UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000050983
Receipt number R000058043
Scientific Title Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) combined with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labour analgesia
Date of disclosure of the study information 2023/05/05
Last modified on 2024/05/17 15:51:45

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) combined with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labour analgesia

Acronym

TEAS combined with PCEA for labour analgesia

Scientific Title

Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) combined with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labour analgesia

Scientific Title:Acronym

TEAS combined with PCEA for labour analgesia

Region

Asia(except Japan)


Condition

Condition

Participants were in the active phase of labour at the time. The inclusion criteria were as follows: the fetus must have reached a gestational age of 37 to 42 weeks; the women must have had a normal pregnancy, with vertex presentation, and must have presented cervical dilatation of 3 to 5 cm, with contractions that had initiated and were regular; the women must have demonstrated the ability to communicate verbally.

Classification by specialty

Obstetrics and Gynecology Anesthesiology Adult

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TEAS combined with PCEA for labour analgesia.

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

The primary outcome of this study was the total volume of anesthetic solution consumed in the PCEA device.

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Parallel

Randomization

Randomized

Randomization unit

Individual

Blinding

Double blind -all involved are blinded

Control

Placebo

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

2

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Device,equipment

Interventions/Control_1

Puerperants were placed in the left-lateral position. The puncture point was between L 3 and L 4. After confirming the puncture was correct, a 4 cm epidural catheter was inserted into the cephalic side. First, 4 mL of 1 % lidocaine was given, then observation was conducted for five minutes to determine whether there was a subarachnoid block or anesthetic toxicity. After excluding abnormality by observation, 8 mL of 0.1 % ropivacaine and 0.5 micrograms / mL sufentanil was injected. After the pain was relieved, the analgesia pump was connected, and 100 mL of 0.1 % ropivacaine and 0.5 micrograms / mL sufentanil was given. The input rate was set to 10 mL / h, and the added dose was 3 mL. The added dose interval was 15 minutes. The TEAS group was carried out during labour using TEAS unit with tetrad channels. Each channel was connected to a pair of electrodes placed at bilatered four points of LI 4 (Hegu), PC 6 (Neiguan), SP 6 (Sanyinjiao), and ST 36 (Zusanli), respectively. The frequency of electronic stimulation was changed from 2 Hz to 100 Hz, and the intensity was adjusted to cause a maximum tolerable buzzing or prickling sensation without muscle contractions in subjects.

Interventions/Control_2

Puerperants were placed in the left-lateral position. The puncture point was between L 3 and L 4. After confirming the puncture was correct, a 4 cm epidural catheter was inserted into the cephalic side. First, 4 mL of 1 % lidocaine was given, then observation was conducted for five minutes to determine whether there was a subarachnoid block or anesthetic toxicity. After excluding abnormality by observation, 8 mL of 0.1 % ropivacaine and 0.5 micrograms / mL sufentanil was injected. After the pain was relieved, the analgesia pump was connected, and 100 mL of 0.1 % ropivacaine and 0.5 micrograms / mL sufentanil was given. The input rate was set to 10 mL / h, and the added dose was 3 mL. The added dose interval was 15 minutes. Parturients in the TENS placebo group were also connected to the device, but no electrical stimulation was applied.

Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

18 years-old <

Age-upper limit

40 years-old >

Gender

Female

Key inclusion criteria

Recruited for this study were nulliparous parturients with healthy singleton pregnancies, gestational age >37 weeks, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status II spontaneous onset of labor, no previous poor obstetrical outcome, no experience of pain relief by systemic or epidural anesthesia in a previous delivery, no experience in acupuncture or TEAS for other reasons,active phase of labor with cervical dilation of 3 cm, and painful contractions requiring labor epidural analgesia.

Key exclusion criteria

Patients were excluded if they: (1) had the history of experimental drug allergy; (2) had been diagnosed with other diseases such as preoperative presence of maternal mental, neurological diseases, affecting evaluation of pains and disease conditions; (3) had combined with gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, gestational thyroid diseases; (4) had taken analgesic drugs or with a history of long-term use of analgesic drugs; (5) had used diazepam, piperazine hydrochloride or other sedative, analgesic drugs in the stages of labor; (6 ) were overweight or low pregnancy weight,body mass index < 18.5 or > 25; (7) were not agree to receive painless labor and not sign the informed consent from; (8) fetal compromise; (9) maternal cutaneous lesions on the application sites such as wound scars, urticaria or insect bites; (10) candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean section; and (11) pacemaker users; (12) absolute contraindications or relative contraindications to spinal anesthesia.

Target sample size

70


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name jie
Middle name
Last name Chen

Organization

People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District

Division name

Department of Anaesthesiology

Zip code

401320

Address

Yunan Avenue 659, Longzhouwan Street, Banan District, Chongqing, China

TEL

+81-086-23-66234145

Email

cjandsh@tmmu.edu.cn


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name jie
Middle name
Last name Chen

Organization

People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District

Division name

Department of Anaesthesiology

Zip code

401320

Address

Yunan Avenue 659, Longzhouwan Street, Banan District, Chongqing, China

TEL

+81-086-23-66234145

Homepage URL


Email

cjandsh@tmmu.edu.cn


Sponsor or person

Institute

Department of Anaesthesiology, People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Chongqing health commission, Chongqing science and technology commission, and People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Local Government

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Ethics Committee of the People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District

Address

Yunan Avenue 659, Longzhouwan Street, Banan District, Chongqing 401320, P.R China

Tel

+81-086-23-66291798

Email

409560509@qq.com


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2023 Year 05 Month 05 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000058043

Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications

https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000058043

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

70

Results

N.A.

Results date posted

2024 Year 05 Month 09 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics

N.A.

Participant flow

N.A.

Adverse events

N.A.

Outcome measures

N.A.

Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Enrolling by invitation

Date of protocol fixation

2021 Year 04 Month 20 Day

Date of IRB

2021 Year 04 Month 20 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2023 Year 05 Month 08 Day

Last follow-up date

2023 Year 05 Month 08 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2023 Year 05 Month 03 Day

Last modified on

2024 Year 05 Month 17 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000058043