UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000048890 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000055704 |
| Scientific Title | Effects of Applied Behavioral Analysis-based Notation Methods on Motion Memory |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2022/09/09 |
| Last modified on | 2025/03/12 09:24:54 |
* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments
Basic information
Public title
Effects of different memory methods on memorization
Acronym
memory study
Scientific Title
Effects of Applied Behavioral Analysis-based Notation Methods on Motion Memory
Scientific Title:Acronym
Effects of Applied Behavioral Analysis-based Notation Methods on Motion Memory
Region
| Japan |
Condition
Condition
cerebrovascular disease
Classification by specialty
| Rehabilitation medicine | Adult |
Classification by malignancy
Others
Genomic information
NO
Objectives
Narrative objectives1
The purpose of this study is to compare the conventional method of memory acquisition by repetitive practice with the method using applied behavior analysis, and to search for an effective method of memory acquisition. However, this study will focus on healthy subjects because it is difficult to compare the methods with actual subjects with higher functional disabilities or dementia. Therefore, as a basic research on the influence of different rehearsal methods in the semantic memory process, this study focuses on rehearsal in the memory process and compares the number of words memorized by ordinary repetitive practice and the method using applied behavior analysis, targeting terminated students aged 18 to 23.
Basic objectives2
Efficacy
Basic objectives -Others
Trial characteristics_1
Trial characteristics_2
Developmental phase
Assessment
Primary outcomes
Percentage of correct answers within the inscription time during the operation requiring 10 procedures (number of correct answers immediately and after 24 hours).
Key secondary outcomes
Number of successful participants (e.g., number of participants who were able to perform all 10 procedures)
Number of times until all 10 procedures are learned
Number of rehearsals
Base
Study type
Interventional
Study design
Basic design
Cross-over
Randomization
Randomized
Randomization unit
Individual
Blinding
Open -no one is blinded
Control
No treatment
Stratification
Dynamic allocation
Institution consideration
Blocking
Concealment
Intervention
No. of arms
3
Purpose of intervention
Treatment
Type of intervention
| Other |
Interventions/Control_1
The style of the prompts used to indicate the action procedure will be compared between a (written prompts) and b (video or photo prompts) to see if they affect the memory of the action procedure.
Interventions/Control_2
We will compare A (prompt-fading method) and B (time-delay method) prompts (giving method) to examine whether they affect the memory of the action procedure.
Interventions/Control_3
To compare the difficulty of rehearsal in the memory process between (1) (shaping method) and (2) (method of remembering targets at once) and to examine whether it affects the memory of the movement procedure.
Interventions/Control_4
Interventions/Control_5
Interventions/Control_6
Interventions/Control_7
Interventions/Control_8
Interventions/Control_9
Interventions/Control_10
Eligibility
Age-lower limit
| 18 | years-old | <= |
Age-upper limit
| 23 | years-old | > |
Gender
Male and Female
Key inclusion criteria
(1) Students who are between 18 and 23 years of age at the time of obtaining consent.
(2) Students who have received a full explanation of their participation in this study and who have given their consent of their own free will.
Key exclusion criteria
(1) Persons who do not have cerebrovascular disease or mental illness
(2) Other persons deemed inappropriate by the principal investigator or co-investigators.
Target sample size
30
Research contact person
Name of lead principal investigator
| 1st name | Saori |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Arai |
Organization
Ryotokuji University
Division name
Department of Health Sciences, Department of Science and Technology
Zip code
279-8567
Address
5-8-1 Akemi, Urayasu City, Chiba
TEL
047-382-2642
s-arai@ryotokuji-u.ac.jp
Public contact
Name of contact person
| 1st name | Saori |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Arai |
Organization
Ryotokuji University
Division name
Department of Health Sciences, Department of Science and Technology
Zip code
279-8567
Address
5-8-1 Akemi, Urayasu City, Chiba
TEL
047-382-2642
Homepage URL
s-arai@ryotokuji-u.ac.jp
Sponsor or person
Institute
International University of Health and Welfare
Institute
Department
Personal name
Funding Source
Organization
no
Organization
Division
Category of Funding Organization
Other
Nationality of Funding Organization
Other related organizations
Co-sponsor
Name of secondary funder(s)
IRB Contact (For public release)
Organization
Ryotokuji University
Address
5-8-1 Akemi, Urayasu City, Chiba
Tel
047-382-2642
s-arai@ryotokuji-u.ac.jp
Secondary IDs
Secondary IDs
NO
Study ID_1
Org. issuing International ID_1
Study ID_2
Org. issuing International ID_2
IND to MHLW
Institutions
Institutions
Other administrative information
Date of disclosure of the study information
| 2022 | Year | 09 | Month | 09 | Day |
Related information
URL releasing protocol
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpts/34/12/34_2022-082/_pdf
Publication of results
Partially published
Result
URL related to results and publications
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpts/34/12/34_2022-082/_pdf
Number of participants that the trial has enrolled
40
Results
The set number wherein all movement elements were recalled was significantly lower in the intervention method than in the control condition (p < 0.01).
