UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000051745
Receipt number R000059058
Scientific Title TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CENTESIMAL VERSUS FIFTY-MILLESIMAL SCALE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TYPE-2 DIABETES MELLITUS
Date of disclosure of the study information 2023/07/29
Last modified on 2024/02/10 23:27:14

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CENTESIMAL VERSUS FIFTY-MILLESIMAL SCALE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TYPE-2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Acronym

TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CENTESIMAL VERSUS FIFTY-MILLESIMAL SCALE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TYPE-2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Scientific Title

TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CENTESIMAL VERSUS FIFTY-MILLESIMAL SCALE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TYPE-2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Scientific Title:Acronym

TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CENTESIMAL VERSUS FIFTY-MILLESIMAL SCALE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TYPE-2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Region

Asia(except Japan)


Condition

Condition

TYPE-2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Classification by specialty

Endocrinology and Metabolism

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CENTISIMAL VERSUS FIFTY-MILLESIMAL SCALE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TYPE-2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Basic objectives2

Others

Basic objectives -Others

1. To find out the most effective Individualized Homoeopathic Medicines in cases of T2DM patients
2. To find out the most suitable scale and potency in each individual case.
3. To assess the improvement in quality of life by using SF36 Questionnaire

Trial characteristics_1

Exploratory

Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

According to Random Blood Sugar (RBS) levels compared at baseline and at the end of the study i.e., after 1 year in Group A (centesimal group), out of 30 patients, only 14 patients showed RBS levels within the normal range, 13 patients above the normal range, and 3 cases were dropped out, whereas, in Group B (fifty millesimal group), 22 patients showed RBS levels within normal range and only 6 patients above normal range and 3 cases were dropped out. Unpaired t-test was applied and p-value =0.0009 was obtained. Since the p-value < 0.05, the average of Group B's population is considered to be not equal to the average of Group-A's population. In other words, there is a statistically significant difference between RBS values in two treatment groups i.e., the Centesimal group and Fifty millesimal group. Fifty millesimal group (Group B) is effective in the treatment of Type II Diabetes Mellitus as compared to the Centesimal group (Group A).

Key secondary outcomes

Out of 60 patients, the most commonly indicated homoeopathic similimum medicine was Sulphur, Calcarea carbonica and Thuja occidentalis. In group A, most commonly indicated potency was 200 Centesimal, and in group B, in 50 percent of cases up to second fifty millesimal potency was most commonly indicated. The SF-36 questionnaire showed subjective improvement in all the domains after treatment in both groups. Group B (fifty millesimal group) was found to be more effective than Group A (centesimal group).


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Parallel

Randomization

Randomized

Randomization unit

Individual

Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Active

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

2

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Medicine Food Behavior,custom

Interventions/Control_1

Homoeopathic centesimal scale potency. Duration, amount, and frequency of intervention were based upon the severity of symptoms, susceptibility of the patient, and miasmatic background of the individual patient. The route of administration was oral.

Interventions/Control_2

Homoeopathic fifty millesimal scale potency. Duration, amount, and frequency of intervention were based upon the severity of symptoms, susceptibility of the patient, and miasmatic background of the individual patient. The route of administration was oral.

Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

30 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

70 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

Diagnosed and stable cases of Type II Diabetes Mellitus under conventional treatment with Random Blood Sugar concentration more than 200 mg/dl, or Fasting plasma glucose more than 100 mg/dl, or HbA1C more than or equal to 6.5%.

Key exclusion criteria

TYPE 1 DM patients. TYPE 2 DM Patients suffering from any life-threatening illness and complicated diabetes mellitus. Patients who are terminally ill, under immunosuppressive treatment, or self-reported immunocompromised state. Patients of malignancy. Patients who were too sick for consultation. Diagnosed case of mental illness / psychiatric/ other uncontrolled/a life-threatening illness affecting the quality of life/any organ failure. Patients who were unable to comply with the study protocol (including psychiatric diseases). Pregnant ladies. Substance abuse and or dependence.

Target sample size

60


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Dr PRIYANKA
Middle name
Last name MANGOTRA

Organization

NEHRU HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL

Division name

DEPARTMENT OF HOMOEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY AND ORGANON OF MEDICINE

Zip code

110024

Address

B BLOCK, DEFENCE COLONY, NEW DELHI, INDIA

TEL

7053083483

Email

primangotra29@gmail.com


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Dr PRIYANKA
Middle name
Last name MANGOTRA

Organization

NEHRU HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL

Division name

DEPARTMENT OF HOMOEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY AND ORGANON OF MEDICINE

Zip code

110024

Address

B BLOCK, DEFENCE COLONY, NEW DELHI, INDIA

TEL

7053083483

Homepage URL


Email

primangotra29@gmail.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

NEHRU HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

NIL

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

NEHRU HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL

Address

B- BLOCK, DEFENCE COLONY, NEW DELHI, INDIA- 110024

Tel

+911124334225

Email

principalnhmc@gmail.com


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

NEHRU HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL(NEW DELHI)


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2023 Year 07 Month 29 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

60

Results

An unpaired t test was applied inter-group RBS levels to compare the effectiveness between the two groups. The p-value equals to 0.00045 was obtained, since the p-value < 0.05, result is significant. Thus, null hypothesis is rejected. Fifty millesimal group (Group B) was found to be effective against Type II Diabetes Mellitus as compared to the Centesimal group (Group A).

Results date posted

2023 Year 07 Month 29 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events

NO SUCH ADVERSE EFFECTS WERE RECORDED.

Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2022 Year 01 Month 25 Day

Date of IRB

2022 Year 01 Month 25 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2022 Year 02 Month 12 Day

Last follow-up date

2023 Year 02 Month 12 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2023 Year 02 Month 28 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2023 Year 02 Month 28 Day

Date analysis concluded

2023 Year 04 Month 01 Day


Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2023 Year 07 Month 29 Day

Last modified on

2024 Year 02 Month 10 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000059058