| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000056760 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000064874 |
| Scientific Title | Comparative effectiveness and safety of follitropin delta versus follitropin alpha in Japanese real-world ART practice: a propensity score-matched retrospective observational cohort study (FALCON study) |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/01/20 |
| Last modified on | 2026/05/25 10:30:52 |
A real-world retrospective study comparing two ovarian stimulation drugs (follitropin delta and follitropin alpha) in Japanese IVF practice
FALCON Study (Follitropin ALfa vs delta CONparison)
Comparative effectiveness and safety of follitropin delta versus follitropin alpha in Japanese real-world ART practice: a propensity score-matched retrospective observational cohort study (FALCON study)
FALCON Study
| Japan |
Infertility (cases with indication for in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer)
| Obstetrics and Gynecology |
Others
NO
Follitropin delta is a novel recombinant FSH derived from a human cell line, characterized by an individualized dosing algorithm based on serum anti-Mullerian hormone and body weight. While its non-inferiority to Follitropin alfa has been demonstrated in large-scale RCTs, real-world comparative data in Japanese clinical practice remain limited. This study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of Follitropin alfa and Follitropin delta using single-center retrospective cohort data, with patient background balanced through propensity score matching.
Safety,Efficacy
Number of good-quality blastocysts per oocyte retrieval cycle (num_good_bl)
Statistical model: Negative binomial regression with cluster-robust standard errors (clustered by patient)
Effect measure: Rate ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval
Non-inferiority margin: lower bound of 95% CI for RR > 0.80
Number of oocytes retrieved
Number of mature (M2) oocytes
Number of fertilized embryos
Number of good-quality cleavage-stage embryos
Number of blastocysts
Number of frozen embryos
Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle (gestational sac confirmed at 5 weeks)
Ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle (fetal heartbeat at 9 weeks)
Live birth rate per cycle
Incidence of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS, Golan grade 2)
Incidence of severe OHSS (Golan grade 3)
Rate of reaching embryo transfer
Observational
| 20 | years-old | <= |
| 43 | years-old | > |
Female
Cycles in which controlled ovarian stimulation with either Follitropin alfa or Follitropin delta was performed for in-vitro fertilization
Cycles in which oocyte retrieval was performed
Cycles treated at the participating institution within the study period
Non-IVF stimulation purposes (e.g., in-vitro maturation)
Natural cycles without exogenous stimulation
Cycles with missing critical baseline covariate (age)
4000
| 1st name | Shinnosuke |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Komiya |
HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic
Gynecology
530-0011
Grand Front Osaka Tower B 15F, 3-1, Ofuka-cho, Kita-ku, Osaka city, Osaka, Japan
0663778824
komiya520@ivfjapan.com
| 1st name | Shinnosuke |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Komiya |
HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic
Gynecology
530-0011
Grand Front Osaka Tower B 15F, 3-1, Ofuka-cho, Kita-ku, Osaka city, Osaka, Japan
0663778824
komiya520@ivfjapan.com
HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic
Self-funding
Self funding
HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic
Grand Frront Osaka Tower B 15F, 3-1, Ofuka-cho, Kita-ku, Osaka city, Osaka, Japan
0663778824
komiya520@ivfjapan.com
NO
| 2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
Partially published
4056
From 4,056 eligible cycles (alpha 3,598; delta 458), 1:1 propensity score matching after 20 imputations yielded a mean of 456 pairs. The primary outcome of good blastocysts per cycle had adjusted RR 1.12 (95%CI 0.84-1.49), meeting the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 0.80. Oocyte yield was lower with delta (RR 0.91) but fertilization, blastocyst, pregnancy, and live birth rates were similar. Moderate-to-severe OHSS was numerically lower with delta (20.4% vs 23.9%; OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.51-1.16).
| 2026 | Year | 05 | Month | 25 | Day |
| Delay expected |
A manuscript reporting the full results of this study has been submitted and is currently under peer review. Detailed final results will be publicly available upon journal publication.
Baseline characteristics in the eligible cohort (n=4,056 cycles): follitropin alpha (n=3,598) vs follitropin delta (n=458).
Age: 37.1 +/- 4.1 vs 35.8 +/- 4.2 years (SMD -0.307)
BMI (median, IQR): 20.58 (19.22-22.50) vs 20.70 (19.22-22.21) kg/m^2 (SMD -0.025)
AMH (median, IQR): 1.65 (0.75-3.35) vs 2.60 (1.58-4.28) ng/mL (SMD +0.284)
Basal FSH (median, IQR): 8.10 (6.50-10.10) vs 7.30 (6.30-8.90) mIU/mL (SMD -0.323)
Primary infertility: 46.0% vs 48.9% (SMD +0.058)
Stimulation protocol: GnRH antagonist 43.0% vs 43.7%; PPOS 29.1% vs 52.6% (SMD +0.492); mild stimulation 24.7% vs 3.1% (SMD -0.659); GnRH agonist 3.0% vs 0.7%
CC/letrozole co-administration: 23.9% vs 5.7% (SMD -0.532)
Fertilization method: ICSI 74.7% vs 74.7%; IVF 12.5% vs 16.4%; split 3.7% vs 5.5%
Calendar year of OPU: 2022, 22.0% vs 23.8%; 2023, 38.4% vs 38.0%; 2024, 39.5% vs 38.2%
Total dose (median, IQR): alpha 1,350 (900-1,725) IU; delta 72 (54-96) mcg
After 1:1 propensity score matching (representative imputation: 914 cycles), all 16 covariates achieved absolute SMD < 0.10. Post-matching mean age was 35.6-35.8 years in both groups, median AMH 2.50-2.59 ng/mL, PPOS use 52.5-53.6%, and CC/letrozole co-administration 4.4-5.7%.
