| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000049304 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000056158 |
| Scientific Title | Randomized Phase II selection trial of Stereotactic Prostate Irradiation with Dose Escalated Region |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2022/11/01 |
| Last modified on | 2026/04/28 09:50:40 |
Randomized Phase II selection trial of Stereotactic Prostate Irradiation with Dose Escalated Region
SPIDER II trial
Randomized Phase II selection trial of Stereotactic Prostate Irradiation with Dose Escalated Region
SPIDER II trial
| Japan |
Prostate cancer
| Urology | Radiology |
Malignancy
NO
The purpose of this study was to compare a local dose escalation technique for the tumor visualized by MRI (group A) with a peripheral dose escalation technique for all prostate parenchyma excluding bladder, urethra, and rectum (group B), and to select the group to be compared with the standard treatment in the future phase III trial.
Bio-equivalence
>=Grade 2 toxicity rates at 1 year after treatment
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Dose comparison
2
Treatment
| Device,equipment |
focal dose escalation
peripheral dose escalation
| 20 | years-old | <= |
| 90 | years-old | >= |
Male
(1) Patients pathologically diagnosed with prostate cancer (adenocarcinoma)
(2) Un-favorite intermediate-, high-, or very-high-risk patients according to the NCCN classification
(3) Patients with PSA level (ng/ml) less than 100
(4) Patients aged between 20 and 90 on the date of informed consent
(5) Performance status (PS) is an ECOG criterion for patients with a score of 0 to 1.
(6) Patients who can detect lesions on T2-weighted or diffusion-weighted MRI
(7) Written consent has been obtained
(1) Patients with active multiple cancers (excluding metachronous multiple cancers with an expected prognosis of 5 years or longer and synchronous multiple cancers with an expected prognosis of 5 years or longer with treatment)
(2) Patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbAlc 8.0% or more as a guideline)
(3) Patients judged by the attending physician to have serious complications such as connective tissue disease, heart disease, respiratory disease, liver disease, etc.
(4) Patients who are complicated by psychosis or psychiatric symptoms and are judged to be difficult to participate in the study
(5) Patients who have previously received radiotherapy to the pelvis
(6) Patients who have undergone surgical therapy for the prostate (transurethral prostatectomy, subcapsular prostatectomy, orchiectomy, etc.) or HIFU (high-intensity focused ultrasound)
(7) Patients who received chemotherapy other than androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer
(8) Patients with inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis
(9) Patients who are judged to be unable to comply with dose restrictions due to the proximity of risk organs such as the urethra and large intestine to the PTV estimated by diagnostic imaging.
(10) Patients who are judged inappropriate for clinical trial participation by the attending physician
60
| 1st name | Hiromichi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Ishiyama |
Kitasato university school of medicine
Department of radiation oncology
252-0329
1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamiharashi-minamiku, Kanagawa, JAPAN
042-778-8111
hishiyam@kitasato-u.ac.jp
| 1st name | Koji |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Inaba |
National cancer center hospital
Department of radiation oncology
104-0045
5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo
03-3545-2511
koinaba@ncc.go.jp
Kitasato univeristy
Kitasato univeristy
Self funding
Kitasato University School of Medicine, Hospital Ethics Committee
1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami Ward, Sagamihara City, Kanagawa, JAPAN
042-778-8111
rinrib@med.kitasato-u.ac.jp
NO
| 2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 01 | Day |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167814025003949?via%3Dihub
Unpublished
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167814025003949?via%3Dihub
66
At a median follow-up of 12 months, the incidence of Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal or genitourinary AEs related to radiotherapy was 7.4% in Group A and 13.5% in Group B (p=0.68) (Acute Grade 2 AEs: 3.7% in Group A and 13.5% in Group B, Late Grade 2 AEs: 3.7% in Group A and 0% in Group B).
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 28 | Day |
Patients who have been pathologically diagnosed with prostate cancer (adenocarcinoma).
Patients classified as unfavorable intermediate risk, high risk, or very high risk according to the NCCN risk classification.
Patients with a PSA level of less than 100 ng/mL
Patients aged 20 years or older and 90 years or younger at the time of informed consent.
Patients with a Performance Status (PS) of 0 to 1 according to the ECOG criteria.
Patients with a detectable lesion on MRI, identified on T2weighted imaging and/or diffusion weighted imaging.
Patients who have provided written informed consent.
After confirming that the eligible patient meets all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, the patient will be registered through the UMIN Medical Research Support (Case Registration and Allocation) System Cloud Version (INDICE Cloud).
At the time of registration, patients will be randomly assigned within INDICE Cloud in a 1 to 1 ratio to either the tumor local dose escalation group (Group A) or the marginal parenchymal dose escalation group (Group B).
In this study, no allocation adjustment factors will be used, and assignment will be performed using a completely random allocation method.
The detailed procedures of the randomization will not be disclosed to the investigators at the participating institutions.
At a median follow-up of 12 months, the incidence of Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal or genitourinary AEs related to radiotherapy was 7.4% in Group A and 13.5% in Group B (p=0.68) (Acute Grade 2 AEs: 3.7% in Group A and 13.5% in Group B, Late Grade 2 AEs: 3.7% in Group A and 0% in Group B).
A total of 28 patients in Group A and 37 in Group B were enrolled, with 27 in Group A and 37 in Group B receiving the protocol treatment. The median age was 75 years in Group A and 76 years in Group B. The median PSA was 9.7 ng/mL (range: 6.1-41.3) in Group A, 10.9 ng/mL (range: 5.6-45.2) in Group B. Group A had 9 patients and Group B had 15 with unfavorable intermediate risk; 14 and 15 patients, respectively, were classified as high risk, and 4 and 7 patients as very high risk. Hormone therapy was administered to 26 patients in Group A and 35 in Group B. At a median follow-up of 12 months, the incidence of Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal or genitourinary AEs related to radiotherapy was 7.4% in Group A and 13.5% in Group B (p=0.68) (Acute Grade 2 AEs: 3.7% in Group A and 13.5% in Group B, Late Grade 2 AEs: 3.7% in Group A and 0% in Group B).
No longer recruiting
| 2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 05 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 20 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 11 | Month | 01 | Day |
| 2025 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
| 2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 25 | Day |
| 2026 | Year | 04 | Month | 28 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000056158