internet use will be assessed using the CIUS (Meerkerk et al., 2009). Bullying victimisation will be assessed using an adapted version of the OBVQ-R (Gaete et al., 2021). Interpersonal trust will be assessed using a single item ("Most people can be trusted") (Tsomokos et al., 2024). Anger management will be assessed using a single SDQ item ("I get very angry and often lose my temper.") (Goodman, 1997). The number of trusted adults at school will be assessed using a single item ("There are adults at school I can talk to easily"). School absenteeism will be treated as an exploratory outcome. In addition, fidelity assessments will be conducted to evaluate the extent to which interventions are implemented according to the current protocol.
Awata et al., Int Psychogeriatr, 2007;19:77-88
Angold et al., Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 1995;5:237-49
Meerkerk et al., Cyberpsychol Behav, 2009;12(1):1-6
Gaete et al., Front Psychol 2021;12:578661
Tsomokos et al., Nat Ment Health, 2024;2:328-36
Goodman R., J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 1997;38:581-86
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Cluster
Open -no one is blinded
Active
YES
NO
Institution is considered as a block.
YES
Central registration
2
Educational,Counseling,Training
| Other |
1. The intervention is a multicomponent whole-school programme aimed at improving school climate and adolescent mental health. It is implemented collaboratively with students and school staff under the support of an external coordinator.
2. The intervention comprises three components: a whole-school approach, a peer-group approach, and an individual approach.
The whole-school approach aims to strengthen opportunities for student voice, enhance communication within the school community, and promote awareness of school climate and mental health through school-wide activities.
The peer-group approach aims to promote students' active involvement in improving the school environment through participatory activities.
The individual approach aims to facilitate appropriate support for students experiencing difficulties by linking them to existing school-based support resources where necessary.
3. To disseminate activities across the whole school, capture students' views, and share information, the following activities may be implemented under the support of the coordinator as needed:
- Establishment of mechanisms to collect students' opinions and suggestions
- School-wide surveys to gather students' views
- Communication of activities and progress
- Dissemination of information through posters and other materials
- Presentations at school assemblies and other events
(Continued)
4. Opportunities will be provided for students and school staff to engage in discussions on topics related to school climate, including mental health, interpersonal relationships, bullying, digital device use, and diversity, equity, and inclusion.
5. Students' participation will be encouraged as needed to support the implementation of activities described in sections 3 and 4.
6. Coordinators will receive training prior to the start of the intervention and ongoing supervision during the intervention period. Fidelity assessments will be conducted to evaluate the extent to which the intervention is implemented as intended.
7. Opportunities will be provided for school staff to enhance their understanding of the purpose and content of the intervention to facilitate its smooth implementation.
| 12 | years-old | <= |
| 16 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
Participants will be first-year students in Japanese public junior high schools and senior high schools.
As this study implements the intervention at the school level, participating schools will first be recruited. Eligibility criteria for schools are public junior high schools or public senior high schools.
Randomisation
Once candidate schools are identified, allocation to intervention or control groups will be conducted using a computer-generated random sequence. Stratified randomisation will be applied to balance school characteristics (e.g., school type and region). The allocation ratio will be 1:1. Randomisation will be conducted by a researcher who is not involved in the implementation of the intervention or outcome assessment, and the allocation will be communicated to the participating schools.
Allocation concealment is not applicable in this study, as it is a whole-school intervention implemented at the school level. Schools and teaching staff need to be aware of the allocation in order to implement the intervention.
However, after allocation at the school level, an approximately one-year embedding phase will be conducted to allow schools to understand and fully implement the intervention. Outcome evaluation will be conducted using data from all first-year students newly enrolled in the following academic year who were not exposed to the intervention during the embedding phase.
This design ensures that participants included in the evaluation are not exposed to the intervention at the time of allocation and are assessed without being influenced by allocation status. This type of embedding phase is essential for implementing complex whole-school interventions (Shinde et al., 2018).
Shinde et al., Lancet, 2019;392(10163):2465-77
None.
1400
| 1st name | Atsushi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Nishida |
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science
Research Center for Social Science & Medicine
156-8506
2-1-6 Kamikitazawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo
+81-3-5316-3100
nishida-at@igakuken.or.jp
| 1st name | Satoshi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Yamaguchi |
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science
Research Center for Social Science & Medicine
156-8506
2-1-6 Kamikitazawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo
+81-3-5316-3100
yamaguchi-st@igakuken.or.jp
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science
Tokyo Metropolitan Government
Local Government
Human Subjects Ethics Committee, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science
2-1-6 Kamikitazawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo
+81-3-6834-2391
renkei@igakuken.or.jp
NO
| 2025 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
Unpublished
Enrolling by invitation
| 2025 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 03 | Month | 27 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2028 | Year | 01 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2028 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2028 | Year | 04 | Month | 30 | Day |
| 2028 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
Power analysis
Power analysis was conducted regarding the change in BBSCQ scores from baseline to the eight-month intervention (primary outcome) between the intervention and control groups, to assess the effectiveness of the intervention, using PowerUpR (Dong & Maynard, 2013). The intervention and control groups were set at a 1:1 ratio. Based on a prior school climate intervention (Shinde et al., 2019), the effect size of the intervention was set at d = 0.6, with an intra-class correlation of schools at 0.10. The standard number of students per grade in schools was assumed to be 100, with a dropout rate of 10%, considering the high participation and retention rates in school-based studies. The correlation between baseline BBSCQ scores and scores at the eight-month intervention was assumed to be r = 0.5. A two-tailed test was utilized, with a significance level of a = 0.05. Under these conditions, sufficient statistical power (0.88) was achieved with a total of 14 schools (7 intervention schools and 7 control schools) (n = 1400), using the statistical model shown in the "Other" section.
Dong & Maynard, J Res Educ Eff, 2013;6(1):24-67
Shinde et al., Lancet, 2019;392(10163):2465-77
Statistical analysis
All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Intervention effects will be evaluated by comparing outcome scores between groups at 8, 12, and 20 months after the intervention. The same analyses will also be conducted for secondary outcomes. Prespecified subgroup analyses will be conducted according to gender, school type, and baseline depressive symptom severity. These analyses will be exploratory and aim to assess potential heterogeneity of intervention effects.
| 2025 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000065628