Source database: 4,885 cycles / 2,487 patients (January 2022 - December 2024).
Excluded (n=18): IVM cycles 9, natural cycles (dose=0) 9. After IVM and natural cycle exclusion: 4,867 cycles.
Excluded (n=811): age <20 years 2, age >=43 years 809.
Eligible cohort (UMIN-CTR criteria): 4,056 cycles / 2,271 patients (alpha 3,598; delta 458). After multiple imputation by chained equations (m=20, predictive mean matching), the propensity score was estimated by L2-penalized logistic regression (age, BMI, AMH, FSH, parity, method, year, CC, fertilization). 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching with caliper 0.2 x SD(logit PS) without replacement was performed independently in each of the 20 imputed datasets. Matched pairs per imputation: 455-458 (mean 456). Unmatched delta cycles per imputation: 0-3 (mean 2; no alpha control within caliper). Representative matched cohort: 914 cycles / 775 patients. Doubly-robust outcome analysis (negative binomial regression for count outcomes; logistic regression for binary outcomes; patient-level cluster-robust standard errors) was conducted on each of the 20 matched cohorts, and effect estimates were pooled across imputations using Rubin's rules.
The pre-specified safety outcomes were ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) events graded by the Golan classification. Results in the matched cohort (n=914; 457 cycles per group):
Moderate-to-severe OHSS (Golan grade >= 2): follitropin alpha 109/457 (23.9%); follitropin delta 93/457 (20.4%). Absolute risk difference -3.5 percentage points (number needed to treat approximately 29 to prevent one moderate-to-severe OHSS event). Adjusted OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.51-1.16; p=0.206).
Severe OHSS (Golan grade >= 3): alpha 10/457 (2.2%); delta 11/457 (2.4%). Adjusted OR 0.90 (95% CI 0.27-2.94; p=0.859).
No other drug-related serious adverse events were recorded in this dataset. As a retrospective observational study using routine clinical data, adverse event ascertainment relied on documentation during standard clinical care. No additional drug-related deaths or discontinuation events were reported during the study period.
Primary outcome (pre-specified): number of good-quality blastocysts per oocyte retrieval cycle (Gardner >=3BB at days 5-6). In the matched cohort, alpha 1.01 +/- 1.97 (median 0, IQR 0-1) vs delta 1.09 +/- 1.97 (median 0, IQR 0-1). Doubly-robust adjusted RR 1.12 (95% CI 0.84-1.49; p=0.427). Pre-specified non-inferiority margin (lower 95% CI bound > 0.80) was met.
Secondary outcomes (matched cohort, n=457 per group):
Oocytes retrieved: 10.77 vs 9.49 (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99, p=0.033)
M2 oocytes: 8.50 vs 7.46 (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98, p=0.017)
Fertilized embryos: 6.01 vs 5.79 (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.87-1.10, p=0.698)
Good cleavage embryos: 4.77 vs 4.54 (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-1.09, p=0.551)
Blastocysts: 2.34 vs 2.29 (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83-1.31, p=0.724)
Frozen embryos: 2.86 vs 2.73 (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.85-1.14, p=0.860)
Reached embryo transfer: 289/457 (63.2%) vs 319/457 (69.8%) (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.84-1.78, p=0.283)
Clinical pregnancy per cycle (5-week GS): 138/457 (30.2%) vs 141/457 (30.9%) (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.69-1.45, p=0.999)
Ongoing pregnancy per cycle (9-week HB): 112/457 (24.5%) vs 117/457 (25.6%) (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.72-1.57, p=0.767)
Live birth per cycle (strict; ongoing as failure): 78/457 (17.1%) vs 76/457 (16.6%) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.62-1.53, p=0.914)
Live birth per cycle (optimistic; ongoing as success): 109/457 (23.9%) vs 113/457 (24.7%) (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.70-1.57, p=0.813)
All effect estimates were doubly-robust adjusted (propensity score covariates also entered in the outcome model), with patient-level cluster-robust standard errors, pooled across 20 imputed datasets using Rubin's rules. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin applied to the primary outcome only (achieved).
Sharing plan: Available on reasonable request (conditional sharing)
The individual participant data analyzed in this study will not be deposited in a public repository because they contain detailed individual-level clinical information (including treatment dates, demographics, and reproductive outcomes) for which patient privacy considerations preclude open sharing. De-identified data may be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to a data-sharing agreement and approval by the institutional review board of Medical Corporation Sankeikai. Sharing will be limited to requests with the same scientific purpose (comparative effectiveness and safety of follitropin delta vs alpha) or for meta-analysis. Analytical code is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Requests will be accepted for 3 years after publication.
No longer recruiting
| 2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
none
| 2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 20 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 05 | Month | 25 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000064874