| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000056619 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000064711 |
| Scientific Title | Influences of gait training with knee-ankle-foot orthosis on gait ability and independence in severe hemiplegia and pusher behavior with unilateral spatial neglect following stroke: A retrospective historical controlled study |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2025/01/06 |
| Last modified on | 2025/01/03 14:40:47 |
Influences of gait training with knee-ankle-foot orthosis on gait ability and independence in severe hemiplegia and pusher behavior with unilateral spatial neglect following stroke: A retrospective historical controlled study
Influences of gait training with knee-ankle-foot orthosis on gait ability and independence in severe hemiplegia and pusher behavior with unilateral spatial neglect following stroke: A retrospective historical controlled study
Influences of gait training with knee-ankle-foot orthosis on gait ability and independence in severe hemiplegia and pusher behavior with unilateral spatial neglect following stroke: A retrospective historical controlled study
Influences of gait training with knee-ankle-foot orthosis on gait ability and independence in severe hemiplegia and pusher behavior with unilateral spatial neglect following stroke: A retrospective historical controlled study
| Japan |
In patients after stroke
| Rehabilitation medicine |
Others
NO
This study aimed to influence of gait training using KAFOs on gait ability and independent in patients with severe stroke hemiplegia and pusher behavior following USN.
Safety,Efficacy
Scale for Contraversive Pushing (SCP), BITc (BIT-conventional test), Subjective Postural Vertical (SPV), SPV with eyes opened (SPV-EO) direction errors, variability errors, functional ambulation category; FAC and gait independence (FIM-gait).
Observational
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| 90 | years-old | > |
Male and Female
The inclusion criteria comprised first-ever stroke cases, Brunnstrom Recovery Stage-Lower Limb (BRS-L) under III, indicating severe hemiplegia.
Exclusion criteria included BRS over IV, dementia, multiple cerebral infarctions, hydrocephalus, and poor understanding.
34
| 1st name | Kota |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Sawa |
SBC Tokyo Medical University
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences
2798567
5-8-1 Akemi, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan
08012079205
k-sawa@sbctmu.ac.jp
| 1st name | Kota |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Sawa |
SBC Tokyo Medical University
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences
2798567
5-8-1 Akemi, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan
08012079205
k-sawa@sbctmu.ac.jp
SBC Tokyo Medical University
Kota Sawa
SBC Tokyo Medical University
Self funding
SBC Tokyo Medical University
5-8-1, Akemi, Urayasu, Chiba, Japan, 279-8567
08012079205
k-sawa@sbctmu.ac.jp
YES
No. 000049806
The University Hospital Medical Information Network Center
| 2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 06 | Day |
https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3001
Unpublished
https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3001
44
A significant interaction was noted between gait independence and FAC, as well as a simple primary effect of timing and group; the pusher group exhibited a lower degree of improvement at discharge (p<0.05). Multiple regression analysis was used to predict the long-term prognosis of gait independence in patients with severe hemiplegia, KAFOs, and pusher behavior.
| 2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 03 | Day |
The participant pool included 44 patients, comprising 22 hemiplegics and 22 patients with pusher behavior. Demographic data were matched using a propensity score (PS) to adjust for heterogeneity in background factors (baseline covariates) at a new study-patient ratio of 1:1.
Procedure A
A significant interaction was noted between gait independence and FAC, as well as a simple primary effect of timing and group; the pusher group exhibited a lower degree of improvement at discharge (p<0.05, Table 2, Figure 3).
Procedure B
Multiple regression analysis was used to predict the long-term prognosis of gait independence in patients with severe hemiplegia, KAFOs, and pusher behavior. The study items included age, sex, onset days, BRS-L, MMSE, damaged hemispheric side, SIAS, SCP, BITc, SPV, SPV-EO directional errors, and variability errors. Onset days and SPV variability errors were identified as influencing factors in severe hemiplegia cases, and SPV-EO variability errors in pusher cases, each with moderate regression coefficients (p<0.05) (Table 3).
None.
For outcomes in procedure A: two-way analysis of variance was utilized to confirm interactions and simple main effects, using the Bonferroni method as a post-hoc test (p<0.05). For outcomes in procedure B: multiple regression analysis (stepwise method) was applied to examine gait independence within the two groups.28 Factor analysis variables were analyzed using group gait ability (FAC and FIM) as the dependent variable and characteristic factors as the independent variables (p<0.05).
Completed
| 2017 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2021 | Year | 11 | Month | 18 | Day |
| 2017 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
Procedure A: The long-term prognosis was evaluated in two groups of patients: those with severe motor paralysis and those with severe motor paralysis along with pusher behavior.
Procedure B: Factors influencing gait ability in pusher cases were investigated. The timing of KAFOs use in both groups was defined as within 1 week of the rehabilitation prescription date in sub-acute-phase hospital. Furthermore, considering the severity of motor paralysis, patients utilized KAFOs for over 3 months during rehabilitation and ADLs.
Regarding the utilization of KAFOs in the course of routine rehabilitation, patients received physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy for 3 h, 7 days a week, over consecutive weeks. During specific interventions, KAFOs were employed for 1 h during standing and gait exercises (Figure 2). In ADLs scenarios, transfers and toileting were permitted with AFOs. Patients were allowed to use AFOs for transferring and toileting in ADLs situations and to continue gait rehabilitation using KAFOs or AFOs throughout the intervention period.
| 2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 03 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 03 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000064711