movement elements that were recalled in which all participants performed the task in both conditions and the number of consecutive recall after 7 days are shown in significantly fewer in the intervention method than in the control condition (p < 0.01).
Results date posted
| 2023 | Year | 04 | Month | 25 | Day |
Results Delayed
Results Delay Reason
Date of the first journal publication of results
| 2022 | Year | 12 | Month | 05 | Day |
Baseline Characteristics
In physical therapy, we experience subjects who have the motor functions necessary for movement but need constant instruction in movement procedures. Continued failure in movement practice without success may cause learned helplessness, which may affect other learning. Error-free learning is effective against these problems, and studies using intervention methods based on concepts from applied behavior analysis have been reported1) . 1) Interventions for movement memory may be an essential strategy for physical therapy.
In this study, we investigated the effects of two different visual teaching methods on recall of movement procedures in young healthy subjects.
Participant flow
Participants were 40 university students (20 males and 20 females, mean age 20.4 years). Participants performed a task in which they memorized and recalled movements consisting of 10 movement elements (10 standing postures). Two types of movements were used in the task (movement A and B), and two types of memory methods were used (control and intervention conditions). Movements A and B consisted of the same 10 movement elements, but in a different order.
In the control condition, participants memorized the sequence from 1 to 10 while looking at a paper with pictures of the 10 movements arranged in order. In the intervention condition, the 10 movement elements were divided into five blocks of two movements each, and the examiner first presented the participants with a piece of paper depicting two movement elements and asked them to memorize the movements. When the participants judged that they had memorized the blocks themselves, they were asked to demonstrate without looking at the paper. The examiner checked whether the participant's movements matched the movements on the paper, and if they were correct, the participant was given a picture of the next block and the same instructions. If the movements were incorrect, the participant was instructed to re-memorize the incorrect block.
In both conditions, each set consisted of a 30-second task study, a one-minute verification test, and a video evaluation of the movements and feedback. Two judges viewed the video and made judgments during the confirmation test. The judging items were movement agreement and movement speed (80 bpm per movement: checked with a metronome). In the control condition, the participants relearned the movements using a piece of paper with 1 to 10 movement elements, regardless of whether or not they had made an error in the verification test. In the intervention condition, learning of the next task started from the block in which the error was made. The task was terminated when the correct sequence of actions from 1 to 10 was performed in the confirmation test.
Adverse events
The method of memorizing the movement procedures is not expected to impose a significant physical burden on the research subjects. However, there is a possibility of mental fatigue and burden due to the amount of memorization. In addition, no burden or risk is considered to arise from participation in this study.
Outcome measures
The correctness or incorrectness of the order of movements and combinations of movement elements in each set, and in the intervention condition, the block numbers at the beginning and end of the set were recorded. In addition, the median difference between conditions, the number of sets in which all 10 movements were recalled, the number of consecutive recalls per set (up to a set in which at least one of the 10 movements was correctly completed), and the number of consecutive recalls after 7 days were calculated. A psychological questionnaire was also administered during the implementation of the study.
Plan to share IPD
IPD sharing Plan description
Progress
Recruitment status
Suspended
Date of protocol fixation
| 2022 | Year | 01 | Month | 28 | Day |
Date of IRB
| 2022 | Year | 01 | Month | 28 | Day |
Anticipated trial start date
| 2022 | Year | 01 | Month | 28 | Day |
Last follow-up date
| 2023 | Year | 03 | Month | 30 | Day |
Date of closure to data entry
Date trial data considered complete
Date analysis concluded
Other
Other related information
Management information
Registered date
| 2022 | Year | 09 | Month | 08 | Day |
Last modified on
| 2025 | Year | 03 | Month | 12 | Day |
Link to view the page
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000055704
