UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000049622
Receipt number R000056272
Scientific Title Evaluation of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.
Date of disclosure of the study information 2022/11/28
Last modified on 2026/09/12 07:04:44

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Evaluation of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Acronym

Evaluation of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Scientific Title

Evaluation of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Scientific Title:Acronym

Evaluation of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Acute renal failure

Classification by specialty

Emergency medicine Intensive care medicine Rehabilitation medicine
Adult

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To examine the effects of early neuromuscular electrical stimulation on quantitative and qualitative changes in muscle, physical function and physical, mental and cognitive function after discharge from hospital in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

Quadriceps muscle thickness

Key secondary outcomes

Medical Research Council sum score, Functional Status Score for the ICU, handgrip strength, Short Physical Performance Battery, and Barthel Index.


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Parallel

Randomization

Randomized

Randomization unit

Individual

Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Active

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

2

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Device,equipment

Interventions/Control_1

Participants assigned to the NMES group received protocol-based early mobilization and rehabilitation plus bilateral lower-limb NMES for 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week, until ICU discharge.

Interventions/Control_2

Participants assigned to the control group received protocol-based early mobilization and rehabilitation without NMES or sham stimulation.

Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

Patients admitted to ICU and receiving continuous renal replacement therapy

Key exclusion criteria

(i) Difficulty in standing prior to ICU admission.
(ii) Use of intra-aortic balloon pumping
(iii) Circulatory support by percutaneous cardiopulmonary support
(iv) Pacemaker placement (NMES group only) (v) Skin injury at the electrode site (NMES group only)
(5) Skin injury at the electrode site (NMES group only)
(vi) Presence of deep vein thrombosis (NMES group only)
(vii) Other patients deemed unsuitable as research subjects by the principal investigator.

Target sample size

40


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Tadayoshi
Middle name
Last name Nonoyama

Organization

University of Fukui Hospital

Division name

Department of Rehabilitation

Zip code

9101193

Address

23-3, Matsuoka-Shimogozuki, Eiheiji-machi, Yoshida-gun, Fukui.

TEL

0776-61-3111

Email

nonoyama@u-fukui.ac.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Tadayoshi
Middle name
Last name Nonoyama

Organization

University of Fukui Hospital

Division name

Department of Rehabilitation

Zip code

9101193

Address

23-3, Matsuoka-Shimogozuki, Eiheiji-machi, Yoshida-gun, Fukui.

TEL

0776-61-3111

Homepage URL


Email

nonoyama@u-fukui.ac.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

University of Fukui Hospital

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Japanese Society of Physical Therapy

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

University of Fukui Hospital

Address

23-3, Matsuoka-Shimogozuki, Eiheiji-machi, Yoshida-gun, Fukui.

Tel

0776-61-3111

Email

nonoyama@u-fukui.ac.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2022 Year 11 Month 28 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

The protocol is not publicly available.

Publication of results

Published


Result

URL related to results and publications

No publicly accessible results URL is available.

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

22

Results

Twenty-two participants were randomized (Control, 12; NMES, 10). Mean rectus femoris thickness change from baseline to Day 7 was -15.6% in Control (n=9) and -11.3% in NMES (n=10). The mean difference (NMES minus Control) was 4.3 percentage points (95% CI, -5.7 to 14.3; P=0.373). Nine participants received NMES, and no NMES-related adverse events occurred. Other adverse events were not systematically collected.

Results date posted

2026 Year 09 Month 12 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics

Twenty-two participants were randomized, but baseline data were available for 21 participants (Control, n=11; NMES, n=10) because one Control participant had no individual analytic record.

Overall, mean age was 72.9 years (SD 12.1), 17/21 participants (81.0%) were male, mean height was 160.7 cm (SD 10.6), mean admission body weight was 62.6 kg (SD 17.0), 8/21 (38.1%) had surgical admissions, mean APACHE II score was 20.7 (SD 4.1), mean Clinical Frailty Scale was 2.8 (SD 2.1; n=15), 7/21 (33.3%) received hemodialysis before admission, mean SOFA score was 9.5 (SD 2.4), and 11/21 (52.4%) received mechanical ventilation.

In Control, mean age was 71.8 years (SD 12.8), 9/11 (81.8%) were male, mean height was 160.1 cm (SD 10.7), mean admission body weight was 61.0 kg (SD 22.7), 3/11 (27.3%) had surgical admissions, mean APACHE II score was 21.8 (SD 3.5), mean Clinical Frailty Scale was 2.1 (SD 1.2; n=7), 4/11 (36.4%) received hemodialysis before admission, mean SOFA score was 9.7 (SD 2.5), and 6/11 (54.5%) received mechanical ventilation.

In NMES, mean age was 74.1 years (SD 11.8), 8/10 (80.0%) were male, mean height was 161.3 cm (SD 11.0), mean admission body weight was 64.2 kg (SD 8.1), 5/10 (50.0%) had surgical admissions, mean APACHE II score was 19.4 (SD 4.5), mean Clinical Frailty Scale was 3.4 (SD 2.6; n=8), 3/10 (30.0%) received hemodialysis before admission, mean SOFA score was 9.3 (SD 2.4), and 5/10 (50.0%) received mechanical ventilation.

