| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000049622 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000056272 |
| Scientific Title | Evaluation of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy. |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2022/11/28 |
| Last modified on | 2026/09/12 07:04:44 |
Evaluation of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.
Evaluation of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.
Evaluation of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.
Evaluation of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.
| Japan |
Acute renal failure
| Emergency medicine | Intensive care medicine | Rehabilitation medicine |
| Adult |
Others
NO
To examine the effects of early neuromuscular electrical stimulation on quantitative and qualitative changes in muscle, physical function and physical, mental and cognitive function after discharge from hospital in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.
Efficacy
Quadriceps muscle thickness
Medical Research Council sum score, Functional Status Score for the ICU, handgrip strength, Short Physical Performance Battery, and Barthel Index.
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
2
Treatment
| Device,equipment |
Participants assigned to the NMES group received protocol-based early mobilization and rehabilitation plus bilateral lower-limb NMES for 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week, until ICU discharge.
Participants assigned to the control group received protocol-based early mobilization and rehabilitation without NMES or sham stimulation.
| 20 | years-old | <= |
| Not applicable |
Male and Female
Patients admitted to ICU and receiving continuous renal replacement therapy
(i) Difficulty in standing prior to ICU admission.
(ii) Use of intra-aortic balloon pumping
(iii) Circulatory support by percutaneous cardiopulmonary support
(iv) Pacemaker placement (NMES group only) (v) Skin injury at the electrode site (NMES group only)
(5) Skin injury at the electrode site (NMES group only)
(vi) Presence of deep vein thrombosis (NMES group only)
(vii) Other patients deemed unsuitable as research subjects by the principal investigator.
40
| 1st name | Tadayoshi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Nonoyama |
University of Fukui Hospital
Department of Rehabilitation
9101193
23-3, Matsuoka-Shimogozuki, Eiheiji-machi, Yoshida-gun, Fukui.
0776-61-3111
nonoyama@u-fukui.ac.jp
| 1st name | Tadayoshi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Nonoyama |
University of Fukui Hospital
Department of Rehabilitation
9101193
23-3, Matsuoka-Shimogozuki, Eiheiji-machi, Yoshida-gun, Fukui.
0776-61-3111
nonoyama@u-fukui.ac.jp
University of Fukui Hospital
Japanese Society of Physical Therapy
Other
University of Fukui Hospital
23-3, Matsuoka-Shimogozuki, Eiheiji-machi, Yoshida-gun, Fukui.
0776-61-3111
nonoyama@u-fukui.ac.jp
NO
| 2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 28 | Day |
The protocol is not publicly available.
Published
No publicly accessible results URL is available.
22
Twenty-two participants were randomized (Control, 12; NMES, 10). Mean rectus femoris thickness change from baseline to Day 7 was -15.6% in Control (n=9) and -11.3% in NMES (n=10). The mean difference (NMES minus Control) was 4.3 percentage points (95% CI, -5.7 to 14.3; P=0.373). Nine participants received NMES, and no NMES-related adverse events occurred. Other adverse events were not systematically collected.
| 2026 | Year | 09 | Month | 12 | Day |
Twenty-two participants were randomized, but baseline data were available for 21 participants (Control, n=11; NMES, n=10) because one Control participant had no individual analytic record.
Overall, mean age was 72.9 years (SD 12.1), 17/21 participants (81.0%) were male, mean height was 160.7 cm (SD 10.6), mean admission body weight was 62.6 kg (SD 17.0), 8/21 (38.1%) had surgical admissions, mean APACHE II score was 20.7 (SD 4.1), mean Clinical Frailty Scale was 2.8 (SD 2.1; n=15), 7/21 (33.3%) received hemodialysis before admission, mean SOFA score was 9.5 (SD 2.4), and 11/21 (52.4%) received mechanical ventilation.
In Control, mean age was 71.8 years (SD 12.8), 9/11 (81.8%) were male, mean height was 160.1 cm (SD 10.7), mean admission body weight was 61.0 kg (SD 22.7), 3/11 (27.3%) had surgical admissions, mean APACHE II score was 21.8 (SD 3.5), mean Clinical Frailty Scale was 2.1 (SD 1.2; n=7), 4/11 (36.4%) received hemodialysis before admission, mean SOFA score was 9.7 (SD 2.5), and 6/11 (54.5%) received mechanical ventilation.
In NMES, mean age was 74.1 years (SD 11.8), 8/10 (80.0%) were male, mean height was 161.3 cm (SD 11.0), mean admission body weight was 64.2 kg (SD 8.1), 5/10 (50.0%) had surgical admissions, mean APACHE II score was 19.4 (SD 4.5), mean Clinical Frailty Scale was 3.4 (SD 2.6; n=8), 3/10 (30.0%) received hemodialysis before admission, mean SOFA score was 9.3 (SD 2.4), and 5/10 (50.0%) received mechanical ventilation.
