UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000056327 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000064358 |
| Scientific Title | A study comparing the educational effectiveness of video and paper-based teaching materials in the education of medical students on diagnostic errors |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2024/12/02 |
| Last modified on | 2025/06/04 16:11:42 |
* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments
Basic information
Public title
A study comparing the educational effectiveness of video and paper-based teaching materials in the education of medical students on diagnostic errors
Acronym
Research on the effectiveness of teaching medical students about diagnostic errors using videos
Scientific Title
A study comparing the educational effectiveness of video and paper-based teaching materials in the education of medical students on diagnostic errors
Scientific Title:Acronym
Research on the effectiveness of teaching medical students about diagnostic errors using videos
Region
| Japan |
Condition
Condition
none
Classification by specialty
| Adult |
Classification by malignancy
Others
Genomic information
NO
Objectives
Narrative objectives1
In Japan, it has been reported that when medical students were given a one-hour lesson on diagnostic errors, they became more aware of the importance of learning about diagnostic errors, and on the other hand, they no longer felt the need to blame those who made diagnostic errors or felt ashamed of having made diagnostic errors, but there have been no reports in Japan to date evaluating the effectiveness of this approach in reducing diagnostic errors. In the United States, it has been reported that reflecting on diagnostic errors did not have any effect on reducing subsequent diagnostic errors among medical students. The reason for this is thought to be that medical students are not performing professional medical practice in the first place. Therefore, in a report that examined the effectiveness of diagnostic error education for medical students in the United States, it was suggested that simulation education using simulated patients may be effective. However, this report was a pilot study, and there was no evaluation of the actual video content created. After that, we were unable to find any other studies that used video content to educate medical students about diagnostic errors, as far as the research representative could find.
Therefore, this study is the world's first research to evaluate the effectiveness of educational content using simulated diagnostic error experiences from the perspective of doctors for medical students.
Basic objectives2
Efficacy
Basic objectives -Others
Trial characteristics_1
Trial characteristics_2
Developmental phase
Assessment
Primary outcomes
The period of time the research subjects are scheduled to participate in the research
The research subjects will participate in the observation period within one month of agreeing to take part in the survey
Observation and examination items
The subjects' age, grade, university affiliation (national, municipal, or private), and whether or not they had previously taken a lecture on diagnostic errors were evaluated. In addition, the subjects were asked to evaluate the effectiveness of educational videos and diagnostic error lectures they had previously taken using a 7-point Likert scale. The qualitative aspects were analyzed using content analysis, and questions were asked based on themes set in accordance with the revised Bloom's taxonomy.
Key secondary outcomes
Base
Study type
Interventional
Study design
Basic design
Parallel
Randomization
Randomized
Randomization unit
Individual
Blinding
Open -no one is blinded
Control
Active
Stratification
Dynamic allocation
Institution consideration
Blocking
Concealment
Intervention
No. of arms
2
Purpose of intervention
Educational,Counseling,Training
Type of intervention
| Other |
Interventions/Control_1
Watch the 5 diagnostic error videos and answer the questionnaire.
Interventions/Control_2
Paper data of diagnostic error
Interventions/Control_3
Interventions/Control_4
Interventions/Control_5
Interventions/Control_6
Interventions/Control_7
Interventions/Control_8
Interventions/Control_9
Interventions/Control_10
Eligibility
Age-lower limit
| 21 | years-old | <= |
Age-upper limit
| 60 | years-old | >= |
Gender
Male and Female
Key inclusion criteria
5th or 6th year medical student
Medical student who has completed CBT and OSCE
Those who have consented to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria
Persons deemed unsuitable as research subjects by the principal investigator
Target sample size
134
Research contact person
Name of lead principal investigator
| 1st name | Taiju |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Miyagami |
Organization
Juntendo University Hospital
Division name
Department of general medicine
Zip code
1138431
Address
Tokyoto Bunkyo-ku Hongo
TEL
0338133111
tmiyaga@juntendo.ac.jp
Public contact
Name of contact person
| 1st name | Taiju |
| Middle name | Yamashita, |
| Last name | Miyagami |
Organization
Juntendo University Hospital
Division name
General medicine
Zip code
1138431
Address
Tokyo Bunkyo-ku Hongo
TEL
08050657077
Homepage URL
tmiyaga@juntendo.ac.jp
Sponsor or person
Institute
Juntendo University Hospital
Institute
Department
Personal name
Funding Source
Organization
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Organization
Division
Category of Funding Organization
Japanese Governmental office
Nationality of Funding Organization
Other related organizations
Co-sponsor
Name of secondary funder(s)
IRB Contact (For public release)
Organization
Juntendo University Hospital
Address
Tokyo Bunkyo-ku Hongo
Tel
0338133111
tmiyaga@juntendo.ac.jp
Secondary IDs
Secondary IDs
YES
Study ID_1
E24-0064
Org. issuing International ID_1
Juntendo University Hospital
Study ID_2
Org. issuing International ID_2
IND to MHLW
Institutions
Institutions
Other administrative information
Date of disclosure of the study information
| 2024 | Year | 12 | Month | 02 | Day |
Related information
URL releasing protocol
Publication of results
Partially published
Result
URL related to results and publications
Number of participants that the trial has enrolled
134
Results
The video-based group showed a greater improvement from baseline knowledge compared to the paper-based group (mean change: 1.6 vs. 1.9, p = 0.019). 17 themes and subcategories corresponding to the six cognitive process dimensions of Fink's important learning classification were identified.The most frequent themes were related to immersive learning styles, the application of diagnostic error processes, and the consideration of diverse perspectives on diagnostic errors.
Results date posted
| 2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 04 | Day |
Results Delayed
Results Delay Reason
Date of the first journal publication of results
Baseline Characteristics
Japanese medical student.
Participant flow
Adverse events
Outcome measures
None.
Plan to share IPD
IPD sharing Plan description
Progress
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Date of protocol fixation
| 2024 | Year | 06 | Month | 14 | Day |
Date of IRB
| 2024 | Year | 06 | Month | 14 | Day |
Anticipated trial start date
| 2024 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
Last follow-up date
| 2024 | Year | 10 | Month | 31 | Day |
Date of closure to data entry
Date trial data considered complete
Date analysis concluded
Other
Other related information
Management information
Registered date
| 2024 | Year | 12 | Month | 02 | Day |
Last modified on
| 2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 04 | Day |
Link to view the page
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000064358
