Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000051532 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000058795 |
Scientific Title | Effects of Self-Stretching Techniques on Posterior Shoulder Tightness in Baseball Players: Comparison of Sleeper Stretch and Cross Body Stretch in a Randomized Controlled Trial |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2023/07/05 |
Last modified on | 2025/01/14 10:04:39 |
Effects of Self-Stretching Techniques on Posterior Shoulder Tightness in Baseball Players: Comparison of Sleeper Stretch and Cross Body Stretch in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Effects of Self-Stretching Techniques on Posterior Shoulder Tightness in Baseball Players: Comparison of Sleeper Stretch and Cross Body Stretch in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Effects of Self-Stretching Techniques on Posterior Shoulder Tightness in Baseball Players: Comparison of Sleeper Stretch and Cross Body Stretch in a Randomized Controlled Trial
randomized controlled trial
Japan |
Young baseball players
Rehabilitation medicine |
Others
NO
There are two types of stretching: static stretching and dynamic stretching. Static stretching continuously stretches the muscles, making the stretch reflex less likely to occur. This property is recognized as effective in improving soft tissue extensibility and recovery from fatigue. Self-stretching is a convenient means of daily life, and the Cross Body Stretch (hereafter CS method) and Sleeper Stretch (hereafter SS method) are used in overhead sports as a form of self-stretching for PST. Previous studies have shown that both CS and SS are effective in improving the range of motion of internal rotation of the shoulder joint, and some have compared CS and SS and found CS to be more effective in improving the range of motion of internal rotation of the shoulder joint. However, there are few reports that have verified the effectiveness of the CS method on elementary and junior high school students, and the effectiveness of the CS method remains unclear at this age group, when pitching disorders are most important. Therefore, this study examines the effectiveness of the CS and SS stretching methods on elementary and junior high school students.
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Explanatory
Phase I
The overall evaluation procedure is as follows: (1) the full range of internal and external rotation of the shoulder joint (total arc) and (2) the range of motion (ROM) of horizontal internal rotation.
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -but assessor(s) are blinded
Dose comparison
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
2
Treatment
Maneuver | Other |
Sleeper Stretch
Sleeper Stretch And Cross Body Stretch
6 | years-old | <= |
16 | years-old | > |
Male and Female
For elementary and junior high school baseball team members who were able to cooperate in participating in the study among players of softball teams
(1) have a history of shoulder surgery, (2) have had shoulder symptoms requiring medical care within the past year, or (3) have shoulder pain of at least 5 out of 10 using a pain numerical scale.
30
1st name | Kawakami |
Middle name | |
Last name | Junichi |
Kyushu Nutrition Welfare University
Faculty of Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Therapy
800-0252
1-5-1 Kuzuhara Takamatsu, Kokura Minami-ku, Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka
093-471-7912
japangk12@gmail.com
1st name | Junichi |
Middle name | |
Last name | Kawakami |
Kyushu Nutrition Welfare University
Faculty of Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Therapy
800-0252
1-5-1 Kuzuhara Takamatsu, Kokura Minami-ku, Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka
093-471-7912
japangk12@gmail.com
Kyushu Nutrition Welfare University
Noting
Self funding
Kyushu Nutrition Welfare University
1-5-1, Kuzuhara Takamatsu, Kokura Minami-ku, Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka 800-0252
093-681-8651
japangk12@gmail.com
NO
2023 | Year | 07 | Month | 05 | Day |
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000058795
Unpublished
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000058795
24
Significant differences in within-group comparisons before and after the intervention were observed in internal rotation for both groups, total range of motion in the Combined intervention group, and horizontal adduction for both groups. On the other hand, no significant differences were found in external rotation or the total range of motion in the Single intervention group.
2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 14 | Day |
This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the intervention effects of two types of stretching on youth and adolescent baseball pitchers. Participant selection and data collection were conducted at the baseball field where the players practiced, prior to the start of practice sessions, in July 2023. Both the participants and their guardians were provided with detailed written and verbal explanations regarding the purpose, methods, and potential risks of the study. Consent forms were obtained after ensuring that the participants' rights were adequately explained and protected.
This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the intervention effects of two types of stretching on youth and adolescent baseball pitchers. Participant selection and data collection were conducted at the baseball field where the players practiced, prior to the start of practice sessions, in July 2023. Both the participants and their guardians were provided with detailed written and verbal explanations regarding the purpose, methods, and potential risks of the study. Consent forms were obtained after ensuring that the participants' rights were adequately explained and protected.
Nithing
Internal Rotation, External Rotation, Total Arc, Horizontal adduction
Preinitiation
2023 | Year | 07 | Month | 05 | Day |
2023 | Year | 07 | Month | 08 | Day |
2023 | Year | 07 | Month | 22 | Day |
2023 | Year | 07 | Month | 05 | Day |
2025 | Year | 01 | Month | 14 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000058795