Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000049890 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000056705 |
Scientific Title | Prospective observational study to evaluate the utility of functional assessment scoring in patients with unresectable or advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2022/12/26 |
Last modified on | 2024/06/25 13:23:09 |
Prospective observational study to evaluate the utility of functional assessment scoring in patients with unresectable or advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer
Prospective observational study to evaluate the utility of functional assessment scoring in patients with unresectable or advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer
Prospective observational study to evaluate the utility of functional assessment scoring in patients with unresectable or advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer
Prospective observational study to evaluate the utility of functional assessment scoring in patients with unresectable or advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer
Japan |
unresectable or advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer
Hepato-biliary-pancreatic medicine |
Malignancy
YES
The purpose of the study is to clarify the functional assessment scoring and regimen selection status of patients with unresectable or advanced recurrent pancreatic cancer, and to examine the relationship between functional assessment scoring and treatment efficacy and tolerability, and possible prognostic factors.
Others
We will also analyze the relationship between the scoring and previously reported prognostic factors such as Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR).
Functional assessment scoring and regimen selection, association with tolerability, and possible prognostic factors
Association of inflammatory and immune markers and body composition assessment with prognosis
Observational
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
1) Patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer who have been diagnosed as pancreatic cancer based on histological, imaging or clinical findings.
2) Patients who have been fully informed about the study and have given their written consent.
1) Patients who are deemed by the treating doctor to be unsuitable for enrollment in this study.
2) Patients with pathologically diagnosed neuroendocrine tumor.
100
1st name | Tomohiro |
Middle name | |
Last name | Nishina |
National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
7910280
160 Kou, Minami-umemoto, Matsuyama, Ehime
0899991111
nishina.tomohiro.nj@mail.hosp.go.jp
1st name | Kaori |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hino |
National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
7910280
160 Kou, Minami-umemoto, Matsuyama, Ehime
0899991111
hino.kaori.mw@mail.hosp.go.jp
National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
None
Other
Ehime University Hospital, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital
National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
160 Kou, Minami-umemoto, Matsuyama, Ehime
0899991111
hino.kaori.mw@mail.hosp.go.jp
NO
独立行政法人国立病院機構四国がんセンター(愛媛県)、愛媛大学医学部附属病院(愛媛県)、松山赤十字病院(愛媛県)、愛媛県立中央病院(愛媛県)
2022 | Year | 12 | Month | 26 | Day |
Unpublished
No longer recruiting
2022 | Year | 02 | Month | 07 | Day |
2022 | Year | 03 | Month | 15 | Day |
2022 | Year | 03 | Month | 17 | Day |
2024 | Year | 03 | Month | 30 | Day |
1. Pre-treatment evaluation
1) Sex, age (at diagnosis), height, weight
2) Family history of cancer
3) Cancer history, treatment history, and underlying disease
4) Stage of cancer, presence or absence of primary tumor resection, date of primary tumor resection, presence or absence of perioperative chemotherapy (if yes, treatment history)
5) Pathological histology
6) Site of metastasis (presence or absence of distant metastasis, lymph node, liver, lung, bone, peritoneum, other)
7) Presence or absence of target lesions in RECIST version 1.1
8) Degree of ascites accumulation (none, small volume, moderate volume, severe)
Small volume: confined to pelvic cavity/upper abdomen.
Moderate volume: other than small volume and severe ascites.
Severe: continuous from the pelvic region to the upper abdomen.
9) Biliary drainage
10) Body composition evaluation
Psoas muscle mass index (PMI)
Psoas index (PI)
2. Regimen-specific survey
1) Regimen content and treatment line
2) Reason for regimen selection
3) Degree of ascites accumulation (none, small, moderate, severe)
4) UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms if modified FOLFIRINOX or nal-IRI therapy is selected
5) ECOG PS before starting therapy, PS at discontinuation of therapy, weight, date of starting therapy, presence of exacerbation, date of exacerbation, date of discontinuation, reason for discontinuation of therapy (PD, adverse events, etc.), effect of tumor reduction
6) Dose, etc
7) Grade 3 or higher toxicity in CTCAE ver5.0
8) Presence or absence of biliary drainage
9) Blood tests at start and discontinuation of therapy (neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, mononuclear cell count, platelet count, albumin, AST, ALT, T-bil, Cre, CRP, CEA, CA19-9)
10) Functional assessment at the beginning and discontinuation of therapy: G8 and EQ-5D-5L investigations.
3. Genetic testing
BRACAnalysis, MSI status
4. Outcome
Date of last confirmed alive, date of death, cause of death
2022 | Year | 12 | Month | 24 | Day |
2024 | Year | 06 | Month | 25 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000056705