| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000057158 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000065084 |
| Scientific Title | Feasibility and safety of a novel thin therapeutic endoscope combination surgery for gastrointestinal tumors: A retrospective cohort study |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/02/27 |
| Last modified on | 2025/04/11 23:25:13 |
Pilot clinical evaluation of a novel dual-operator endoscopic technique (TECS) for gastrointestinal tumor resection: Technical feasibility, safety, and learning curve analysis
TECS study
Feasibility and safety of a novel thin therapeutic endoscope combination surgery for gastrointestinal tumors: A retrospective cohort study
TECS study
| Japan |
Gastrointestinal tumor
| Gastroenterology |
Malignancy
NO
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of TECS, a treatment using two thin-diameter therapeutic endoscopes devised at our facility, through a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent the procedure.
Safety,Efficacy
The primary outcome measure was defined as the success rate of the procedure, which was defined as the completion of the treatment procedure from start to finish using only TECS.
Secondary outcomes included the en bloc resection rate, procedure time, resection speed, and rate of adverse events.
Observational
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| 100 | years-old | > |
Male and Female
Patients included in the study were aged 18 years or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2, and had been diagnosed with an epithelial tumor of the stomach or large intestine deemed suitable for ESD based on preoperative endoscopic evaluation. The TECS eligibility criteria were the same as those for ESD, which were based on the treatment guidelines for gastrointestinal cancer in Japan [12,13]. The size, shape, location, and fibrosis of the tumor were not taken into account. Only patients who received a full explanation of the procedure, its associated risks, and alternative treatment options and who provided written informed consent, were included in the study.
Patients were excluded if they had incomplete clinical records regarding preoperative assessment, procedural details, or postoperative course; if there was a discrepancy between the endoscopic diagnosis and the final pathological findings (e.g., no tumor identified); if adequate sedation could not be achieved; or if they declined to provide written informed consent despite receiving a full explanation of the procedure and associated risks.
43
| 1st name | Takuma |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Okamura |
Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center
gastroenterology
850-8555
6-39 Shinchi-cho, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki
0958223251
taku.okamu1002@gmail.com
| 1st name | Takuma |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Okamura |
Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center
gastroenterology
850-8555
6-39 Shinchi-cho, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki
0958223251
taku.okamu1002@gmail.com
Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center
Takuma Okamura
none
Other
Nagasaki Minato Medical Center Research and Development Center
6-39 Shinchi-cho, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki
0958223251
kenkyu@ncho.jp
NO
| 2025 | Year | 02 | Month | 27 | Day |
Unpublished
44
Completed
| 2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 25 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 02 | Month | 27 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 02 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
Outcomes and definitions
The primary outcome measure was defined as the success rate of the procedure, which was defined as the completion of the treatment procedure from start to finish using only TECS. Secondary outcomes included the en bloc resection rate, procedure time, resection speed, and rate of adverse events. En bloc resection was defined as the removal of the lesion as a single mass. The procedure time was measured from the start of the peripheral incision to the end of resection. Resection speed was calculated by dividing the approximated ellipsoidal surface area of the resected specimen (using its long and short diameters) by the procedure time. Adverse events included intraoperative perforation,post operative bleeding, or postoperative perforation.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. All statistical analyses were performed using Bell Curve for Excel. Continuous variables are expressed as means standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs), depending on the data distribution. Categorical variables are presented as percentages.
| 2025 | Year | 02 | Month | 27 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 11 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000065084