UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000056843
Receipt number R000064927
Scientific Title A Systematic Review of the effect of intake of functional ingredients of barley-derived beta glucan in reducing postprandial Blood Glucose rise
Date of disclosure of the study information 2025/01/31
Last modified on 2025/03/13 16:08:08

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

A Systematic Review of the effect of intake of functional ingredients of barley-derived beta glucan in reducing postprandial Blood Glucose rise

Acronym

SR of the effect of Barley-derived beta glucan in reducing postprandial Blood Glucose rise

Scientific Title

A Systematic Review of the effect of intake of functional ingredients of barley-derived beta glucan in reducing postprandial Blood Glucose rise

Scientific Title:Acronym

SR of the effect of Barley-derived beta-glucan in reducing postprandial Blood Glucose rise

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Male and female adults whose fasting or postprandial blood glucose in borderline or high levels, and healthy male and female adults. Those who are planning to become pregnant, expectant or nursing mothers, and breastfeeding women are excluded.

Classification by specialty

Not applicable Adult

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The object is to investigate whether the intake of barley-derived beta-glucan affects to improve fasting or postprandial blood glucose in borderline or high levels' male and female adults, and healthy male and female adults based on a Systematic Review.

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

The effect of intake of barley-derived beta-glucan on Area under the blood concentration curve (AUC) and the postprandial blood glucose levels

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Others,meta-analysis etc


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

18 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

(PICOS)
P (Participant): Male and female adults whose fasting or postprandial blood glucose level: 110-125 mg/dl, 75gOGTT 2 hour after value: 110-125 mg/dl, casual blood glucose level: 140-199 mg/dl, and healthy male and female adults. Minors, pregnant women (including those planning pregnant), lactating mothers, patients with diabetes mellitus, BMI less than 18.5, 30 or above are excluded.
I (Intervention): Foods containing barley-derived beta-glucan (regardless of food form) should be taken orally. The duration of intake is one time. Studies with unknown barley-derived beta-glucan content are excluded.
C (Comparison): Comparison target, Intake of barley-derived beta-glucan-free placebo
O (Outcome measurement): The primary outcome is the evaluated value of the effect of intake of barley-derived beta-glucan on Area under the blood concentration curve (AUC) and the postprandial blood glucose levels.
S (Study design): Randomised controlled trials are conducted. A significant difference test is performed on the test results by statistical analysis. The test arm must contain a food or beverage containing barley-derived beta-glucan. Intervention trials without a placebo group and studies using foods with multiple ingredients other than barley-derived beta-glucan as functional components are not included. Only peer-reviewed original papers are eligible.

Key exclusion criteria

Trials that include women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, women who are planning to become pregnant, or people who are being treated for hypertension
Studies with unknown barley-derived beta-glucan content
Papers citing the test results of the original paper, explanatory papers, abstracts of conference presentations, conference proceedings

Target sample size



Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Kuniyoshi
Middle name
Last name Shimizu

Organization

Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate school of Kyushu University

Division name

Laboratory of Systematic Forest and Forest Products Science

Zip code

819-0395

Address

19-0395 744 Motooka, Nishiku-Fukuoka City

TEL

092-802-4675

Email

shimizu.kuniyoshi.381@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Seiichi
Middle name
Last name Hattori

Organization

Kurume Research Park Co., Ltd.

Division name

Bio Project Division

Zip code

839-0864

Address

1-1 Hyakunenkoen,Kurume City, Fukuoka

TEL

0942-37-6124

Homepage URL


Email

fbv@kurume-rp.co.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Kyushu University

Institute

Department

Personal name

Kuniyoshi Shimizu


Funding Source

Organization

Kurume Research Park Co., Ltd.

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Profit organization

Nationality of Funding Organization

Japan


Other related organizations

Co-sponsor

Evaluation Center of Health and Nutrition Inc.
Kenichi Kakino

Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

N/A

Address

N/A

Tel

N/A

Email

N/A


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2025 Year 01 Month 31 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Preinitiation

Date of protocol fixation

2024 Year 11 Month 11 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2025 Year 01 Month 31 Day

Last follow-up date

2025 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

The research process involves a team of three experienced individuals, A, B, and C, who independently conduct searches using academic article databases and clinical trial registries, as well as the Foods with Functional Claims Notification Database. In cases where their findings do not align, discussions are held, and if necessary, a fourth member, C, will make the final decision on the acceptance or rejection of results.
The selection of studies and data extraction is similarly conducted independently by A, B, and C, with a structured approach to resolving discrepancies through consultation and, if needed, confirmation by C. The evaluation of bias risk in research papers is performed using established guidelines, and any uncertainties in the data are addressed by contacting the authors directly.
To assess the reliability of studies, the team evaluates various factors such as indirectness, inaccuracy, and publication bias, referencing specific clinical practice guidelines.
In synthesizing results, studies with similar designs and high PICO item similarity are pooled, while those with high bias risk are excluded. Missing data is addressed by reaching out to authors, and if unresponsive, it is treated as a missing value. Meta-analysis is conducted using statistical software, with subgroup analyses performed in cases of high heterogeneity.
The certainty of the evidence is quantified based on the evaluation of indirectness, inaccuracy, inconsistency, and publication bias, with a scoring system that categorizes the evidence into high, medium, low, and very low certainty levels. This structured approach ensures a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of the research findings.


Management information

Registered date

2025 Year 01 Month 28 Day

Last modified on

2025 Year 03 Month 13 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000064927