Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000049292 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000056139 |
Scientific Title | Comparative study of C-E and V-E techniques of mask ventilation in obese patients undergoing general anaesthesia |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2022/10/23 |
Last modified on | 2022/10/23 01:32:06 |
Comparative study of C-E and V-E techniques
of mask ventilation in obese patients undergoing general anaesthesia
CE vs VE in MV in obese in GA
Comparative study of C-E and V-E techniques
of mask ventilation in obese patients undergoing general anaesthesia
CE vs VE in MV in obese in GA
Asia(except Japan) |
Completed clinical trial
Anesthesiology |
Others
NO
To compare CE and VE techniques of mask ventilation, expired tidal volumes and peak airway pressures in Obese patient undergoing general Anaesthesia.
Safety,Efficacy
Others
Not applicable
Expired tidal volumes measured during mask ventilation in obese patients undergoing general anaesthesia
1) Peak airway pressures
2) Heart rate
3) Non invasive blood pressures
4) Saturation
5) End tidal carbon dioxide-Qualitative estimation
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Double blind -all involved are blinded
Dose comparison
2
Educational,Counseling,Training
Other |
In obese patients undergoing general anaesthesia, during the apneic period mask ventilation was carried out with the two handed CE technique of mask ventilation for a period of 3 minutes. The expired tidal volumes and peak airway pressures were measured for 12 breaths each minute. If unable to mask ventilate the difficult mask ventilation protocol was initiated and patients excluded from study.
In obese patients undergoing general anaesthesia, during the apneic period mask ventilation was carried out with the VE technique of mask ventilation for a period of 3 minutes. The expired tidal volumes and peak airway pressures were measured for 12 breaths each minute. If unable to mask ventilate the difficult mask ventilation protocol was initiated and patients excluded from study.
18 | years-old | <= |
75 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
o Age group: Above 18-75 years.
o ASA 1/2/3 patients.
o Elective Surgery.
o BMI> 25kg/m2
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
o Obstructive and restrictive airway disease.
o Untreated ischemic heart disease/congestive cardiac failure/cardiomyopathy.
o Emergency surgeries.
28
o ASA 4 and above.
o Patients requiring awake intubation.
o Pregnant ladies
o Difficult airway other than overweight and obesity
62
1st name | Dr Sukanya |
Middle name | |
Last name | S |
Bangalore Medical College and Reserach Institute
Anaesthesiology - post graduate
560002
BMCRI Ladies hostel new tharagupet opposite tippu sultan
9176714319
sukichillz.28@gmail.com
1st name | Sukanya |
Middle name | |
Last name | S |
Bangalore medical college and research institute
Anaesthesiology - post graduate
560002
BMCRI Ladies hostel new tharagupet opposite tippu sultan
9176714319
sukichillz.28@gmail.com
Bangalore Medical College and Reserach Institute
Department of Anaesthesiology
No Funding sources
Self funding
Bangalore medical college and research institute - Institutional Ethics Commitee
BMCRI Ladies hostel new tharagupet opposite tippu sultan
8610173499
sukichillz.28@gmail.com
NO
2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 23 | Day |
https://1drv.ms/w/s!Avf4ls218GMUgwVr051Pc2krUVBy?e=1mrVra
Unpublished
Not published or not presented.
70
The mean expired TV(SD) achieved in V-E technique was 453.88ml + 31.21 and C-E technique was 349.83ml +26.38. The mean PAP(SD) generated in V-E technique was 26.30cmH2O +1.08 and C-E technique was 22.52 cm H2O +1.21. The expired tidal volumes and mean peak airway pressures was statistically significant (p value <0.001) between groups.
2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 23 | Day |
The mean body mass index in C-E technique group was 33.09 kg/m2 versus The mean body mass index in V-E technique group was 34.01 kg/m2.
12 females and 19 males were included in the C-E technique of mask ventilation group. 14 females and 17 males were included in the V-E technique of mask ventilation group.
In our study we took 70 participants, 8 patients were excluded from the C-E technique of mask ventilation due to difficulty in mask ventilation. In the remaining 62 patients 31 patients each underwent CE and VE techniques respectively. Data recorded and analyzed.
There were no adverse events.
V-E technique of mask ventilation is better than C-E technique, in delivering higher tidal volume.
No
Completed
2019 | Year | 10 | Month | 31 | Day |
2019 | Year | 11 | Month | 19 | Day |
2019 | Year | 11 | Month | 20 | Day |
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
2021 | Year | 10 | Month | 31 | Day |
2021 | Year | 10 | Month | 31 | Day |
2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 23 | Day |
2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 23 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000056139
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |