UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000052972
Receipt number R000060412
Scientific Title A systematic review on the suppression of postprandial blood glucose elevation by Salacia-derived salacinol (updated version)
Date of disclosure of the study information 2023/12/01
Last modified on 2024/12/02 13:49:03

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

A systematic review on the suppression of postprandial blood glucose elevation by Salacia-derived salacinol (updated version)

Acronym

A systematic review of Salacia-derived salacinol (updated version)

Scientific Title

A systematic review on the suppression of postprandial blood glucose elevation by Salacia-derived salacinol (updated version)

Scientific Title:Acronym

A systematic review of Salacia-derived salacinol (updated version)

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Healthy adult volunteers with a fasting blood glucose level in the normal range or the boundary range (less than 126 mg/dL) are included. Those who are planning to become pregnant, expectant or nursing mothers, and breastfeeding women are excluded.

Classification by specialty

Adult

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The object of this review is to evaluate the suppressive effect on the postprandial hyperglycemia of food containing Salacia-derived salacinol based on literature information in accordance with the "Guidelines on Notification of Foods with Functional Claims" issued from Consumer Affairs Agency.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

The primary outcome will measure the effect on blood glucose levels after eating carbohydrates or carbohydrate-containing meals. Specifically, the postprandial blood glucose level and the area under the blood glucose curve (AUC) of postprandial blood glucose. Both outcomes will be evaluated comprehensively.

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Others,meta-analysis etc


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

18 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

Systematic literature search will be performed using databases for scientific articles, clinical trials, and systematic reviews, as well as handsearching. Inclusion criteria as follows:
Participants (P): Healthy adult volunteers with a fasting blood glucose level in the normal range or the boundary range (less than 126 mg/dL) are included. Those who are planning to become pregnant, expectant or nursing mothers, and breastfeeding women are excluded.
Intervention (I): Intake the foods (tablets, granules, beverages, processed foods) containing Salacia-derived salacinol. The lower limit of Salacia-derived salacinol is 0.02 mg/dose.
Comparison (C): Intake the foods not containing Salacia-derived salacinol.
Outcome (O): The primary outcome will measure the effect on blood glucose levels after eating carbohydrates or carbohydrate-containing meals. Specifically, the postprandial blood glucose level and the area under the blood glucose curve (AUC). Both outcomes will be evaluated comprehensively.
Study design (S): Adopt randomized, quasi-randomized, and non-randomized controlled trials (parallel-group or crossover trials).

Key exclusion criteria

Studies that do not meet the inclusion criteria, such as intervention trials without a placebo group, are excluded.

Target sample size

100


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Akifumi (Reviewer C)
Middle name
Last name Nagatomo

Organization

Morishita Jintan Co.,Ltd.

Division name

Business Management Headquarters, Research and Development Department

Zip code

573-0128

Address

11-1, Tsudayamate 2-Chome, Hirakata-City, Osaka, Japan

TEL

072-800-1044

Email

a-nagatomo@jintan.co.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Koji
Middle name
Last name Kimura

Organization

Association for Salacia Promotion

Division name

Office

Zip code

103-0014

Address

1-38-12, Nihonbashi-kakigaracho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan

TEL

03-5642-3700

Homepage URL

http://www.salacia-association.jp/index.html

Email

salacia.office@fast.or.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Association for Salacia Promotion

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Association for Salacia Promotion

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor

Review team
Mr. Kenji Ikeda (reviewer A), Fujifilm Corporation
Dr. Eriko Kishino (reviewer D), Tokyo Metropolitan Technology Research Institute
Ms. Ruka Yugawa (reviewer B), Morishita Jintan Co.,Ltd.

Research Collaborator
Professor Hiroharu Kamioka (HK), Tokyo University of Agriculture
Ms. Mari Makishi (MM), Toho University, Librarian
Ms. Satoko Sayama (SS), Librarian

Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

N/A

Address

N/A

Tel

-

Email

-


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2023 Year 12 Month 01 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

https://www.salacia-association.jp/index.html

Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2023 Year 11 Month 29 Day

Date of IRB

2023 Year 11 Month 29 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2023 Year 12 Month 04 Day

Last follow-up date

2024 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

(Searches)
The search strategy will be developed by MM (librarian), an external collaborator skilled in clinical research searches and with extensive experience in search tasks in systematic reviews, and will be peer reviewed by SS, also a librarian. MM will search the scientific article and clinical study databases from the beginning of each database to the date of the search.

(Studies extraction)
Based on PICOS, independent screening will be performed by reviewers A and B. If there is a discrepancy, the result will be decided through discussion, but if it is difficult to make a decision, reviewer C will make a decision.
Reviewers C and D will independently extract data with outcome from the selected studies. Disagreement and uncertainties will be resolved by discussion with another reviewer. If the data in the selected studies is unclear or missing, the principal investigator C will confirm with the corresponding author by e-mail.

(Risk of bias assessment)
Evaluation of the validity and reliability of the selected studies was conducted independently by reviewers A and B for each of the items "risk of bias", "indirectness", "imprecision", "inconsistency", and "publication bias". The degree of matching and the Kappa coefficient will be calculated.

(Meta-analysis)
Only when we will not find heterogeneity in randomized controlled trials and confirm no missing data, reviewer C will conduct a meta-analysis by using EZR 1.61.

(Certainty assessment)
Regarding the certainty of the evidence, RoB, indirectness, imprecision, inconsistency, and the publication bias will be rated as "Low (0)", "Medium (-1)", and "High (-2)", respectively. If the sum of each item will be 0 or -1, then the certainly of evidence for an outcome will be evaluated as "High", -2~-4 as "Moderate", -5~-7 as "Low", and -8 or less as "Very Low".


Management information

Registered date

2023 Year 12 Month 01 Day

Last modified on

2024 Year 12 Month 02 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000060412