| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000055903 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000063798 |
| Scientific Title | Analyses of the socio-economic values of treatments for chronic constipation |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2024/10/22 |
| Last modified on | 2025/10/22 20:02:13 |
Analyses of the socio-economic values of treatments for chronic constipation
Analyses of the socio-economic values of treatments for chronic constipation
Analyses of the socio-economic values of treatments for chronic constipation
Analyses of the socio-economic values of treatments for chronic constipation
| Japan |
Chronic Constipation
| Gastroenterology |
Others
NO
To determine whether there are differences in the cost-effectiveness of new drugs for chronic constipation, considereing a wide range of socio-economic burdens associated with chronic constipation.
Others
Socio-economic evaluation
To compare socio-economic burdens including treatement costs, productivity loss, and caregiving burden between drugs for chronic constipation
To assess socio-economic burdens by characteristics of patients with chronic constipation
Others,meta-analysis etc
| Not applicable |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
| 1st name | Aki |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Unno |
EA Pharma Co., Ltd.
Medical Dept.
104-0042
1-1, Irifune 2-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo
03-6280-9631
aki_unno@eapharma.co.jp
| 1st name | Katsutoshi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Inagaki |
EA Pharma Co., Ltd.
Medical Dept.
104-0042
1-1, Irifune 2-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo
03-6280-9631
katsutoshi_inagaki@eapharma.co.jp
EA Pharma Co., Ltd.
EA Pharma Co., Ltd.
Profit organization
Japan
Healthcare Consulting Inc.
Mochida Pharmaceutical Plant Co., Ltd.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
NO
| 2024 | Year | 10 | Month | 22 | Day |
Published
https://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12876-025-04334-8
0
Patients treated with elobixibat showed lower total costs and better QoL than those treated with linaclotide and lubiprostone. The deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the base-case results were generally robust to changes in most input parameters but were sensitive to the effectiveness of elobixibat and lubiprostone. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 72.3% and 64.0% of observations showed better QoL for elobixibat 10 mg.
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 22 | Day |
Completed
| 2024 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
| 2024 | Year | 09 | Month | 30 | Day |
| 2024 | Year | 10 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
This study will conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of published papers of clinical trial results, and then use the synthesized values to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis through simulation. Therefore, this study is not subject to ethical review.
| 2024 | Year | 10 | Month | 21 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 10 | Month | 22 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000063798