| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000054685 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000060994 |
| Scientific Title | A Multi-Institutional Prospective Cohort Study of Surgical Treatment of Acquired Lacrimal Duct Obstruction |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2024/07/01 |
| Last modified on | 2025/06/14 13:15:02 |
A Multi-Institutional Prospective Cohort Study of Surgical Treatment of Acquired Lacrimal Duct Obstruction
A Multi-Institutional Prospective Study of Surgery for Acquired Lacrimal Duct Obstruction
A Multi-Institutional Prospective Cohort Study of Surgical Treatment of Acquired Lacrimal Duct Obstruction
A Multi-Institutional Prospective Study of Surgery for Acquired Lacrimal Duct Obstruction
| Japan |
Acquired lacrimal duct obstruction
| Ophthalmology |
Others
NO
Acquired lacrimal duct obstruction and stenosis (referred to as lacrimal duct obstruction (LDO)) are broadly classified into lacrimal puncture and lacrimal canalicular obstruction and stenosis (referred to as lacrimal puncture and lacrimal canalicular obstruction) and lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct obstruction and stenosis (referred to as nasolacrimal duct obstruction). Lacrimal canalicular obstruction can almost always be treated by lacrimal duct recanalization, which uses a lacrimal endoscope to open the obstructed lacrimal duct. On the other hand, the gold standard surgical treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction is dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), in which resection of the maxillary bone or lacrimal bone between the lacrimal sac and nasal cavity, and the lacrimal sac and nasal mucosa are anastomosed. In Japan, however, with the development of nunchaku-type silicone tubes and lacrimal endoscopes, lacrimal duct recanalization for LDO has become more familiar with improved outcomes. In the recent trend toward minimally invasive treatment, lacrimal duct recanalization, which does not require skin or mucosa excision or bone removal, has yet to become popular overseas, even though it is a treatment that meets this need. This is due to various factors such as anatomical structure, treatment outcome, medical insurance system, and healthcare delivery system. Still, it is also thought to be related to the need for more research results showing high evidence. The purpose of this study was to estimate the treatment outcome of endoscopic lacrimal duct recanalization (ELDR) with a certain degree of accuracy by using medical records of examination and treatment of a certain standard prospectively at multiple institutions instead of treatment outcomes reported by a single institution based on the current ununified research subjects and methods. This data will be necessary for future studies comparing the outcomes of ELDR and DCR to determine non-inferiority.
Safety
Exploratory
Not applicable
Anatomical and functional success rates for ELDR and DCR
1 Comparison of surgical success rates by obstruction site
2 Percentage of each treatment selection
3 Patient satisfaction
4 Impact on QOL
5 Comparison of surgical invasiveness
6 Hospitalization period
7 Quantitative evaluation of pre-and postoperative changes in tear fluid volume
8 Ratio of intraoperative and postoperative complications
9 Prevalence of lacrimal drainage system concretions
10 Rate of spontaneous healing in the absence of surgical treatment
11 Adverse events
Observational
| 18 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
1. Patients diagnosed with acquired lacrimal duct obstruction, with symptoms associated with lacrimal duct obstruction such as epiphora, discharge, and blurred vision, and who are willing to undergo surgical treatment. Patients who do not wish to undergo surgical treatment but who give their consent to participate in this study.
2. Patients at least 18 years old and with written consent to participate in this study have been obtained.
1. Patients with stenosis of the lacrimal punctum alone
2. Patients with endoscopic lacrimal duct intubation to prevent lacrimal duct obstruction caused by anticancer drugs
3. Patients with lacrimal duct obstruction caused by the tumor
4. Patients whose tear flow symptoms are thought to be caused by secretory tear flow, such as eyelid disease or keratoconjunctival disease, or by conductive tear flow other than lacrimal duct obstruction, or who are difficult to distinguish from other types of tear flow
5. Patients with congenital malformation syndrome, developmental delay, or congenital facial dysplasia
6. Other patients who are deemed by the physician in charge to be difficult to participate in the study
300
| 1st name | Tomoyuki |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Kamao |
Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Ophthalmology & Regenerative Medicine
791-0295
454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime
089-960-5361
t-kamao@m.ehime-u.ac.jp
| 1st name | Tomoyuki |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Kamao |
Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Ophthalmology & Regenerative Medicine
791-0295
454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime
089-960-5361
t-kamao@m.ehime-u.ac.jp
Ehime University
None
Other
nstitutional Review Board,Ehime University Hospital
454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime
089-960-5172
rinri@m.ehime-u.ac.jp
NO
愛媛大学医学部附属病院(愛媛県)、筑波大学附属病院(茨城県)、兵庫県立尼崎総合医療センター(兵庫県)、多根記念眼科病院(大阪府)、鶴丸眼科(福岡県)、聖マリアンナ医科大学病院(神奈川県)
| 2024 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
Unpublished
Open public recruiting
| 2023 | Year | 12 | Month | 07 | Day |
| 2024 | Year | 01 | Month | 12 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2028 | Year | 11 | Month | 30 | Day |
Study design: cohort study
Method of recruitment: all patients who visited the participating facilities in 2024-2025 and met the selection criteria.
Measurements: patient background, interview, quality of life assessment, visual examination, slit-lamp microscopy, anterior segment OCT, palpation, Schirmer test, lacrimal irrigation test, CT, MRI, lacrimal and nasal endoscopy, surgical records, adverse events
| 2024 | Year | 06 | Month | 17 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 06 | Month | 14 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000060994