Participant flow

Seventy-two patients were assessed for eligibility, and 50 were excluded: CRRT for less than 48 hours (n=11), inability to stand before admission (n=10), IABP or mechanical circulatory support (n=3), pacemaker (n=3), skin injury at an electrode site (n=1), deep vein thrombosis (n=1), declined consent (n=8), DNAR order (n=7), and other reasons (n=6).

Twenty-two participants were randomized to Control (n=12) or NMES (n=10). Nine NMES-assigned participants received NMES; one did not receive NMES because of clinical deterioration after enrollment.

The Day 7 primary analysis included 9 Control and 10 NMES participants. Three Control participants were unavailable because of no baseline measurement (n=1), no Day 7 measurement after death (n=1), or ICU death with no individual analytic record (n=1). Hospital-discharge muscle-thickness measurements were available for 8 Control and 8 NMES participants. The exploratory late-assessment analysis included 9 Control participants, including one last pre-death measurement, and 8 NMES participants. Missing values were not imputed.

Adverse events

Nine of 10 NMES-assigned participants received NMES, and no NMES-related adverse events occurred among the recipients (0/9). ICU death occurred in 3/12 Control participants (25.0%) and 2/10 NMES participants (20.0%). Other adverse events not temporally associated with NMES were not systematically collected as trial outcomes; therefore, a comprehensive between-group safety comparison was not performed.

Outcome measures

Analyses were performed using available cases without imputation. Values are means with SDs, and between-group differences are NMES minus Control.

Primary outcome: Rectus femoris thickness change from baseline to Day 7 was -15.6% (SD 11.0; n=9) in Control and -11.3% (SD 9.2; n=10) in NMES. The mean difference was 4.3 percentage points (95% CI, -5.7 to 14.3; P=0.373).

Exploratory late assessment: Rectus femoris thickness change was -27.3% (SD 8.9; n=9) in Control and -13.9% (SD 9.8; n=8) in NMES. The mean difference was 13.4 percentage points (95% CI, 3.7 to 23.1; P=0.010). This finding was exploratory because assessment timing varied and the Control group included one last pre-death measurement.

Secondary outcomes:
MRC sum score at ICU discharge was 50.4 (SD 9.0; n=8) in Control and 52.7 (SD 6.1; n=9) in NMES; difference 2.3 (95% CI, -5.9 to 10.5; P=0.555).
FSS-ICU at ICU discharge was 19.0 (SD 12.3; n=10) and 20.1 (SD 9.6; n=9); difference 1.1 (95% CI, -9.5 to 11.8; P=0.828).
Handgrip strength at ICU discharge was 12.7 kgf (SD 4.2; n=7) and 17.3 kgf (SD 6.7; n=9); difference 4.6 kgf (95% CI, -1.3 to 10.5; P=0.114).
Barthel Index at ICU discharge was 21.7 (SD 23.7; n=9) and 18.8 (SD 11.3; n=8); difference -2.9 (95% CI, -22.3 to 16.4; P=0.748).
MRC sum score at hospital discharge was 56.0 (SD 3.1; n=5) and 55.1 (SD 5.0; n=7); difference -0.9 (95% CI, -6.1 to 4.4; P=0.722).
Handgrip strength at hospital discharge was 16.1 kgf (SD 4.4; n=5) and 22.3 kgf (SD 7.8; n=6); difference 6.2 kgf (95% CI, -2.4 to 14.8; P=0.136).
SPPB at hospital discharge was 5.2 (SD 4.1; n=6) and 8.7 (SD 4.1; n=7); difference 3.5 (95% CI, -1.5 to 8.6; P=0.148).
Barthel Index at hospital discharge was 75.0 (SD 17.6; n=6) and 70.6 (SD 31.2; n=8); difference -4.4 (95% CI, -33.3 to 24.5; P=0.746).
Three-month Barthel Index was 92.5 (SD 15.0; n=4) in Control and 93.3 (SD 12.1; n=6) in NMES. No inferential comparison was performed because follow-up was sparse.
ICU-discharge SPPB and hospital-discharge FSS-ICU data were unavailable.

Plan to share IPD

No

IPD sharing Plan description

The deidentified individual participant data generated and analyzed during this study will not be shared.


Progress

Recruitment status

Terminated

Date of protocol fixation

2022 Year 11 Month 26 Day

Date of IRB

2022 Year 12 Month 06 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2023 Year 02 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2025 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

Recruitment was discontinued after 22 of the planned 40 participants had been enrolled because the principal investigator changed institutions, making further recruitment and follow-up operationally infeasible. The decision was unrelated to treatment effects or safety concerns.


Management information

Registered date

2022 Year 11 Month 27 Day

Last modified on

2026 Year 09 Month 12 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000056272