Seventy-two patients were assessed for eligibility, and 50 were excluded: CRRT for less than 48 hours (n=11), inability to stand before admission (n=10), IABP or mechanical circulatory support (n=3), pacemaker (n=3), skin injury at an electrode site (n=1), deep vein thrombosis (n=1), declined consent (n=8), DNAR order (n=7), and other reasons (n=6).
Twenty-two participants were randomized to Control (n=12) or NMES (n=10). Nine NMES-assigned participants received NMES; one did not receive NMES because of clinical deterioration after enrollment.
The Day 7 primary analysis included 9 Control and 10 NMES participants. Three Control participants were unavailable because of no baseline measurement (n=1), no Day 7 measurement after death (n=1), or ICU death with no individual analytic record (n=1). Hospital-discharge muscle-thickness measurements were available for 8 Control and 8 NMES participants. The exploratory late-assessment analysis included 9 Control participants, including one last pre-death measurement, and 8 NMES participants. Missing values were not imputed.
Nine of 10 NMES-assigned participants received NMES, and no NMES-related adverse events occurred among the recipients (0/9). ICU death occurred in 3/12 Control participants (25.0%) and 2/10 NMES participants (20.0%). Other adverse events not temporally associated with NMES were not systematically collected as trial outcomes; therefore, a comprehensive between-group safety comparison was not performed.
Analyses were performed using available cases without imputation. Values are means with SDs, and between-group differences are NMES minus Control.
Primary outcome: Rectus femoris thickness change from baseline to Day 7 was -15.6% (SD 11.0; n=9) in Control and -11.3% (SD 9.2; n=10) in NMES. The mean difference was 4.3 percentage points (95% CI, -5.7 to 14.3; P=0.373).
Exploratory late assessment: Rectus femoris thickness change was -27.3% (SD 8.9; n=9) in Control and -13.9% (SD 9.8; n=8) in NMES. The mean difference was 13.4 percentage points (95% CI, 3.7 to 23.1; P=0.010). This finding was exploratory because assessment timing varied and the Control group included one last pre-death measurement.
Secondary outcomes:
MRC sum score at ICU discharge was 50.4 (SD 9.0; n=8) in Control and 52.7 (SD 6.1; n=9) in NMES; difference 2.3 (95% CI, -5.9 to 10.5; P=0.555).
FSS-ICU at ICU discharge was 19.0 (SD 12.3; n=10) and 20.1 (SD 9.6; n=9); difference 1.1 (95% CI, -9.5 to 11.8; P=0.828).
Handgrip strength at ICU discharge was 12.7 kgf (SD 4.2; n=7) and 17.3 kgf (SD 6.7; n=9); difference 4.6 kgf (95% CI, -1.3 to 10.5; P=0.114).
Barthel Index at ICU discharge was 21.7 (SD 23.7; n=9) and 18.8 (SD 11.3; n=8); difference -2.9 (95% CI, -22.3 to 16.4; P=0.748).
MRC sum score at hospital discharge was 56.0 (SD 3.1; n=5) and 55.1 (SD 5.0; n=7); difference -0.9 (95% CI, -6.1 to 4.4; P=0.722).
Handgrip strength at hospital discharge was 16.1 kgf (SD 4.4; n=5) and 22.3 kgf (SD 7.8; n=6); difference 6.2 kgf (95% CI, -2.4 to 14.8; P=0.136).
SPPB at hospital discharge was 5.2 (SD 4.1; n=6) and 8.7 (SD 4.1; n=7); difference 3.5 (95% CI, -1.5 to 8.6; P=0.148).
Barthel Index at hospital discharge was 75.0 (SD 17.6; n=6) and 70.6 (SD 31.2; n=8); difference -4.4 (95% CI, -33.3 to 24.5; P=0.746).
Three-month Barthel Index was 92.5 (SD 15.0; n=4) in Control and 93.3 (SD 12.1; n=6) in NMES. No inferential comparison was performed because follow-up was sparse.
ICU-discharge SPPB and hospital-discharge FSS-ICU data were unavailable.
No
The deidentified individual participant data generated and analyzed during this study will not be shared.
Terminated
| 2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 26 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 12 | Month | 06 | Day |
| 2023 | Year | 02 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
Recruitment was discontinued after 22 of the planned 40 participants had been enrolled because the principal investigator changed institutions, making further recruitment and follow-up operationally infeasible. The decision was unrelated to treatment effects or safety concerns.
| 2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 27 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 09 | Month | 12 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000056272